AI visibility report
AI visibility report for Timescale in Databases & Data Infrastructure.
Outside the top three on 19 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.
PingCAP is cited on 6 of those losses.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for Timescale.
Track Timescale across these prompts daily.
Start free trialStill absent from 98.7% of tracked prompt responses
Top-3 citations across 150 prompt × platform pairs
Peer Ranking
Key Metrics
Platform Breakdown
Perplexity
Bing Copilot
ChatGPT
Google AI Mode
Gemini Search
GrokHow to read this. Timescale appears in 1.3% of tracked prompt responses. Presence is absolute coverage; share of voice is relative citation share; sentiment measures tone only when the brand appears.
Where Timescale is losing
Prompts where competitors are visible and Timescale is not.
These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.
Where Timescale is winning1
I'm evaluating managed cloud databases versus self-hosted options for a seed-stage product — what should I look at?
Avg # 8.0 · 1 platform
Where Timescale is losing5
Which document databases handle schema evolution most smoothly — without requiring migration scripts for every change?
Competitors on 4 platforms
Track this promptWhich time-series databases maintain query performance best at 10 million events per second ingestion over long retention periods?
Competitors on 4 platforms
Track this promptWhich globally distributed SQL databases are worth evaluating for a latency-sensitive SaaS product compared to a traditional single-region setup?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhich distributed SQL platforms support migrating from a legacy relational database with minimal downtime for a production application?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhich columnar databases handle mixed OLAP and OLTP workloads well — when does it make sense to use one over a standard row-store?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this prompt
Track Timescale daily before the next report refresh.
Track these gapsResearch dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ
Overview
Timescale (legally Timescale, Inc., now operating as Tiger Data) is the creator of TimescaleDB, an open-source time-series database built as an extension to PostgreSQL. Founded in 2015 by Ajay Kulkarni and Michael Freedman, the company offers a fully managed cloud platform (Tiger Cloud) and a self-managed enterprise edition alongside the open-source core. TimescaleDB adds automatic partitioning, hybrid row/columnar storage, columnar compression, tiered storage, and over 200 time-series SQL functions to standard PostgreSQL—enabling petabyte-scale time-series workloads without abandoning SQL or the Postgres ecosystem. The platform serves use cases including IoT telemetry, financial tick data, IT observability, and AI/ML data pipelines, with 3M+ active databases and 2,000+ paying customers reported as of 2025.
Timescale (Tiger Data) provides a PostgreSQL-native time-series database platform: the open-source TimescaleDB extension, the fully managed Tiger Cloud (available on AWS and Azure Marketplaces), and TimescaleDB Enterprise for on-premises and private cloud deployments. Key technical primitives include Hypertables for automatic partitioning, Hypercore for hybrid row/columnar storage, columnar compression up to 95%, tiered storage to object storage, continuous aggregates for real-time materialized views, 200+ time-series SQL hyperfunctions, vector search via pgvectorscale and pg_textsearch, and TigerLake for native Apache Iceberg lakehouse integration.
Key Facts
- Founded
- 2015
- HQ
- New York City, USA
- Founders
- Ajay Kulkarni, Michael Freedman
- Employees
- 150-250
- Funding
- $180M
- Customers
- 2,000+ paying; 3M+ active databases
- Valuation
- >$1B
- Status
- Private
Target users
Key Capabilities10
- Automatic time-based and key-based partitioning via Hypertables for fast ingest at scale
- Hybrid row/columnar storage engine (Hypercore) for combined OLTP and OLAP workloads
- Up to 95% columnar compression with filters and aggregates applied directly on compressed data
- Tiered storage: hot SSD tier plus low-cost object storage ($0.021/GB-month) with unified SQL access
- Continuous aggregates (incremental materialized views) for sub-millisecond dashboard queries
- 200+ time-series SQL hyperfunctions (time_bucket, time_bucket_gapfill, etc.)
- Native vector search via pgvectorscale (DiskANN) and BM25 full-text search via pg_textsearch
- Lakehouse integration: ingest from Kafka/S3, replicate to Apache Iceberg (TigerLake)
- Fully managed cloud (Tiger Cloud) with disaggregated compute and storage, Multi-AZ HA, PITR
- Open-source TimescaleDB as a Postgres extension; self-managed enterprise edition available
Key Use Cases8
- IoT and industrial sensor data ingestion and analytics
- Financial market data, crypto tick data, and time-weighted average calculations
- IT observability, infrastructure metrics, and application performance monitoring
- Energy, oil & gas, and utilities operational data management
- Web3 and blockchain on-chain event analytics
- SaaS product analytics and event tracking at scale
- AI/ML feature stores and agentic memory built on Postgres
- Real-time dashboards combining operational and historical data
Timescale customer outcomes
66% monthly cost savings
Tiger Data freed up engineering team capacity and accelerated roadmap velocity for this oil & gas software company.
20+ systems connected vs. 2 previously
The Swiss energy company migrated from MSSQL and was able to connect 20+ systems to TimescaleDB with stable performance, after previously crashing with only 2 systems connected.
The manufacturing company unified real-time and historical data, streaming from TimescaleDB into Iceberg for cross-platform analytics on S3 and Athena.
The telecommunications company replaced a fragile custom pipeline of Kafka, Flink, and custom code with TigerLake as native infrastructure for streaming data from Postgres to Iceberg.
Recent Trend
How AI describes Timescale1
TSBS (Time Series Benchmark Suite) : A tool designed to benchmark databases specifically for time-series and DevOps workloads.
Which distributed SQL databases handle automatic failover most reliably when a node goes down — with the fastest recovery times?
Most cited sources2
Alternatives in Databases & Data Infrastructure6
Timescale (now operating as Tiger Data, legally Timescale, Inc. d/b/a Tiger Data) differentiates as the only time-series database built natively on unforked PostgreSQL, offering full SQL compatibility and the entire Postgres ecosystem rather than a proprietary query language.
- It targets developers who want petabyte-scale time-series performance without abandoning relational familiarity.
- Its open-core model (open-source TimescaleDB + fully managed Tiger Cloud) addresses both self-hosted and cloud-native buyers, competing directly against specialized time-series stores (QuestDB, InfluxDB) and broad analytical databases (ClickHouse, SingleStore) while overlapping with Postgres-centric cloud platforms (Neon, Supabase) on the cloud DBaaS dimension.
Reviews
Praised
- Fast write and ingest performance
- Full PostgreSQL compatibility and familiarity
- Quick and easy setup
- Up to 95% columnar compression with cost savings
- Continuous aggregates for real-time dashboards
- Tiered storage reducing long-term storage costs
- Active community support on Slack and Discord
- Comprehensive and production-depth documentation
Criticized
- Pricing high for small projects or hobby use (~$50/month minimum cited)
- Recent pricing model changes perceived negatively
- UI becomes slow when managing many tables
- Limited advanced visualization for vector data vs. dedicated vector databases
- Some enterprise DR features (cross-region backup) restricted to higher tiers
- Tedious to size down databases after historical loads and compression
On G2, Tiger Data (the rebranded Timescale Cloud product) holds a 4.6/5 rating from 33 verified reviews, with 72% 5-star ratings. Reviewers consistently praise fast ingest speeds, seamless PostgreSQL compatibility, easy setup, significant storage cost savings from compression, and strong community/documentation. Common criticisms include pricing perceived as high for small projects, UI slowness with many tables, and limited advanced vector visualization features compared to dedicated vector databases.
Pricing
Tiger Cloud uses consumption-based hourly billing with no credit card required for a 30-day free trial. Performance plan: compute starts at $30/month, storage at $0.177/GB-month (based on 5x average compression). Scale plan: compute starts at $36/month, storage at $0.212/GB-month, includes unlimited tiered storage at $0.021/GB-month, multi-node HA, unlimited VPCs, SOC 2 report. Enterprise plan: custom pricing with 24/7 production SLAs, HIPAA compliance, SAML SSO, cross-region backups, and up to 64 CPU/256 GB per service. Open-source TimescaleDB is free under the Timescale License.
Limitations
- Pricing is cited as high for small projects or individual developers (minimum ~$30/month for cloud compute).
- The web UI can become slow when managing large numbers of tables.
- Advanced visualization for vector data lags behind some competing vector-database products.
- Some enterprise disaster recovery features (cross-region backups at lower tiers) require upgrading to the Enterprise plan.
- Resizing databases downward after historical data loads and compression can be operationally tedious.
- Self-hosted deployments may require additional troubleshooting for initial setup.
Frequently asked questions
Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic
Topic Coverage
Prompt-Level Results
| Prompt | Bing Copilot | Perplexity | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini Search | Grok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capability0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
Which globally distributed SQL databases are worth evaluating for a latency-sensitive SaaS product compared to a traditional single-region setup? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What in-memory caching tools integrate best with persistent databases — and which are worth adding versus just optimizing primary database queries? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which managed database platforms offer the best multi-region replication with automatic conflict resolution for write-write scenarios? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What are the best dedicated vector databases, and how do they compare to adding vector search extensions to an existing relational database? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which columnar databases handle mixed OLAP and OLTP workloads well — when does it make sense to use one over a standard row-store? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Developer Experience0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
Which cloud-native database platforms handle connection pooling best for serverless workloads with unpredictable connection spikes? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which ORMs and query builders offer the best TypeScript experience for a distributed SQL database? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which time-series databases have the best query authoring and debugging experience for teams coming from relational databases? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which document databases handle schema evolution most smoothly — without requiring migration scripts for every change? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which developer-focused databases offer the best local development experience that actually mirrors the production setup? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Integrations & Ecosystem0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
Which developer-focused database platforms integrate best with IaC tools so database provisioning and config can be version-controlled? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What tools sync data from a primary operational database to an analytics warehouse for real-time reporting without heavy ETL infrastructure? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which cloud database platforms support change data capture for streaming row-level changes to a message queue or event bus with low latency? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which managed database platforms have the best ORM and query builder compatibility for JavaScript and Python ecosystems? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which managed database platforms make multi-cloud portability practical — so moving between cloud providers isn't a nightmare? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Performance & Reliability1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
Which managed database services offer the best backup and point-in-time recovery for production applications handling financial transactions? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which serverless database platforms maintain the best read/write throughput under sustained load with reliable autoscaling? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What tools and benchmarks help compare database platforms for high-concurrency transactional workloads before committing to one? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which time-series databases maintain query performance best at 10 million events per second ingestion over long retention periods? | A competitor was cited | Your brand was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which distributed SQL databases handle automatic failover most reliably when a node goes down — with the fastest recovery times? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Setup & First Run1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
What's the fastest serverless relational database to spin up and connect to a Node.js backend for a new SaaS app? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which distributed SQL platforms support migrating from a legacy relational database with minimal downtime for a production application? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
I'm evaluating managed cloud databases versus self-hosted options for a seed-stage product — what should I look at? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which developer-focused database platforms handle schema migrations with CI/CD pipeline tooling out of the box? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which database platforms support branching so I can get a fresh isolated database copy per pull request for feature development? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.
Track prompt changesVertical Ranking
| # | Brand | PresencePres. | Share of VoiceSoV | DocsDocs | BlogBlog | MentionsMent. | Avg PosPos | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PingCAP | 6.7% | 23.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | 6.0% | #4.7 | +0.28 |
| 2 | CockroachDB | 5.3% | 14.9% | 0.7% | 2.7% | 1.3% | #3.0 | +0.33 |
| 3 | Supabase | 4.7% | 16.2% | 4.0% | 0.7% | 18.7% | #2.8 | +0.71 |
| 4 | ClickHouse | 4.0% | 12.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10.0% | #3.9 | +0.38 |
| 5 | MongoDB | 2.7% | 6.8% | 2.0% | 0.0% | 27.3% | #2.6 | +0.59 |
| 6 | QuestDB | 2.7% | 8.1% | 0.0% | 2.7% | 5.3% | #3.0 | +0.67 |
| 7 | PlanetScale | 2.0% | 6.8% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 18.0% | #4.6 | +0.82 |
| 8 | Timescale | 1.3% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.7% | #7.0 | +0.68 |
| 9 | Xata | 1.3% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 2.7% | #8.5 | +0.60 |
| 10 | Fauna | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.3% | #1.0 | +0.20 |
| 11 | Neon | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 22.7% | #1.0 | +0.90 |
| 12 | Redis | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 12.7% | #2.0 | +0.00 |
| 13 | SingleStore | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 5.3% | #3.0 | +0.20 |
| 14 | Turso | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 6.7% | #5.0 | +0.85 |
| 15 | Gel | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
Turn this into your team dashboard
Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.