AI visibility report
Veracode ranks #7 in DevSecOps & Application Security AI search.
Outside the top three on 20 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.
Endor Labs is cited on 13 of those losses.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for Veracode.
Track Veracode across these prompts daily.
Start free trial#7 among 12 vendors · still absent from 92.7% of tracked prompt responses
Top-3 citations across 150 prompt × platform pairs
Peer Ranking
Key Metrics
Platform Breakdown
Grok
Gemini Search
Google AI Mode
Perplexity
ChatGPT
Bing CopilotNarrower footprint, stronger tone. Veracode ranks #7 on presence but #4 on sentiment. That means the brand is framed well when it appears, but still needs broader prompt-response coverage.
Where Veracode is losing
Prompts where competitors are visible and Veracode is not.
These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.
Where Veracode is winning1
Which DevSecOps platforms have the best two-way integration with ticketing systems for tracking vulnerability remediation end to end?
Avg # 1.0 · 1 platform
Where Veracode is losing5
Which software supply chain security tools detect malicious packages, not just known vulnerable versions?
Competitors on 5 platforms
Track this promptWhich security scanning tools are best at reducing noise so developers actually act on alerts instead of ignoring them?
Competitors on 5 platforms
Track this promptWhich application security tools offer the best IDE-native experience vs. CI-only scanning — and what are the tradeoffs for developer adoption?
Competitors on 4 platforms
Track this promptWhich application security platforms are best at communicating vulnerabilities to developers in an actionable way rather than just generating noise?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhich DevSecOps platforms handle vulnerability prioritisation well when there are hundreds of findings across multiple repositories?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this prompt
Track Veracode daily before the next report refresh.
Track these gapsResearch dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ
Overview
Veracode is a Burlington, Massachusetts–based application security company founded in 2006 and currently private-equity backed by TA Associates and Thoma Bravo at a $2.5 billion valuation. Its cloud-native Application Risk Management Platform delivers SAST, DAST, SCA, ASPM, container security, AI-powered code remediation, malicious package blocking, penetration testing as a service, and developer security training under a single SaaS interface. The platform has scanned more than 1.5 million applications and helped remediate over 135 million software flaws, drawing on two decades of proprietary vulnerability research. Serving 2,500+ enterprise customers across financial services, government, healthcare, retail, and technology sectors, Veracode has been named a Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader for Application Security Testing for eleven consecutive years (2025) and integrates with 40+ developer tools including Jenkins, GitHub, Azure DevOps, Jira, and major IDEs.
Veracode's Application Risk Management Platform is a cloud-native SaaS solution unifying binary SAST, DAST, SCA, ASPM (via Risk Manager), container security, AI-driven code remediation (Veracode Fix), malicious package blocking (Package Firewall, powered by Phylum), penetration testing as a service, and developer eLearning and Security Labs. Supporting 24 programming languages, 77 frameworks, and 40+ CI/CD, IDE, and SCM integrations, the platform enables enterprise security and development teams to detect, contextualize, and remediate application vulnerabilities across the full SDLC with compliance-ready policy governance and less than 1.1% false-positive rate.
Key Facts
- Founded
- 2006
- HQ
- Burlington, MA, USA
- Founders
- Chris Wysopal, Christien Rioux, Jeff Fagnan
- Employees
- 500-1000
- Funding
- ~$107M (pre-acquisition VC)
- Customers
- 2,500+
- Valuation
- $2.5B
- Status
- Private (PE-backed: TA Associates majority + Thoma Bravo min
Target users
Key Capabilities10
- Binary SAST scanning of compiled code and bytecode across 24+ programming languages without requiring source-code upload
- Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) with Enterprise Mode for web apps, APIs, and external attack surface management
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA) for open-source and third-party dependency vulnerabilities with SBOM generation
- AI-powered code remediation (Veracode Fix) delivering auto-fix suggestions directly in developer IDEs
- Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) via Veracode Risk Manager, aggregating and deduplicating findings from Veracode and third-party tools
- Malicious package blocking (Package Firewall) powered by Phylum threat intelligence for supply-chain attack prevention
- Container and Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) security scanning
- Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS) combining automated and expert-led manual testing
- Developer security training via eLearning and hands-on Security Labs
- Enterprise compliance and policy governance with dashboards aligned to PCI, HIPAA, OWASP, and other frameworks
Key Use Cases8
- Shift-left vulnerability detection embedded in CI/CD pipelines and developer IDEs
- Open-source and software supply chain risk management
- Compliance and audit reporting for regulated industries (financial services, government, healthcare)
- AI-generated and vibe-coded application security validation
- Enterprise-wide application risk visibility and remediation prioritization (ASPM)
- Developer secure-coding enablement and skill-building
- Container and cloud-native application security
- Penetration testing and manual security validation for high-value applications
Veracode customer outcomes
60% of scans finish in under 5 minutes; 75% finish in under 10 minutes
After replacing a slower AppSec provider with Veracode, Cox Automotive's scan times dropped from days to minutes across its portfolio of 400+ onboarded applications. Developers adopted security scanning directly in their IDEs, enabling a cultural shift that made security a shared
Recent Trend
How AI describes Veracode3
| | Veracode | Primarily SaaS. Strong service reliability, but online connectivity is generally required for analysis.
Which security scanning platforms handle availability well so a critical fix can still ship even if the scanning service goes down temporarily?
...end-to-end | | Checkmarx | Correlation across SAST, SCA and APIs with exploitability insights | Large AppSec programs | | Veracode | Policy-based prioritization and business risk views | Regulated enterprises | | Mend | Excellent dependency prioritizati...
Which DevSecOps platforms handle vulnerability prioritisation well when there are hundreds of findings across multiple repositories?
| | Veracode | Compliance-heavy environments | ⭐⭐☆☆☆ | Strong detection but generally slower, making it better for scheduled scans than every PR.
Which SAST tools integrate into an existing CI pipeline without slowing down developer velocity?
Most cited sources8
- V5
Top 5 AppSec Tools Your Team Needs in 2026
veracode.com·Blog Post
- V3
Seamless DevSecOps for GitLab End to End Workflow
veracode.com·Blog Post
- V3
Top Software Supply Chain Security Best Practices - Veracode
veracode.com·Blog Post
- V1
Connectors | Veracode
veracode.com·Product Page
- V2
Application Security: The Complete Guide to AppSec - Veracode
veracode.com·Article
- V1
SAST vs. DAST for Security Testing: Unveiling the ...
veracode.com·Blog Post
Alternatives in DevSecOps & Application Security6
Veracode targets enterprise security and DevSecOps teams with a compliance-driven, cloud-native application security platform differentiated by 20+ years of proprietary vulnerability research, binary SAST (no source-code upload required), and a unified multi-scan-type governance layer under a single SaaS interface.
- Named a Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader for Application Security Testing for 11 consecutive years (2025) and Gartner Peer Insights Customers' Choice for five consecutive years, Veracode competes most directly with Checkmarx and OpenText Fortify at the enterprise end, and with Snyk and SonarSource among developer-centric buyers.
- Newer entrants such as Semgrep and Endor Labs challenge on price transparency and developer experience, while Veracode defends on breadth of coverage, compliance reporting depth, ASPM capabilities, and expert-services layer.
Reviews
Praised
- Unified SAST, DAST, and SCA under a single platform
- Low false-positive rate with actionable findings
- Strong compliance and policy reporting dashboards
- Broad CI/CD and IDE integration ecosystem
- Detailed remediation guidance and in-context learning
- Responsive customer support and onboarding teams
- Mature SCA capabilities with comprehensive vulnerability database
- Policy-driven enforcement for enterprise governance
Criticized
- High pricing and complex per-application licensing model
- Aggressive and pressurizing sales/renewal tactics
- Feature parity lag between US and European markets
- SaaS-only model with no on-premises deployment option
- Slow scan times on large codebases impacting CI pipeline speed
- Binary SAST requires compiled code upload, adding setup complexity
- Limited depth of Python and JavaScript static analysis support
- Steep learning curve and configuration overhead for new users
Veracode earns strong marks from enterprise security practitioners for its platform breadth, low false-positive SAST, compliance reporting, and responsive support. Gartner Peer Insights reviewers (4.6/5 across 424 ratings) consistently cite reliable static and dynamic analysis, intuitive dashboards, and strong CI/CD integration. Critical themes across G2 and Gartner include high pricing, complex per-application licensing, aggressive sales renewal tactics, a SaaS-only deployment model, and a noticeable feature lag between US and EU markets. Some users flag scan times slowing CI pipelines on large codebases and limited out-of-the-box Python/JavaScript support depth compared to developer-first alternatives.
Pricing
Veracode does not publish list prices and requires a custom quote. Third-party estimates for 2025 indicate starting costs of approximately $15,000/year for basic SAST coverage (up to ~100 applications), with DAST running roughly $20,000–$25,000/year for medium-sized portfolios, SCA starting around $12,000/year, and full enterprise suites commonly exceeding $100,000/year. Pricing scales with number of applications, scan frequency and depth, lines of code, selected modules, support tier, and contract length. Volume discounts and multi-year agreements are available. Per-application and per-microservice licensing models are offered. No free tier or public trial is available.
Limitations
- Veracode is SaaS-only with no on-premises deployment option, which some regulated or air-gapped environments find restrictive (noted by Gartner analysts).
- Pricing is opaque and custom-quoted with no public tiers; total cost of ownership is considered high relative to developer-first alternatives, and per-application licensing can escalate quickly.
- Binary SAST requires compiled code or binary upload, adding setup complexity versus source-based scanners.
- Scan times can slow CI pipelines for large codebases.
- Users report a feature-parity lag between the US and European markets.
- Some reviewers note limited Python and JavaScript support depth relative to competing SAST tools.
- No free trial is available.
- Sales tactics have drawn criticism in user reviews for being overly aggressive.
Frequently asked questions
Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic
Topic Coverage
Prompt-Level Results
| Prompt | Google AI Mode | ChatGPT | Perplexity | Bing Copilot | Gemini Search | Grok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capability3/5 cited (60%) | ||||||
Which application security platforms go beyond known CVEs to detect logic-level vulnerabilities and misconfigurations? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which software supply chain security tools detect malicious packages, not just known vulnerable versions? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
What tools cover SAST, DAST, and SCA in one platform — and which do teams use to cover all three vulnerability types without tool sprawl? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which SAST tools have the lowest real-world false positive rates and the best tooling for managing them at scale? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which secret scanning tools are best at both detecting credentials in git history and preventing new secrets from being committed? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Developer Experience2/5 cited (40%) | ||||||
Which application security platforms are best at communicating vulnerabilities to developers in an actionable way rather than just generating noise? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
What security tooling do teams typically use for managing findings across dozens of repositories from a single security engineer workflow? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which security scanning tools are best at reducing noise so developers actually act on alerts instead of ignoring them? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which DevSecOps platforms handle vulnerability prioritisation well when there are hundreds of findings across multiple repositories? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which application security tools offer the best IDE-native experience vs. CI-only scanning — and what are the tradeoffs for developer adoption? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Integrations & Ecosystem2/5 cited (40%) | ||||||
What cloud security posture management tools integrate well with container and orchestration platform security scanning? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which DevSecOps tools integrate best with SIEM platforms for correlating app security findings with infrastructure events? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which DevSecOps platforms have the best two-way integration with ticketing systems for tracking vulnerability remediation end to end? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which security scanning platforms have the best support for SBOM generation workflows for compliance and audit requirements? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which application security tools integrate natively into the pull request workflow so findings can block or warn on merges? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Performance & Reliability1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
Which security scanning platforms handle availability well so a critical fix can still ship even if the scanning service goes down temporarily? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which runtime application security tools have the lowest production overhead and are safe to run on high-traffic services? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which security vendors update their vulnerability databases fastest after major CVE disclosures like Log4Shell? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which enterprise application security platforms scale best when scanning thousands of repositories across multiple teams? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which application security scanning tools are fastest at scale and least likely to slow down PR pipelines as the codebase grows? | Your brand and a competitor were cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Setup & First Run0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
Which SAST tools integrate into an existing CI pipeline without slowing down developer velocity? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
I'm rolling out a software composition analysis tool across an engineering org — which platforms have the smoothest onboarding for large teams? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What are the best software supply chain security tools for a polyglot monorepo with Node.js, Python, and Go services? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What are the best container image scanning tools that catch vulnerabilities before images are pushed to production? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What secrets management tools are best for a small startup team to ensure developers never commit credentials to the repo? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.
Track prompt changesVertical Ranking
| # | Brand | PresencePres. | Share of VoiceSoV | DocsDocs | BlogBlog | MentionsMent. | Avg PosPos | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Endor Labs | 34.0% | 27.4% | 0.0% | 33.3% | 21.3% | #17.3 | +0.33 |
| 2 | Wiz | 20.7% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 26.0% | #24.1 | +0.41 |
| 3 | Checkmarx | 20.0% | 15.8% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 38.0% | #25.4 | +0.32 |
| 4 | Snyk | 17.3% | 15.3% | 7.3% | 6.0% | 67.3% | #32.2 | +0.36 |
| 5 | Jit | 11.3% | 5.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.3% | #17.0 | +0.34 |
| 6 | Semgrep | 8.7% | 8.0% | 2.7% | 4.0% | 35.3% | #41.7 | +0.41 |
| 7 | Veracode | 7.3% | 6.8% | 0.7% | 6.7% | 28.0% | #34.3 | +0.37 |
| 8 | Aqua Security | 5.3% | 2.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.3% | #29.8 | +0.36 |
| 9 | SonarSource | 4.7% | 2.5% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 2.7% | #24.9 | +0.35 |
| 10 | GitGuardian | 3.3% | 2.5% | 0.7% | 2.7% | 7.3% | #27.2 | +0.44 |
| 11 | Socket | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.7% | #20.0 | +0.00 |
| 12 | Chainguard | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.7% | — | — |
Turn this into your team dashboard
Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.