Who is Raygun best for?

Raygun is built for Software developers and engineering teams (mid-size, 5–250 people), CTOs and engineering leads responsible for application reliability, Product managers monitoring error impact on customer experience, SREs and DevOps teams managing production environments. Common use cases include Proactive production error detection and resolution for web and mobile apps; .NET and Flutter application monitoring and debugging; E-commerce checkout error reduction and conversion protection.

How is Raygun priced?

Raygun uses event-volume-based pricing with four tiers (Basic, Team, Business, Enterprise) for each product. Crash Reporting starts at $40/month (annual) for 100,000 errors; Team is $80/month for 200,000 errors; Business is $400/month for 1,000,000 errors. RUM and APM each start at $80/month (Basic) for 100,000 sessions/traces, with Business tiers at $800/month. Annual billing saves approximately 33% versus monthly. All plans include unlimited apps and members. On-demand overage is charged at $0.001 per error (CR) or $0.002 per session/trace (RUM/APM). Usage Capping and SAML SSO are available as add-ons on lower tiers. A 14-day free trial requires no credit card. Enterprise pricing is custom.

What are the alternatives to Raygun?

Common Error Tracking & Crash Reporting alternatives to Raygun include Sentry, Bugsnag, Rollbar, LogRocket, TrackJS. See the full comparison hub at /verticals/error-tracking-crash-reporting/compare.

What do users praise about Raygun?

Users frequently praise: Easy setup with minimal code ('two lines of code'); Intelligent error grouping reduces alert noise; Real-time error detection and alerting; AI Error Resolution suggests actionable fixes; Clean, intuitive dashboard UI; Excellent .NET and Flutter support; Tight integrations with Slack, Jira, and PagerDuty; Pinpoints exact line of code causing issues.

What are common complaints about Raygun?

Frequently cited limitations: Pricing perceived as expensive vs. competitors; No permanent free tier unlike Sentry; Unexpected billing increases from on-demand overage charges; Error grouping sometimes inconsistent for large volumes or custom error codes; Search limitations for finding specific errors in high-volume error lists; Some users report unhelpful customer support interactions; No native session replay feature.

When was Raygun founded and where?

Raygun was founded in 2007, headquartered in Wellington, New Zealand by John-Daniel Trask, Jeremy Boyd.

Raygun reports 11-50 employees, ~3,000 customers.

AI visibility report

Raygun ranks #4 in Error Tracking & Crash Reporting AI search.

Outside the top three on 22 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.

Sentry is cited on 17 of those losses.

25 prompts

6 platforms

Updated Sep 3, 2026 - refreshed weekly

Track Raygun daily

Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for Raygun.

Track Raygun across these prompts daily.

Start free trial

11percent

Presence Rate

Low presence

#4 among 11 vendors · still absent from 88.7% of tracked prompt responses

Top-3 citations across 150 prompt × platform pairs

+0.40

Sentiment

-1.00.0+1.0

Positive

#4of 11

Peer Ranking

#1#11

Above averagein Error Tracking & Crash Reporting

Key Metrics

Presence Rate

11.3%

Share of Voice

5.5%

Avg Position

#34.2

Docs Presence

1.3%

Blog Presence

10.7%

Brand Mentions

14.0%

Platform Breakdown

Grok

64%16/25 prompts

Perplexity

Research dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ

Overview

Raygun is an application monitoring platform founded in 2007 in Wellington, New Zealand, formerly known as Mindscape. It offers an integrated suite covering Crash Reporting, Real User Monitoring (RUM), and Application Performance Monitoring (APM), with all three products linked to provide end-to-end visibility from front-end user sessions to server-side traces. A flagship 2024 feature, AI Error Resolution, auto-prompts LLMs with stack trace and code context to suggest fixes. Raygun is particularly strong in the .NET ecosystem and supports virtually every major language and framework through lightweight SDKs. It serves startups through Fortune 500 enterprises across e-commerce, media, healthcare, and financial services, and is HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, and PCI compliant. The company has raised approximately $1.4M–$1.98M in total funding and remains privately held.

Reviews

4.3/5G2·123+

Praised

Easy setup with minimal code ('two lines of code')
Intelligent error grouping reduces alert noise
Real-time error detection and alerting
AI Error Resolution suggests actionable fixes
Clean, intuitive dashboard UI
Excellent .NET and Flutter support
Tight integrations with Slack, Jira, and PagerDuty
Pinpoints exact line of code causing issues

Criticized

Pricing perceived as expensive vs. competitors
No permanent free tier unlike Sentry
Unexpected billing increases from on-demand overage charges
Error grouping sometimes inconsistent for large volumes or custom error codes
Search limitations for finding specific errors in high-volume error lists
Some users report unhelpful customer support interactions
No native session replay feature

Raygun holds a 4.3/5 score on G2 across 123 reviews, with 59% five-star and 36% four-star ratings. Users consistently praise the ease of setup (often described as 'two lines of code'), intelligent error grouping that reduces noise, real-time alerting, and clean dashboard UI. The AI Error Resolution feature has been well-received, particularly among .NET developers. Common criticisms include pricing perceived as expensive for smaller teams, unexpected cost increases when exceeding event quotas, the absence of a free tier, and occasional inconsistency in error grouping for high-volume or custom error code scenarios.

Prompt	ChatGPT	Google AI Mode	Perplexity	Gemini Search	Bing Copilot	Grok
Capability3/5 cited (60%)
Which error tracking platforms handle error grouping best for flaky or non-deterministic errors with slightly different stack traces each time?	A competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Your brand and a competitor were cited

#	Brand	PresencePres.	Share of VoiceSoV	DocsDocs	BlogBlog	MentionsMent.	Avg PosPos	Sentiment
1	Sentry	28.0%	36.9%	21.3%	7.3%	80.0%	#29.8	+0.49
2	Bugsnag	25.3%	23.9%	24.0%	0.7%	56.0%	#37.6	+0.55
3	Rollbar	25.3%	21.5%	20.0%	8.0%	55.3%	#40.6	+0.51
4	Raygun	11.3%	5.5%	1.3%	10.7%	14.0%	#34.2	+0.40
5	LogRocket	10.0%	3.8%	0.7%	2.0%	10.0%	#31.3	+0.45
6	TrackJS	10.0%	4.6%	0.7%	1.3%	2.7%	#31.9	+0.40
7	Airbrake	2.7%	0.9%	2.0%	0.0%	7.3%	#28.0	+0.53
8	Highlight.io	2.7%	2.2%	0.7%	0.0%	4.7%	#51.1	+0.55
9	Embrace	1.3%	0.7%	0.0%	1.3%	0.0%	#16.7	+0.68
10	Jam.dev	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	—	—
11	Luciq	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	—	—

Developer Experience5/5 cited (100%)
What error tracking tools do teams typically use to manage the full workflow from alert to assignment to resolution in one place?	A competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Your brand and a competitor were cited

Integrations & Ecosystem3/5 cited (60%)
Which error tracking tools integrate best with on-call and incident management systems to page the right person when a critical error spikes?	A competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	A competitor was cited

Performance & Reliability4/5 cited (80%)
What event volume limits should I expect from error tracking platforms at scale — and which ones have the most predictable pricing as volume grows?	A competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited	A competitor was cited