Who is TrackJS best for?

TrackJS is built for Frontend and full-stack JavaScript developers, Engineering teams at small-to-mid-size web businesses, QA engineers monitoring production application quality, Development managers tracking site error rates and trends. Common use cases include Catching production JavaScript errors before users report them; Debugging AI-generated or third-party JavaScript in production; Frontend error monitoring for React, Angular, and Next.js applications.

How is TrackJS priced?

Three self-serve tiers, billed monthly or annually (annual saves one month). Starter: $49/month ($45 annualized)—100K page views, 1 application, 10-day retention, 3 alert channels, unlimited users and ignore rules. Professional: $99/month ($91 annualized)—1M page views, 5 applications, 15-day retention, unlimited alert channels. Business: $199/month ($183 annualized) starting at 5M page views, scaling to 100M; 10+ applications, 30-day retention, SAML SSO, dedicated support. Enterprise and custom plans available. Discounted plans for bootstrapped developers and non-profits. Free trial with no credit card required. No per-error charges; errors are rate-limited per minute by plan but never billed.

What are the alternatives to TrackJS?

Common Error Tracking & Crash Reporting alternatives to TrackJS include Sentry, Bugsnag, Rollbar, Raygun, LogRocket. See the full comparison hub at /verticals/error-tracking-crash-reporting/compare.

What do users praise about TrackJS?

Users frequently praise: Easy integration and quick setup; Telemetry Timeline provides rich pre-error context; Intuitive and clean dashboard; Highly responsive customer support; Effective at surfacing corner-case production bugs; Useful error frequency and user-impact visibility; Customizable filtering and ignore rules.

What are common complaints about TrackJS?

Frequently cited limitations: UI design feels dated and could be improved; Short data retention windows on lower plans; Low review volume limits peer benchmarking.

When was TrackJS founded and where?

TrackJS was founded in 2013, headquartered in Stillwater, Minnesota, USA by Todd Gardner, Eric Brandes.

TrackJS reports 1-10 employees, ~1,000 customers.

AI visibility report

AI visibility report for TrackJS in Error Tracking & Crash Reporting.

Outside the top three on 22 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.

Sentry is cited on 18 of those losses.

25 prompts

6 platforms

Updated Sep 3, 2026 - refreshed weekly

Track TrackJS daily

Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for TrackJS.

Track TrackJS across these prompts daily.

Start free trial

10percent

Presence Rate

Low presence

Still absent from 90% of tracked prompt responses

Top-3 citations across 150 prompt × platform pairs

+0.40

Sentiment

-1.00.0+1.0

Positive

No clearrank

Peer Ranking

#1#11

No clear rankin Error Tracking & Crash Reporting

Key Metrics

Presence Rate

10.0%

Share of Voice

4.6%

Avg Position

#31.9

Docs Presence

0.7%

Blog Presence

1.3%

Brand Mentions

2.7%

Platform Breakdown

Grok

60%15/25 prompts

ChatGPT

Research dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ

Overview

TrackJS is a bootstrapped, JavaScript-specialist error monitoring service founded in 2013 and headquartered in Stillwater, Minnesota. Built by a small engineering team, it captures production errors from browser and Node.js environments and surfaces them with a proprietary Telemetry Timeline—a chronological log of network requests, user interactions, console logs, and navigation events leading up to each error. The product is deliberately narrow in scope: no session replay, no heatmaps, no full-stack APM. Plans are priced by monthly page-view traffic rather than error volume, positioning TrackJS as aligned with customer success rather than failure rates. An AI Code Debugger, added in 2025, analyzes error telemetry to suggest fixes. Customers include Microsoft, IKEA, Bloomberg, Atlassian, Venmo, and eBay.

TrackJS is a focused JavaScript error monitoring platform that automatically captures production errors from web browsers and Node.js servers, enriching each error with a Telemetry Timeline of pre-error events to accelerate root-cause diagnosis. It offers unlimited ignore rules, source map integration, AI-assisted debugging, and discoverable filtering—all in an 8 KB agent with no end-user cookies or session recording.

Reviews

4.7/5G2·20+

Praised

Easy integration and quick setup
Telemetry Timeline provides rich pre-error context
Intuitive and clean dashboard
Highly responsive customer support
Effective at surfacing corner-case production bugs
Useful error frequency and user-impact visibility
Customizable filtering and ignore rules

Criticized

UI design feels dated and could be improved
Short data retention windows on lower plans
Low review volume limits peer benchmarking

TrackJS holds a 4.7/5 rating on G2 across 20 reviews, with 85% five-star and 15% four-star scores and no reviews below four stars. Reviewers consistently highlight the ease of integration, the quality of error context provided by the Telemetry Timeline, responsive customer support, and the intuitive dashboard. The primary criticism is that the UI design could be improved. The review volume is modest given the company's size and niche focus.

Prompt	ChatGPT	Google AI Mode	Perplexity	Gemini Search	Bing Copilot	Grok
Capability3/5 cited (60%)
Which error tracking platforms handle error grouping best for flaky or non-deterministic errors with slightly different stack traces each time?	A competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Your brand and a competitor were cited

#	Brand	PresencePres.	Share of VoiceSoV	DocsDocs	BlogBlog	MentionsMent.	Avg PosPos	Sentiment
1	Sentry	28.0%	36.9%	21.3%	7.3%	80.0%	#29.8	+0.49
2	Bugsnag	25.3%	23.9%	24.0%	0.7%	56.0%	#37.6	+0.55
3	Rollbar	25.3%	21.5%	20.0%	8.0%	55.3%	#40.6	+0.51
4	Raygun	11.3%	5.5%	1.3%	10.7%	14.0%	#34.2	+0.40
5	LogRocket	10.0%	3.8%	0.7%	2.0%	10.0%	#31.3	+0.45
6	TrackJS	10.0%	4.6%	0.7%	1.3%	2.7%	#31.9	+0.40
7	Airbrake	2.7%	0.9%	2.0%	0.0%	7.3%	#28.0	+0.53
8	Highlight.io	2.7%	2.2%	0.7%	0.0%	4.7%	#51.1	+0.55
9	Embrace	1.3%	0.7%	0.0%	1.3%	0.0%	#16.7	+0.68
10	Jam.dev	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	—	—
11	Luciq	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	—	—

Developer Experience4/5 cited (80%)
What error tracking tools do teams typically use to manage the full workflow from alert to assignment to resolution in one place?	A competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Your brand and a competitor were cited

Integrations & Ecosystem1/5 cited (20%)
Which error tracking tools integrate best with on-call and incident management systems to page the right person when a critical error spikes?	A competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	A competitor was cited

Performance & Reliability4/5 cited (80%)
What event volume limits should I expect from error tracking platforms at scale — and which ones have the most predictable pricing as volume grows?	A competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Your brand and a competitor were cited