AI visibility report
TrackJS ranks #5 in Error Tracking & Crash Reporting AI search.
Outside the top three on 19 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.
Sentry is cited on 17 of those losses.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for TrackJS.
Track TrackJS across these prompts daily.
Start free trial#5 among 11 vendors · still absent from 88.7% of tracked prompt responses
Top-3 citations across 150 prompt × platform pairs
Peer Ranking
Key Metrics
Platform Breakdown
Grok
Perplexity
Gemini Search
Google AI Mode
Bing Copilot
ChatGPTVisible, but narrative can improve. TrackJS ranks #5 on presence but #7 on sentiment. The brand appears relatively often, but competitors may be getting more favorable language when they appear.
Where TrackJS is losing
Prompts where competitors are visible and TrackJS is not.
These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.
Where TrackJS is winning3
Which error tracking platforms automatically capture the most useful context — breadcrumbs, user state, request data — so engineers can reproduce bugs without user help?
Avg # 1.0 · 1 platform
Which error tracking platforms offer the best sampling rate controls to manage cost and noise in production without missing critical low-frequency errors?
Avg # 4.0 · 1 platform
Which error tracking tools handle deduplication and grouping best to reduce alert fatigue when a single bug triggers thousands of duplicate events?
Avg # 16.0 · 1 platform
Where TrackJS is losing5
Which error tracking platforms can correlate a frontend JS error with the backend API call that caused it across a distributed trace?
Competitors on 4 platforms
Track this promptWhat are the best error tracking tools for a Next.js app that handles both server-side and client-side rendering without doubling up on error events?
Competitors on 4 platforms
Track this promptWhich error tracking platforms handle source map uploads well so you see original TypeScript line numbers instead of minified bundle references?
Competitors on 4 platforms
Track this promptWhat event volume limits should I expect from error tracking platforms at scale — and which ones have the most predictable pricing as volume grows?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhich error tracking SDKs have the lowest page load overhead and offer async or lazy-loading options to minimise impact?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this prompt
Track TrackJS daily before the next report refresh.
Track these gapsResearch dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ
Overview
TrackJS is a bootstrapped, JavaScript-specialist error monitoring service founded in 2013 and headquartered in Stillwater, Minnesota. Built by a small engineering team, it captures production errors from browser and Node.js environments and surfaces them with a proprietary Telemetry Timeline—a chronological log of network requests, user interactions, console logs, and navigation events leading up to each error. The product is deliberately narrow in scope: no session replay, no heatmaps, no full-stack APM. Plans are priced by monthly page-view traffic rather than error volume, positioning TrackJS as aligned with customer success rather than failure rates. An AI Code Debugger, added in 2025, analyzes error telemetry to suggest fixes. Customers include Microsoft, IKEA, Bloomberg, Atlassian, Venmo, and eBay.
TrackJS is a focused JavaScript error monitoring platform that automatically captures production errors from web browsers and Node.js servers, enriching each error with a Telemetry Timeline of pre-error events to accelerate root-cause diagnosis. It offers unlimited ignore rules, source map integration, AI-assisted debugging, and discoverable filtering—all in an 8 KB agent with no end-user cookies or session recording.
Key Facts
- Founded
- 2013
- HQ
- Stillwater, Minnesota, USA
- Founders
- Todd Gardner, Eric Brandes
- Employees
- 1-10
- Customers
- ~1,000
- Status
- Private (Bootstrapped)
Target users
Key Capabilities10
- JavaScript error monitoring for browser and Node.js environments
- Telemetry Timeline: chronological pre-error log of network requests, user interactions, console events, and navigation
- Unlimited server-side ignore rules for filtering third-party and low-signal errors
- Source map support for minified and TypeScript code debugging
- AI Code Debugger: analyzes telemetry and source to suggest fixes
- Error grouping, trend analysis, and one-click discoverable filtering
- Error status tracking (e.g., Fixed, Investigating) and team comments
- Custom domain forwarding to bypass ad blockers
- Traffic-based pricing with unlimited error submissions
- Web Worker and unhandled Promise rejection monitoring
Key Use Cases8
- Catching production JavaScript errors before users report them
- Debugging AI-generated or third-party JavaScript in production
- Frontend error monitoring for React, Angular, and Next.js applications
- Node.js server-side error tracking for Express-based APIs
- Shopify theme and e-commerce storefront error monitoring
- Reducing error noise from browser extensions, bots, and unsupported browsers
- Version-correlated error tracking across continuous deployments
- Proactive alerting on new, trending, or spiking errors
Recent Trend
How AI describes TrackJS3
Short answer: Sentry (with its Next.js integration) and TrackJS are top options for unified server- and client-side error tracking in Next.js without double-counting errors.
What are the best error tracking tools for a Next.js app that handles both server-side and client-side rendering without doubling up on error events?
TrackJS — small bundle, async loader, minimal runtime work. * Bugsnag — supports deferred initialization and has a small JS payload.
Which error tracking SDKs have the lowest page load overhead and offer async or lazy-loading options to minimise impact?
TrackJS * Performance: Recognized as extremely lightweight, with an SDK under 10KB gzipped.
Which error tracking platforms handle error grouping best for flaky or non-deterministic errors with slightly different stack traces each time?
Most cited sources8
115 Best Frontend Error Monitoring Tools in 2026 • TrackJS
trackjs.com·Comparison
- 4
Error Monitoring on Client- and Server-Side in NextJS 14+ • TrackJS
trackjs.com·Comparison
- 2
BugSnag vs Rollbar - Compare Pricing & Features in 2026 • TrackJS
trackjs.com·Comparison
- 8
Rollbar vs BugSnag - Compare Pricing & Features in 2026 • TrackJS
trackjs.com·Comparison
- 2
Rollbar vs Sentry - Compare Pricing & Features in 2026 • TrackJS
trackjs.com·Comparison
- 1
BugSnag vs Sentry - Compare Pricing & Features in 2026
trackjs.com·Comparison
Alternatives in Error Tracking & Crash Reporting6
TrackJS positions itself as the JavaScript-specialist alternative to broader observability platforms.
- Its core differentiators are: (1) frontend-only focus—deliberately no session replay, heatmaps, or backend APM—keeping complexity and cost low; (2) traffic-based pricing rather than per-error pricing, arguing that competitors 'profit when you fail'; (3) bootstrapped independence, actively marketing stability and alignment of incentives as a counterpoint to VC-funded rivals; and (4) the Telemetry Timeline, which TrackJS claims to have pioneered in 2014, giving developers a chronological pre-error event log without requiring full session recording.
- TrackJS self-positions as cheaper and simpler than Sentry for pure frontend needs and considerably cheaper than Rollbar.
Reviews
Praised
- Easy integration and quick setup
- Telemetry Timeline provides rich pre-error context
- Intuitive and clean dashboard
- Highly responsive customer support
- Effective at surfacing corner-case production bugs
- Useful error frequency and user-impact visibility
- Customizable filtering and ignore rules
Criticized
- UI design feels dated and could be improved
- Short data retention windows on lower plans
- Low review volume limits peer benchmarking
TrackJS holds a 4.7/5 rating on G2 across 20 reviews, with 85% five-star and 15% four-star scores and no reviews below four stars. Reviewers consistently highlight the ease of integration, the quality of error context provided by the Telemetry Timeline, responsive customer support, and the intuitive dashboard. The primary criticism is that the UI design could be improved. The review volume is modest given the company's size and niche focus.
Pricing
Three self-serve tiers, billed monthly or annually (annual saves one month).
- Starter
$49/month ($45 annualized)—100K page views, 1 application, 10-day retention, 3 alert channels, unlimited users and ignore rules.
- Professional
$99/month ($91 annualized)—1M page views, 5 applications, 15-day retention, unlimited alert channels.
- Business
$199/month ($183 annualized) starting at 5M page views, scaling to 100M; 10+ applications, 30-day retention, SAML SSO, dedicated support. Enterprise and custom plans available. Discounted plans for bootstrapped developers and non-profits. Free trial with no credit card required. No per-error charges; errors are rate-limited per minute by plan but never billed.
Limitations
- JavaScript/Node.js only—company states it is unlikely to add other backend language support.
- No session replay, heatmaps, or behavioral analytics (by design).
- Data retention is short: 10 days on Starter, 15 days on Professional, 30 days on Business.
- Per-minute error rate limits apply on all plans (20/min Starter, 60/min Professional, 90/min Business).
- Very small team (2–3 people) may limit pace of feature development.
- Limited review volume on third-party sites reduces social proof compared to larger competitors.
- Single application on Starter plan may be restrictive for agencies or multi-project teams.
Frequently asked questions
Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic
Topic Coverage
Prompt-Level Results
| Prompt | Gemini Search | Perplexity | Google AI Mode | Bing Copilot | ChatGPT | Grok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capability3/5 cited (60%) | ||||||
Which error tracking platforms can correlate a frontend JS error with the backend API call that caused it across a distributed trace? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which error tracking tools offer the best PII scrubbing and GDPR compliance features for stripping sensitive fields from payloads before they leave the browser? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which error tracking platforms handle background job errors as well as request-response errors from a web server? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which error tracking platforms handle error grouping best for flaky or non-deterministic errors with slightly different stack traces each time? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which platforms offer both error tracking and full session replay in one tool — and when does a team actually need both together? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Developer Experience4/5 cited (80%) | ||||||
What error tracking tools do teams typically use to manage the full workflow from alert to assignment to resolution in one place? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which error tracking tools handle deduplication and grouping best to reduce alert fatigue when a single bug triggers thousands of duplicate events? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which error tracking platforms offer the best release tracking so teams can tell whether a new deploy made error rates better or worse? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which error tracking platforms integrate best into a developer's normal workflow — IDE plugins, chat notifications, or built-in triage dashboards? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which error tracking platforms automatically capture the most useful context — breadcrumbs, user state, request data — so engineers can reproduce bugs without user help? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Integrations & Ecosystem1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
Which error tracking platforms offer the best webhook and event streaming support for building internal tooling on top of error data? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which error tracking platforms integrate natively with observability stacks — metrics, tracing, and logs — so you don't need two separate dashboards? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which error tracking tools integrate best with on-call and incident management systems to page the right person when a critical error spikes? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which error tracking platforms have the best two-way sync with issue trackers so bugs automatically get created and closed in the right project board? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What tools help teams correlate error tracking data with feature flag releases to automatically flag which deployment introduced a regression? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Performance & Reliability4/5 cited (80%) | ||||||
What event volume limits should I expect from error tracking platforms at scale — and which ones have the most predictable pricing as volume grows? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which error tracking SDKs have the lowest page load overhead and offer async or lazy-loading options to minimise impact? | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which error tracking platforms offer the best sampling rate controls to manage cost and noise in production without missing critical low-frequency errors? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which error tracking platforms buffer events locally during outages and replay them when connectivity is restored, rather than dropping events? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which error tracking platforms handle error storms gracefully when a bad deploy suddenly generates millions of events per minute? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Setup & First Run3/5 cited (60%) | ||||||
What's the easiest error tracking and crash reporting platform to integrate into a React Native app for both iOS and Android from a single SDK? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What are the best error tracking tools for a Next.js app that handles both server-side and client-side rendering without doubling up on error events? | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which error tracking platforms handle source map uploads well so you see original TypeScript line numbers instead of minified bundle references? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which error tracking platforms are designed for microservices architectures where errors in one service can cascade into others? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
I'm migrating error tracking to a new platform — which tools make it easiest to preserve historical data and recreate alert rules? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.
Track prompt changesVertical Ranking
| # | Brand | PresencePres. | Share of VoiceSoV | DocsDocs | BlogBlog | MentionsMent. | Avg PosPos | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sentry | 35.3% | 39.3% | 20.7% | 9.3% | 90.7% | #26.5 | +0.51 |
| 2 | Rollbar | 33.3% | 22.9% | 13.3% | 19.3% | 64.7% | #37.1 | +0.36 |
| 3 | Bugsnag | 18.7% | 20.9% | 16.7% | 0.7% | 63.3% | #40.2 | +0.46 |
| 4 | Raygun | 15.3% | 6.2% | 1.3% | 14.7% | 19.3% | #28.5 | +0.40 |
| 5 | TrackJS | 11.3% | 4.8% | 0.7% | 2.7% | 4.7% | #29.5 | +0.38 |
| 6 | LogRocket | 8.7% | 3.1% | 0.7% | 2.0% | 14.7% | #35.3 | +0.46 |
| 7 | Highlight.io | 2.0% | 1.9% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 3.3% | #56.4 | +0.50 |
| 8 | Embrace | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 0.7% | #16.7 | +0.68 |
| 9 | Airbrake | 1.3% | 0.4% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 6.7% | #52.5 | +0.30 |
| 10 | Jam.dev | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| 11 | Luciq | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
Turn this into your team dashboard
Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.