AI visibility report
Supabase ranks #3 in Databases & Data Infrastructure AI search.
Outside the top three on 13 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.
PingCAP is cited on 6 of those losses.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for Supabase.
Also benchmarked
Supabase appears in another vertical
Track Supabase across these prompts daily.
Start free trial#3 among 15 vendors · still absent from 95.3% of tracked prompt responses
Top-3 citations across 150 prompt × platform pairs
Peer Ranking
Key Metrics
Platform Breakdown
ChatGPT
Google AI Mode
Gemini Search
Bing Copilot
Perplexity
GrokVisible, but narrative can improve. Supabase ranks #3 on presence but #4 on sentiment. The brand appears relatively often, but competitors may be getting more favorable language when they appear.
Where Supabase is losing
Prompts where competitors are visible and Supabase is not.
These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.
Where Supabase is winning5
Which serverless database platforms maintain the best read/write throughput under sustained load with reliable autoscaling?
Avg # 1.0 · 1 platform
Which developer-focused database platforms handle schema migrations with CI/CD pipeline tooling out of the box?
Avg # 1.0 · 1 platform
Which cloud-native database platforms handle connection pooling best for serverless workloads with unpredictable connection spikes?
Avg # 2.0 · 1 platform
Which developer-focused database platforms integrate best with IaC tools so database provisioning and config can be version-controlled?
Avg # 2.0 · 1 platform
Which developer-focused databases offer the best local development experience that actually mirrors the production setup?
Avg # 2.0 · 1 platform
Where Supabase is losing5
Which document databases handle schema evolution most smoothly — without requiring migration scripts for every change?
Competitors on 4 platforms
Track this promptWhich time-series databases maintain query performance best at 10 million events per second ingestion over long retention periods?
Competitors on 4 platforms
Track this promptWhich globally distributed SQL databases are worth evaluating for a latency-sensitive SaaS product compared to a traditional single-region setup?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhich distributed SQL platforms support migrating from a legacy relational database with minimal downtime for a production application?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhich columnar databases handle mixed OLAP and OLTP workloads well — when does it make sense to use one over a standard row-store?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this prompt
Track Supabase daily before the next report refresh.
Track these gapsResearch dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ
Overview
Supabase is an open-source PostgreSQL development platform founded in 2020 by Paul Copplestone and Ant Wilson, and backed by Y Combinator, Accel, and Peak XV. It provides a fully managed backend-as-a-service that bundles a hosted Postgres database with authentication, auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, edge functions, and vector embeddings—all accessible through a unified dashboard and multi-language SDKs. Built on enterprise-grade open-source components including PostgreSQL, PostgREST, and GoTrue, it supports both managed cloud hosting and self-deployment. With over 4 million developers and 3.5 million databases globally, Supabase became the default backend for leading AI coding platforms by 2025. As of October 2025, it holds a $5 billion valuation after raising over $500 million in total funding.
Supabase is the open-source Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated hosted PostgreSQL database, authentication, auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, serverless edge functions, and vector embeddings into a single integrated backend platform. It is built on open-source components (PostgreSQL, PostgREST, GoTrue, Elixir Realtime) and supports both managed cloud and self-hosted deployments, making it a full-featured, lock-in-free Firebase alternative for modern web, mobile, and AI applications.
Key Facts
- Founded
- 2020
- HQ
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Founders
- Paul Copplestone, Ant Wilson
- Employees
- 200-300
- Funding
- >$500M
- ARR
- ~$70M
- Customers
- 4M+ developers
- Valuation
- $5B
- Status
- Private
Target users
Key Capabilities10
- Dedicated hosted PostgreSQL database per project with full SQL access and extensions
- Built-in authentication supporting email/password, magic links, phone OTP, social OAuth, and enterprise SSO
- Auto-generated RESTful and GraphQL APIs derived from the database schema via PostgREST and pg_graphql
- Realtime subscriptions over WebSocket for live database change broadcasts to authorized clients
- Edge Functions (serverless, Deno-based) for custom backend logic without server management
- File and media storage API backed by S3 with PostgreSQL-managed permissions
- Vector embeddings and pgvector support for AI/semantic search and RAG pipelines
- Row Level Security (RLS) for granular, policy-based data access control
- Local development CLI with Docker-based environment mirroring cloud setup
- MCP server enabling AI agents and LLM tools to interact with Supabase projects
Key Use Cases8
- SaaS application backend development
- AI and LLM-powered applications with vector search and RAG pipelines
- Mobile and web apps requiring integrated auth, storage, and realtime data
- Rapid prototyping and MVP development
- Multiplayer and collaborative real-time applications
- Self-hosted open-source alternative to proprietary BaaS platforms
- Enterprise applications requiring SOC 2, HIPAA, and ISO 27001 compliance
- Vibe coding and AI-assisted app generation workflows (Bolt, Lovable, Figma)
Supabase customer outcomes
90% codebase reduction (730K to 95K LOC); deployment time from 12–15 min to seconds; 100x peak traffic load test passed
Migrated from MongoDB and AWS Elastic Beanstalk to Supabase, drastically reducing codebase size and achieving near-instant deployments; the platform handled 100x peak traffic during load testing with no database issues.
$1M revenue in 5 months
A bootstrapped founder built an AI application on Supabase and scaled it to $1 million in revenue within five months of launch without dedicated infrastructure teams.
1 million users in 7 months
Used Supabase Auth and row-level security to reach one million users within seven months while maintaining secure, scalable data access.
Recent Trend
How AI describes Supabase3
Database Comparison Guide 2026: MySQL vs PostgreSQL vs MongoDB vs Redis vs SQLite vs Supabase — OnlineTools4Free Research | OnlineTools4Free 5. Interpret results in terms of scalability, latency variance, and operational risk, not just raw thr...
What tools and benchmarks help compare database platforms for high-concurrency transactional workloads before committing to one?
The best developer-focused databases for local development that closely mirror production are PostgreSQL-based solutions like Database Lab Engine, Neon, and Supabase Local Dev.
Which developer-focused databases offer the best local development experience that actually mirrors the production setup?
Fastest to spin up and connect for a Node.js SaaS backend: _Turso (libSQL) and Supabase_ are the quickest to get running, but Neon offers the best long-term developer workflow with Postgres branching and scale-to-zero.
What's the fastest serverless relational database to spin up and connect to a Node.js backend for a new SaaS app?
Most cited sources8
8Branching | Supabase Docs
supabase.com·Product Page
- 6
Declarative database schemas | Supabase Docs
supabase.com·Documentation
- 3
Terraform provider | Supabase Features
supabase.com·Documentation
- 3
Database Migrations | Supabase Docs
supabase.com·Documentation
- 2
Terraform Provider | Supabase Docs
supabase.com·Documentation
- 2
Local Development & CLI | Supabase Docs
supabase.com·Documentation
Alternatives in Databases & Data Infrastructure6
Supabase positions itself as the open-source Firebase alternative built on PostgreSQL, emphasizing developer velocity ('build in a weekend, scale to millions'), no vendor lock-in, and a fully integrated backend platform.
- It differentiates from proprietary BaaS providers through open-source transparency and self-hosting capability, and from pure-database competitors by bundling auth, storage, realtime subscriptions, edge functions, and vector embeddings alongside Postgres.
- By 2025 it had emerged as the default backend for AI-driven 'vibe coding' tools including Bolt, Lovable, and Figma, with approximately 30% of new signups attributable to AI workloads.
Reviews
Praised
- Fast setup and onboarding
- All backend essentials bundled in one platform
- Excellent documentation and developer experience
- Generous free tier for prototyping
- Open-source transparency and self-hosting option
- Full Postgres with Row Level Security
- Strong AI and vector embedding support
- Intuitive dashboard enabling non-SQL database management
Criticized
- Free-tier projects pause after 7 days of inactivity
- Compute billed separately, causing billing surprises
- No built-in database backup for free users
- Occasional service outages affecting production projects
- Storage and auth feature maturity gaps for complex enterprise use cases
- Limited free-tier customer support responsiveness
User sentiment across G2 and Product Hunt is broadly positive, with developers consistently praising Supabase's comprehensive backend feature set, intuitive dashboard, quality documentation, and rapid time-to-productivity. The open-source Postgres foundation earns particular trust. G2 rates it 4.7/5 from 31 verified reviews. Product Hunt reviewers highlight fast onboarding and the value of having auth, storage, and realtime in one place. Recurring criticisms include free-tier project pausing, billing complexity around compute and storage overages, occasional service outages, and reported gaps in support responsiveness for free users.
Pricing
Four tiers: Free (500 MB database, 50K auth MAUs, 1 GB file storage, 500K edge function invocations; projects pause after 7 days of inactivity); Pro ($25/month: 8 GB database, 100K MAUs, 100 GB storage, 2M edge function invocations, daily backups; usage-based overages apply at $0.125/GB storage and $0.00325 per extra MAU); Team ($599/month: centralized billing, org-level permissions, SOC 2 compliance reports, priority support); Enterprise (custom pricing covering Multigres, HIPAA compliance, dedicated infrastructure, and SLAs). Compute add-ons are billed separately on all paid tiers.
Limitations
- Free-tier projects pause automatically after 7 days of inactivity, making them unsuitable for always-on production use.
- Compute is billed separately per project server and is not covered by the spend cap, creating potential for unexpected charges.
- No built-in database backup for free-tier users.
- Some reviewers note gaps in storage and authentication maturity for complex enterprise scenarios.
- Horizontal scaling (sharding) requires the forthcoming Multigres add-on, not yet generally available.
- Occasional platform outages have been flagged in community and Trustpilot reviews, with free-tier support being limited.
- Vendor dependency risk exists for hosted users, though mitigated by self-hosting support.
Frequently asked questions
Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic
Topic Coverage
Prompt-Level Results
| Prompt | Bing Copilot | Perplexity | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini Search | Grok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capability0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
Which globally distributed SQL databases are worth evaluating for a latency-sensitive SaaS product compared to a traditional single-region setup? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What in-memory caching tools integrate best with persistent databases — and which are worth adding versus just optimizing primary database queries? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which managed database platforms offer the best multi-region replication with automatic conflict resolution for write-write scenarios? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What are the best dedicated vector databases, and how do they compare to adding vector search extensions to an existing relational database? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which columnar databases handle mixed OLAP and OLTP workloads well — when does it make sense to use one over a standard row-store? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Developer Experience2/5 cited (40%) | ||||||
Which cloud-native database platforms handle connection pooling best for serverless workloads with unpredictable connection spikes? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which ORMs and query builders offer the best TypeScript experience for a distributed SQL database? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which time-series databases have the best query authoring and debugging experience for teams coming from relational databases? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which document databases handle schema evolution most smoothly — without requiring migration scripts for every change? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which developer-focused databases offer the best local development experience that actually mirrors the production setup? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Integrations & Ecosystem1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
Which developer-focused database platforms integrate best with IaC tools so database provisioning and config can be version-controlled? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What tools sync data from a primary operational database to an analytics warehouse for real-time reporting without heavy ETL infrastructure? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which cloud database platforms support change data capture for streaming row-level changes to a message queue or event bus with low latency? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which managed database platforms have the best ORM and query builder compatibility for JavaScript and Python ecosystems? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which managed database platforms make multi-cloud portability practical — so moving between cloud providers isn't a nightmare? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Performance & Reliability1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
Which managed database services offer the best backup and point-in-time recovery for production applications handling financial transactions? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which serverless database platforms maintain the best read/write throughput under sustained load with reliable autoscaling? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What tools and benchmarks help compare database platforms for high-concurrency transactional workloads before committing to one? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which time-series databases maintain query performance best at 10 million events per second ingestion over long retention periods? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which distributed SQL databases handle automatic failover most reliably when a node goes down — with the fastest recovery times? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Setup & First Run2/5 cited (40%) | ||||||
What's the fastest serverless relational database to spin up and connect to a Node.js backend for a new SaaS app? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which distributed SQL platforms support migrating from a legacy relational database with minimal downtime for a production application? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
I'm evaluating managed cloud databases versus self-hosted options for a seed-stage product — what should I look at? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which developer-focused database platforms handle schema migrations with CI/CD pipeline tooling out of the box? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which database platforms support branching so I can get a fresh isolated database copy per pull request for feature development? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.
Track prompt changesVertical Ranking
| # | Brand | PresencePres. | Share of VoiceSoV | DocsDocs | BlogBlog | MentionsMent. | Avg PosPos | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PingCAP | 6.7% | 23.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | 6.0% | #4.7 | +0.28 |
| 2 | CockroachDB | 5.3% | 14.9% | 0.7% | 2.7% | 1.3% | #3.0 | +0.33 |
| 3 | Supabase | 4.7% | 16.2% | 4.0% | 0.7% | 18.7% | #2.8 | +0.71 |
| 4 | ClickHouse | 4.0% | 12.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10.0% | #3.9 | +0.38 |
| 5 | MongoDB | 2.7% | 6.8% | 2.0% | 0.0% | 27.3% | #2.6 | +0.59 |
| 6 | QuestDB | 2.7% | 8.1% | 0.0% | 2.7% | 5.3% | #3.0 | +0.67 |
| 7 | PlanetScale | 2.0% | 6.8% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 18.0% | #4.6 | +0.82 |
| 8 | Timescale | 1.3% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.7% | #7.0 | +0.68 |
| 9 | Xata | 1.3% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 2.7% | #8.5 | +0.60 |
| 10 | Fauna | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.3% | #1.0 | +0.20 |
| 11 | Neon | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 22.7% | #1.0 | +0.90 |
| 12 | Redis | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 12.7% | #2.0 | +0.00 |
| 13 | SingleStore | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 5.3% | #3.0 | +0.20 |
| 14 | Turso | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 6.7% | #5.0 | +0.85 |
| 15 | Gel | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
Turn this into your team dashboard
Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.