AI visibility report
Jit ranks #5 in DevSecOps & Application Security AI search.
Outside the top three on 22 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.
Endor Labs is cited on 14 of those losses.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for Jit.
Track Jit across these prompts daily.
Start free trial#5 among 12 vendors · still absent from 88.7% of tracked prompt responses
Top-3 citations across 150 prompt × platform pairs
Peer Ranking
Key Metrics
Platform Breakdown
Grok
Perplexity
Google AI Mode
ChatGPT
Bing Copilot
Gemini SearchVisible, but narrative can improve. Jit ranks #5 on presence but #8 on sentiment. The brand appears relatively often, but competitors may be getting more favorable language when they appear.
Where Jit is losing
Prompts where competitors are visible and Jit is not.
These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.
Where Jit is winning2
Which SAST tools integrate into an existing CI pipeline without slowing down developer velocity?
Avg # 4.0 · 1 platform
What tools cover SAST, DAST, and SCA in one platform — and which do teams use to cover all three vulnerability types without tool sprawl?
Avg # 4.0 · 1 platform
Where Jit is losing5
Which software supply chain security tools detect malicious packages, not just known vulnerable versions?
Competitors on 5 platforms
Track this promptWhich security scanning tools are best at reducing noise so developers actually act on alerts instead of ignoring them?
Competitors on 5 platforms
Track this promptWhich application security tools offer the best IDE-native experience vs. CI-only scanning — and what are the tradeoffs for developer adoption?
Competitors on 4 platforms
Track this promptWhich application security platforms are best at communicating vulnerabilities to developers in an actionable way rather than just generating noise?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhich DevSecOps platforms have the best two-way integration with ticketing systems for tracking vulnerability remediation end to end?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this prompt
Track Jit daily before the next report refresh.
Track these gapsResearch dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ
Overview
Jit is a cloud-native, developer-first Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) and DevSecOps orchestration platform founded in 2021 and headquartered in Boston, MA, with roots in Tel Aviv, Israel. The platform unifies more than ten open-source and commercial security scanners—covering SAST, SCA, DAST, IaC, CSPM, secrets detection, container scanning, and SBOM—into a single orchestration layer embedded directly in developer workflows. Jit's core concept, 'Minimal Viable Security' (MVS), provides pre-built, codified security plans that allow engineering teams to achieve immediate, contextually prioritized security coverage without requiring deep AppSec expertise. Its AI agents automate vulnerability triage, remediation ticket creation, and compliance reporting, enabling security teams to scale without proportional headcount growth. Jit raised a $38.5M seed round in 2022 and serves startups through enterprise customers.
Jit is an Agentic Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) platform that orchestrates and automates product security workflows across the full software development lifecycle. It unifies code scanning, cloud security, compliance automation, and vulnerability management through AI agents and a company-specific context graph, enabling both security and development teams to detect, prioritize, and remediate risks continuously—from code commit to cloud runtime.
Key Facts
- Founded
- 2021
- HQ
- Boston, MA, USA
- Founders
- David Melamed, Aviram Shmueli, Gil Zimmermann +2 more
- Employees
- 11-50
- Funding
- $38.5M
- Status
- Private
Target users
Key Capabilities10
- AI agents (SERA, COTA, RICA) that automate vulnerability triage, remediation ticketing, and compliance reporting
- Unified orchestration of 10+ SAST, SCA, DAST, IaC, CSPM, secrets, container, and SBOM scanners
- Continuous PR/MR-based scanning with in-workflow developer feedback across GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps
- Context graph for runtime risk prioritization (internet exposure, production status, database proximity)
- Pre-built and custom Security Plans (MVS, SOC2, OWASP ASVS, AWS FTR, PCI, HIPAA, CIS Benchmarks)
- Automated threat modeling and architecture security reviews
- Auto-remediation with suggested code fixes tested by Jit
- Audit-ready compliance evidence generation and gap analysis
- Developer security leaderboards, MTTR tracking, and team-level security metrics
- Custom AI agent creation via natural language for internal policy and workflow encoding
Key Use Cases8
- Building an automated AppSec program from day zero for startups
- Achieving and maintaining SOC2, OWASP, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and AWS FTR compliance
- Shift-left vulnerability detection across code, cloud, and CI/CD pipelines
- Consolidating fragmented security toolchains into a single orchestration layer
- Automated vulnerability prioritization to eliminate alert fatigue
- Enabling security ownership by development teams without deep AppSec expertise
- Continuous cloud security posture management across AWS, Azure, and GCP
- Generating SBOM and managing open-source license and dependency risk
Recent Trend
How AI describes Jit3
jit +1 Illustration * A typical workflow: pull request opened → automated security scan runs in CI → findings are posted inline in the PR → branch protection or merge queue blocks merge until issues are resolved or mitigated.
Which application security tools integrate natively into the pull request workflow so findings can block or warn on merges?
Jit Jit takes a minimalist, high-velocity approach. It acts as an orchestration layer for open-source and native security tools, presenting them as seamless developer workflows.
Which application security platforms are best at communicating vulnerabilities to developers in an actionable way rather than just generating noise?
...th ticketing systems (Jira, ServiceNow, Azure Boards) for end-to-end vulnerability tracking are Snyk , Cycode , Jit , Checkmarx One , and Contrast Security . These platforms excel at bi-directional synchronization, meaning the...
What cloud security posture management tools integrate well with container and orchestration platform security scanning?
Most cited sources8
- J9
Top 9 Software Supply Chain Security Tools - Jit.io
jit.io·Listicle
- J7
A Guide to Integrating Application Security Tools into CI/CD Pipelines | Jit
jit.io·Listicle
- J4
Compare the Top 10 SAST Tools for Maximum Code...
jit.io·Listicle
- J4
Top 10 Container Scanning Tools for 2026 | Jit
jit.io·Listicle
- J3
Integrating SAST Into Your CI/CD Pipeline: A...
jit.io·Listicle
- J3
Top 8 Git Secrets Scanners in 2026 - Jit.io
jit.io·Comparison
Alternatives in DevSecOps & Application Security6
Jit positions itself as an agentic, developer-first AppSec orchestration platform that unifies 10+ best-of-breed open-source and commercial security scanners into a single pane of glass.
- Its core differentiator is the 'Minimal Viable Security' (MVS) concept—pre-built, codified security plans that give engineering teams instant, contextually prioritized coverage without requiring deep security expertise.
- Unlike point-solution competitors (e.g., Snyk for SCA or Semgrep for SAST), Jit competes as an ASPM orchestration layer that wraps and coordinates those tools while adding AI agents, compliance automation, and a context graph for runtime risk prioritization.
- It targets both fast-moving startups needing day-zero security and enterprises seeking consolidated AppSec governance.
Reviews
Praised
- Easy setup and fast onboarding
- Deep GitHub PR and CI/CD pipeline integration
- Consolidation of multiple OSS security tools in one platform
- Responsive and supportive customer team
- Developer-friendly, low-friction UX
- Context-aware vulnerability prioritization
- Pre-built security plans accelerate compliance
- Lightweight and non-disruptive to development workflows
Criticized
- Some integrations still a work in progress
- Per-contributor pricing model can be confusing
- Admin interface needs improvement
- Difficult to audit ignored or suppressed alerts
- Limited aggregated analytics and reporting views
User reviews on G2 (4.5/5, 43 reviews) highlight Jit's ease of setup, deep GitHub and CI/CD integration, and strong customer support. Reviewers frequently praise the consolidation of multiple security tools into one platform and the developer-friendly experience. Common criticisms include some integrations still being incomplete, a per-contributor pricing model that can be confusing, limited aggregated analytics, and an admin interface that needs polish. Gartner Peer Insights reviews (not yet aggregated at time of research) are predominantly 5/5 and echo themes of fast onboarding, actionable findings, and responsive support.
Pricing
Jit offers a free tier to get started with no credit card required. Paid tiers include Growth and Enterprise plans. A flat-rate pricing model of approximately $50 per developer per month has been referenced in Gartner Peer Insights product listings, covering all security controls and features. DAST scanning for web apps and APIs is available on Growth and Enterprise accounts. Enterprise pricing is available on request. Jit is also available via the AWS Marketplace with contract-based pricing.
Limitations
- Some integrations noted by users as still a work in progress at time of review.
- Per-contributor pricing model described by some reviewers as confusing.
- Admin interface cited as needing improvement.
- Ignored/suppressed alerts are difficult to audit.
- Aggregated analytics views are limited.
- Code is scanned in the customer's own SCM environment (a privacy positive), but earlier versions had limited on-prem SCM support (addressed in 2024/2025 via the SERA agent).
- Market presence score on G2 is relatively low compared to more established competitors, reflecting the company's early stage.
Frequently asked questions
Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic
Topic Coverage
Prompt-Level Results
| Prompt | Google AI Mode | ChatGPT | Perplexity | Bing Copilot | Gemini Search | Grok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capability4/5 cited (80%) | ||||||
Which application security platforms go beyond known CVEs to detect logic-level vulnerabilities and misconfigurations? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which software supply chain security tools detect malicious packages, not just known vulnerable versions? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What tools cover SAST, DAST, and SCA in one platform — and which do teams use to cover all three vulnerability types without tool sprawl? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which SAST tools have the lowest real-world false positive rates and the best tooling for managing them at scale? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which secret scanning tools are best at both detecting credentials in git history and preventing new secrets from being committed? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Developer Experience1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
Which application security platforms are best at communicating vulnerabilities to developers in an actionable way rather than just generating noise? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What security tooling do teams typically use for managing findings across dozens of repositories from a single security engineer workflow? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which security scanning tools are best at reducing noise so developers actually act on alerts instead of ignoring them? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which DevSecOps platforms handle vulnerability prioritisation well when there are hundreds of findings across multiple repositories? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which application security tools offer the best IDE-native experience vs. CI-only scanning — and what are the tradeoffs for developer adoption? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Integrations & Ecosystem4/5 cited (80%) | ||||||
What cloud security posture management tools integrate well with container and orchestration platform security scanning? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which DevSecOps tools integrate best with SIEM platforms for correlating app security findings with infrastructure events? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which DevSecOps platforms have the best two-way integration with ticketing systems for tracking vulnerability remediation end to end? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which security scanning platforms have the best support for SBOM generation workflows for compliance and audit requirements? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which application security tools integrate natively into the pull request workflow so findings can block or warn on merges? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Performance & Reliability1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
Which security scanning platforms handle availability well so a critical fix can still ship even if the scanning service goes down temporarily? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which runtime application security tools have the lowest production overhead and are safe to run on high-traffic services? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which security vendors update their vulnerability databases fastest after major CVE disclosures like Log4Shell? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which enterprise application security platforms scale best when scanning thousands of repositories across multiple teams? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which application security scanning tools are fastest at scale and least likely to slow down PR pipelines as the codebase grows? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Setup & First Run3/5 cited (60%) | ||||||
Which SAST tools integrate into an existing CI pipeline without slowing down developer velocity? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
I'm rolling out a software composition analysis tool across an engineering org — which platforms have the smoothest onboarding for large teams? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What are the best software supply chain security tools for a polyglot monorepo with Node.js, Python, and Go services? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
What are the best container image scanning tools that catch vulnerabilities before images are pushed to production? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
What secrets management tools are best for a small startup team to ensure developers never commit credentials to the repo? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.
Track prompt changesVertical Ranking
| # | Brand | PresencePres. | Share of VoiceSoV | DocsDocs | BlogBlog | MentionsMent. | Avg PosPos | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Endor Labs | 34.0% | 27.4% | 0.0% | 33.3% | 21.3% | #17.3 | +0.33 |
| 2 | Wiz | 20.7% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 26.0% | #24.1 | +0.41 |
| 3 | Checkmarx | 20.0% | 15.8% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 38.0% | #25.4 | +0.32 |
| 4 | Snyk | 17.3% | 15.3% | 7.3% | 6.0% | 67.3% | #32.2 | +0.36 |
| 5 | Jit | 11.3% | 5.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.3% | #17.0 | +0.34 |
| 6 | Semgrep | 8.7% | 8.0% | 2.7% | 4.0% | 35.3% | #41.7 | +0.41 |
| 7 | Veracode | 7.3% | 6.8% | 0.7% | 6.7% | 28.0% | #34.3 | +0.37 |
| 8 | Aqua Security | 5.3% | 2.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.3% | #29.8 | +0.36 |
| 9 | SonarSource | 4.7% | 2.5% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 2.7% | #24.9 | +0.35 |
| 10 | GitGuardian | 3.3% | 2.5% | 0.7% | 2.7% | 7.3% | #27.2 | +0.44 |
| 11 | Socket | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.7% | #20.0 | +0.00 |
| 12 | Chainguard | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.7% | — | — |
Turn this into your team dashboard
Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.