AI visibility report
Aqua Security ranks #8 in DevSecOps & Application Security AI search.
Outside the top three on 22 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.
Endor Labs is cited on 15 of those losses.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for Aqua Security.
Track Aqua Security across these prompts daily.
Start free trial#8 among 12 vendors · still absent from 94.7% of tracked prompt responses
Top-3 citations across 150 prompt × platform pairs
Peer Ranking
Key Metrics
Platform Breakdown
Grok
Perplexity
Google AI Mode
ChatGPT
Bing Copilot
Gemini SearchNarrower footprint, stronger tone. Aqua Security ranks #8 on presence but #5 on sentiment. That means the brand is framed well when it appears, but still needs broader prompt-response coverage.
Where Aqua Security is losing
Prompts where competitors are visible and Aqua Security is not.
These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.
Where Aqua Security is winning1
What are the best container image scanning tools that catch vulnerabilities before images are pushed to production?
Avg # 2.5 · 2 platforms
Where Aqua Security is losing5
Which software supply chain security tools detect malicious packages, not just known vulnerable versions?
Competitors on 5 platforms
Track this promptWhich security scanning tools are best at reducing noise so developers actually act on alerts instead of ignoring them?
Competitors on 5 platforms
Track this promptWhich application security tools offer the best IDE-native experience vs. CI-only scanning — and what are the tradeoffs for developer adoption?
Competitors on 4 platforms
Track this promptWhich application security platforms are best at communicating vulnerabilities to developers in an actionable way rather than just generating noise?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhich DevSecOps platforms have the best two-way integration with ticketing systems for tracking vulnerability remediation end to end?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this prompt
Track Aqua Security daily before the next report refresh.
Track these gapsResearch dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ
Overview
Aqua Security, founded in 2015 and headquartered in Boston, MA and Ramat Gan, Israel, is a cloud native application security company delivering a unified Cloud Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP). The platform secures applications across the full lifecycle—from code and CI/CD pipelines through runtime—covering containers, Kubernetes, serverless functions, VMs, and hybrid/multi-cloud environments. Aqua combines agent-based runtime enforcement with agentless cloud visibility, integrating code security, software supply chain protection, cloud security posture management (CSPM), and cloud workload protection (CWPP) into a single platform. The company is also a major open-source contributor, maintaining widely adopted projects including Trivy (container vulnerability scanner), Tracee (eBPF-based runtime security), and kube-bench. Aqua reports more than 500 enterprise customers, including over 40% of the Fortune 100, with particular strength in financial services.
Aqua Security provides the Aqua CNAPP, an enterprise-grade Cloud Native Application Protection Platform that secures applications from code commit to production runtime. Core modules include: Code Security (vulnerability scanning, SCA, IaC, SBOM, supply chain assurance); Runtime Security (container runtime enforcement, CWPP, eBPF-based threat detection via Tracee, Dynamic Threat Analysis sandbox); and Posture Management (CSPM, Kubernetes Security Posture Management, CI/CD pipeline security). The platform is available as SaaS or self-hosted and supports all major cloud providers, container orchestrators, and DevOps toolchains. Aqua also maintains influential open-source projects—most notably Trivy, the most widely deployed open-source container vulnerability scanner—creating a community funnel into its enterprise offering.
Key Facts
- Founded
- 2015
- HQ
- Boston, MA, USA / Ramat Gan, Israel
- Founders
- Dror Davidoff, Amir Jerbi
- Employees
- 477-567
- Funding
- ~$325M
- Customers
- 500+
- Valuation
- >$1B
- Status
- Private
Target users
Key Capabilities10
- Cloud Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP) with unified agent and agentless coverage
- Container and Kubernetes vulnerability scanning integrated into CI/CD pipelines
- Runtime security and enforcement via eBPF-powered Tracee for containers, VMs, and serverless
- Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with misconfiguration detection across multi-cloud
- Software Supply Chain Security (SSCS) covering code, build tools, and delivery pipelines
- Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) for containers, serverless functions, and cloud VMs
- Dynamic Threat Analysis (DTA) via isolated sandbox for pre-deployment container behavioral analysis
- Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) scanning for misconfigurations before deployment
- Open-source Trivy scanner for vulnerability detection across container images, filesystems, and SBOMs
- GenAI and LLM application security including prompt injection attack prevention
Key Use Cases7
- Securing containerized and Kubernetes-native applications from build to runtime
- Automating DevSecOps by embedding security controls into CI/CD pipelines
- Software supply chain protection against third-party and open-source risks
- Cloud workload protection and runtime threat detection across multi-cloud environments
- Compliance automation for PCI-DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, FedRAMP, and CIS Benchmarks
- Vulnerability management with code-to-cloud context to reduce noise and prioritize remediation
- Securing GenAI and LLM workloads at runtime
Aqua Security customer outcomes
79% reduction in vulnerabilities
A leading Fortune 500 customer used Aqua to focus remediation efforts, dramatically reducing its attack surface and improving overall security posture.
Audi automated CVE management—including scanning, alerting, and blocking—across its container platform on AWS, and was able to rapidly identify and respond to the Log4j zero-day vulnerability while others struggled for weeks.
207% ROI; 90% reduction in vulnerability research and detection time
A commissioned Forrester Consulting Total Economic Impact study of Aqua Platform customers found $5.45 million in three-year benefits, a sub-six-month payback period, and a 207% ROI, including a 90% reduction in vulnerability research and detection time.
Recent Trend
How AI describes Aqua Security3
* ### Aqua Security Runtime Protection Uses eBPF extensively. Strengths: * Runtime attack detection * Container escape detection * Minimal application impact Generally considered safe for production workloads.
Which runtime application security tools have the lowest production overhead and are safe to run on high-traffic services?
...e compliance | SBOM plus license compliance workflows | Strong reporting for legal review and open-source governance | | Aqua Security | Container/Kubernetes security | SBOM generation tied to image scanning and runtime security | Useful when auditors ne...
Which security scanning platforms have the best support for SBOM generation workflows for compliance and audit requirements?
...Broad enterprise deployments | | Sysdig Secure | Partial | Excellent | ✅ | Excellent | ✅ | Kubernetes-first security | | Aqua Security Platform | Partial | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | ✅ | Container-native workloads | ### What "good integration"...
What cloud security posture management tools integrate well with container and orchestration platform security scanning?
Most cited sources7
- A6
Top 7 OSS Container Image Scanning Tools for 2025
aquasec.com·Listicle
- A4
SBOM Tools: The Basics and 5 Free Tools to Get You Started
aquasec.com·Article
- G1
snyk vs trivy result difference · Issue #1733
github.com·Product Page
- G1
Vens: The Smart Trivy Plugin for Contextual Vulnerability ...
github.com·Discussion
- A1
What Is Vulnerability Prioritization? Importance & Best Practices
aquasec.com·Article
- A1
Orca Integration - Aqua Security
aquasec.com·Product Page
Alternatives in DevSecOps & Application Security6
Aqua Security positions itself as the pioneer and largest pure-play cloud native security company, differentiating on depth of runtime protection (powered by eBPF via open-source Tracee), a combined agent-and-agentless architecture, and a purpose-built (not retrofitted) CNAPP purpose-built for containers, Kubernetes, and serverless.
- Its open-source community leadership—particularly Trivy (the most widely used container scanner) and kube-bench—creates strong developer brand equity.
- Versus Wiz, Aqua stresses enforcement-first runtime controls and open-source credibility where Wiz leads on agentless ease-of-use and CSPM breadth.
- Versus Snyk/Checkmarx/Veracode, Aqua is a full code-to-cloud CNAPP rather than an application security point solution.
- Primary competitive weaknesses include a steeper UI/UX learning curve and lower multi-cloud posture management scores compared to Wiz.
Reviews
Praised
- Comprehensive container and runtime security coverage
- Deep vulnerability scanning accuracy and CI/CD integration
- Strong open-source ecosystem (Trivy, Tracee)
- Multi-cloud visibility from a single platform
- High-quality Nautilus threat research team
- Responsive to customer feedback and product improvements
- Effective compliance reporting for regulated industries
Criticized
- Complex and non-intuitive UI with steep learning curve
- Scalability challenges at very high container/image volumes
- Implementation takes weeks to months and often requires professional services
- Pricing is opaque; requires custom quoting
- Remediation guidance is not always actionable or prescriptive
- False positives in image scanning
- Gaps in artifact scanning (e.g., Maven, npm)
Aqua Security receives generally positive reviews for the depth and accuracy of its container and runtime security capabilities, its comprehensive CNAPP feature set, and the quality of its Nautilus research team's threat intelligence. G2 users highlight ease of CI/CD integration and multi-cloud visibility. Critical feedback focuses on a steep learning curve, a non-intuitive UI that requires experience to navigate, implementation complexity, and concerns about scalability at very large enterprise scale. Gartner reviewers also note that remediation guidance is sometimes insufficiently actionable.
Pricing
Aqua's pricing is subscription-based and not publicly disclosed; it requires a custom quote based on the number of protected workloads, deployment options (SaaS or self-hosted), and selected security modules. TrustRadius indicates the platform starts at approximately $10,188 annually with multiple plan tiers. Billing is typically annual. A free open-source tier exists via Trivy and related projects. Professional services and implementation costs are additional considerations buyers should budget for alongside license fees.
Limitations
- Reviewers on Gartner Peer Insights and G2 consistently cite a complex and non-intuitive UI requiring significant onboarding effort.
- Scalability concerns arise at very large enterprise container volumes—one reviewer noted struggles handling high image/container throughput.
- Implementation typically takes several weeks to months, requiring professional services investment beyond licensing costs.
- Pricing is opaque and requires custom quoting.
- Some users report false positives in scanning and limited precision in static image scanning (images dropping off reports without remediation).
- Gaps noted in artifact scanning coverage (e.g., Maven, npm).
- Vendor lock-in risk cited given reliance on proprietary agents and support.
- Guidance on remediation steps has been described as insufficiently prescriptive.
Frequently asked questions
Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic
Topic Coverage
Prompt-Level Results
| Prompt | Google AI Mode | ChatGPT | Perplexity | Bing Copilot | Gemini Search | Grok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capability0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
Which application security platforms go beyond known CVEs to detect logic-level vulnerabilities and misconfigurations? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which software supply chain security tools detect malicious packages, not just known vulnerable versions? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What tools cover SAST, DAST, and SCA in one platform — and which do teams use to cover all three vulnerability types without tool sprawl? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which SAST tools have the lowest real-world false positive rates and the best tooling for managing them at scale? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which secret scanning tools are best at both detecting credentials in git history and preventing new secrets from being committed? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Developer Experience1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
Which application security platforms are best at communicating vulnerabilities to developers in an actionable way rather than just generating noise? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What security tooling do teams typically use for managing findings across dozens of repositories from a single security engineer workflow? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which security scanning tools are best at reducing noise so developers actually act on alerts instead of ignoring them? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which DevSecOps platforms handle vulnerability prioritisation well when there are hundreds of findings across multiple repositories? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which application security tools offer the best IDE-native experience vs. CI-only scanning — and what are the tradeoffs for developer adoption? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Integrations & Ecosystem2/5 cited (40%) | ||||||
What cloud security posture management tools integrate well with container and orchestration platform security scanning? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which DevSecOps tools integrate best with SIEM platforms for correlating app security findings with infrastructure events? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which DevSecOps platforms have the best two-way integration with ticketing systems for tracking vulnerability remediation end to end? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which security scanning platforms have the best support for SBOM generation workflows for compliance and audit requirements? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which application security tools integrate natively into the pull request workflow so findings can block or warn on merges? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Performance & Reliability1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
Which security scanning platforms handle availability well so a critical fix can still ship even if the scanning service goes down temporarily? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which runtime application security tools have the lowest production overhead and are safe to run on high-traffic services? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which security vendors update their vulnerability databases fastest after major CVE disclosures like Log4Shell? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which enterprise application security platforms scale best when scanning thousands of repositories across multiple teams? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which application security scanning tools are fastest at scale and least likely to slow down PR pipelines as the codebase grows? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Setup & First Run2/5 cited (40%) | ||||||
Which SAST tools integrate into an existing CI pipeline without slowing down developer velocity? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
I'm rolling out a software composition analysis tool across an engineering org — which platforms have the smoothest onboarding for large teams? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What are the best software supply chain security tools for a polyglot monorepo with Node.js, Python, and Go services? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
What are the best container image scanning tools that catch vulnerabilities before images are pushed to production? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
What secrets management tools are best for a small startup team to ensure developers never commit credentials to the repo? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.
Track prompt changesVertical Ranking
| # | Brand | PresencePres. | Share of VoiceSoV | DocsDocs | BlogBlog | MentionsMent. | Avg PosPos | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Endor Labs | 34.0% | 27.4% | 0.0% | 33.3% | 21.3% | #17.3 | +0.33 |
| 2 | Wiz | 20.7% | 14.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 26.0% | #24.1 | +0.41 |
| 3 | Checkmarx | 20.0% | 15.8% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 38.0% | #25.4 | +0.32 |
| 4 | Snyk | 17.3% | 15.3% | 7.3% | 6.0% | 67.3% | #32.2 | +0.36 |
| 5 | Jit | 11.3% | 5.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.3% | #17.0 | +0.34 |
| 6 | Semgrep | 8.7% | 8.0% | 2.7% | 4.0% | 35.3% | #41.7 | +0.41 |
| 7 | Veracode | 7.3% | 6.8% | 0.7% | 6.7% | 28.0% | #34.3 | +0.37 |
| 8 | Aqua Security | 5.3% | 2.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.3% | #29.8 | +0.36 |
| 9 | SonarSource | 4.7% | 2.5% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 2.7% | #24.9 | +0.35 |
| 10 | GitGuardian | 3.3% | 2.5% | 0.7% | 2.7% | 7.3% | #27.2 | +0.44 |
| 11 | Socket | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.7% | #20.0 | +0.00 |
| 12 | Chainguard | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.7% | — | — |
Turn this into your team dashboard
Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.