AI visibility report
AI visibility report for Semaphore in CI/CD & Build Systems.
Outside the top three on 20 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.
CircleCI is cited on 10 of those losses.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for Semaphore.
Track Semaphore across these prompts daily.
Start free trialStill absent from 98% of tracked prompt responses
Top-3 citations across 150 prompt × platform pairs
Peer Ranking
Key Metrics
Platform Breakdown
Bing Copilot
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AI Mode
Gemini Search
GrokHow to read this. Semaphore appears in 2% of tracked prompt responses. Presence is absolute coverage; share of voice is relative citation share; sentiment measures tone only when the brand appears.
Where Semaphore is losing
Prompts where competitors are visible and Semaphore is not.
These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.
Where Semaphore is winning1
What tools or approaches let you benchmark build execution speed across different CI platforms for the same test suite?
Avg # 2.0 · 2 platforms
Where Semaphore is losing5
I'm evaluating fully managed CI/CD services versus self-hosted build systems for a startup — what are the key trade-offs and what should I look at?
Competitors on 4 platforms
Track this promptWhich CI tools let developers run the exact same pipeline definitions locally for a tight local feedback loop before pushing?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhat's the fastest CI/CD platform to set up for a monorepo with 15 microservices?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhich CI platforms support GPU-dependent ML training jobs in a build pipeline without requiring self-hosted runners?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhich managed CI platforms have the smoothest onboarding experience when migrating a team of 30 engineers from a self-hosted system?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this prompt
Track Semaphore daily before the next report refresh.
Track these gapsResearch dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ
Overview
Semaphore is a cloud-native CI/CD platform founded in 2012 by Darko Fabijan and Marko Anastasov and headquartered in Novi Sad, Serbia. Operated by Semaphore Technologies doo, it offers fully managed cloud, hybrid, and self-hosted deployment options. The platform is designed to maximize build speed and pipeline reliability, running on optimized bare-metal infrastructure. In February 2025, Semaphore open-sourced its core platform under Apache 2.0, adding a free Community Edition alongside its Cloud and Enterprise offerings. It serves over 300,000 organizations globally—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—and is certified SOC 2 and ISO 27001. Key differentiators include raw build performance, pay-per-second compute pricing, flaky test detection, and AI-driven pipeline analysis.
Semaphore is an AI-driven CI/CD platform offering fast, reliable pipeline execution across cloud, hybrid, and self-hosted environments. It provides a visual pipeline editor, parallel job execution, flaky test detection, deployment automations with approval gates, and deep observability—all under a pay-per-second compute model. Its 2025 open-source release makes the core platform available for self-hosting without cost.
Key Facts
- Founded
- 2012
- HQ
- Novi Sad, Serbia
- Founders
- Darko Fabijan, Marko Anastasov
- Employees
- 11-50
- Customers
- 300,000+
- Status
- Private
Target users
Key Capabilities10
- YAML-based parallel pipeline configuration with visual workflow editor
- Bare-metal and optimized cloud runners for high-speed builds
- Flaky test detection and automated test reporting
- Self-hosted agents for hybrid and on-premises deployments
- Pipeline promotions and approval gates for controlled deployments
- Monorepo-aware change detection and selective pipeline triggers
- Built-in secrets management and environment-level access controls
- AI-assisted failure analysis and MCP server integration
- Metrics and observability dashboards (DORA metrics, build duration trends)
- Open-source Community Edition under Apache 2.0 (self-hostable)
Key Use Cases8
- Automated CI testing for web, mobile (iOS/Android), and backend services
- Docker image build, test, and push pipelines
- Kubernetes deployment automation with canary and rolling strategies
- Monorepo CI/CD with change-based pipeline triggers
- Migration from Jenkins or GitHub Actions to a managed platform
- Enterprise on-premises CI/CD with Semaphore Enterprise Edition
- Open-source project CI/CD via Community Edition self-hosting
- Compliance-sensitive pipelines requiring SOC 2 and ISO 27001 controls
Semaphore customer outcomes
38% cost reduction, 2x faster CI pipeline
Migrated from CircleCI to Semaphore, cutting CI pipeline duration in half and reducing CI infrastructure costs.
70% faster packaging builds, 75% faster release pipelines, 50% lower resource usage
Migrated from Jenkins to Semaphore, accelerating packaging build times and release pipelines while significantly cutting resource usage.
80–83% build time reduction, 20% cost savings
Replaced Jenkins with Semaphore, dramatically reducing build times and achieving measurable CI cost savings.
75% decrease in build time
Adopted Semaphore and achieved substantial reductions in build duration and infrastructure costs.
25% reduced CI costs, 15–20% reduced build time
Moved to Semaphore and reduced both CI costs and build times through optimized pipeline configuration.
15-minute builds reduced to 2.5 minutes
Replaced CircleCI with Semaphore, achieving dramatically faster build times at lower total cost.
Recent Trend
How AI describes Semaphore3
Semaphore CI : * Why it's fast: Offers a specific `change_in` function that simplifies monorepo workflow modeling by tracking changes across subdirectories.
Which build systems handle incremental builds and caching best for large TypeScript monorepos to avoid rebuilding unchanged packages?
Semaphore Semaphore offers "automatic horizontal parallelization," which is very hands-off for developers.
Which CI platforms make it easiest to configure parallel test execution for a Node.js project from scratch?
Benchmarking build execution speed across different CI platforms (e.g., GitHub Actions, CircleCI, GitLab CI, Semaphore) requires isolating the test execution from platform-specific overheads like queuing time or network latency.
Which CI tools let developers run the exact same pipeline definitions locally for a tight local feedback loop before pushing?
Most cited sources1
Alternatives in CI/CD & Build Systems6
Semaphore positions itself as the fastest and most cost-effective standalone CI/CD platform, competing primarily on raw build speed (benchmarked at ~5m vs. 7–13m for rivals), pay-per-second compute pricing, and open-source transparency.
- Its 2025 open-source release under Apache 2.0 directly challenges vendor lock-in concerns associated with GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and CircleCI, while its bare-metal infrastructure differentiates it from container-only rivals.
- Semaphore targets engineering teams that have outgrown platform-bundled CI/CD and need a dedicated, high-performance, compliance-ready pipeline platform.
Reviews
Praised
- Exceptional build speed on bare-metal servers
- Fast, technically skilled customer support
- Simple and intuitive pipeline setup
- Reliable and stable pipeline execution
- Cost-effective pay-per-use pricing
- Visual pipeline editor and workflow visualization
- Flaky test detection tooling
- Strong parallelization capabilities
Criticized
- YAML configuration complexity for advanced pipelines
- Semaphore 2.0 UI less intuitive than v1
- Narrower third-party integration marketplace vs. GitHub Actions
- Documentation gaps for non-developer operators
- Some v1 features missing in v2 at initial release
Semaphore holds a 4.7/5 on G2 (193 reviews) with 87% five-star ratings, and a 5/5 on Capterra (14 reviews). Reviewers consistently praise build speed, responsive technical support, and pipeline simplicity. Recurring criticisms include YAML complexity for advanced setups, a v2 UI learning curve compared to v1, and thinner integration coverage versus platform-native CI tools. The platform claims 98% CSAT on its pricing page.
Pricing
Semaphore uses a pay-per-minute compute model with no seat-based subscription. Ubuntu ARM starts at $0.003/min (2 vCPU); Ubuntu x64 at $0.0075/min (2 vCPU); macOS at $0.09/min (4 vCPU); self-hosted agents at $0.0025/min. New accounts receive $15 free credits/month (~2,000 Ubuntu x64 minutes). Artifacts are free up to 20 GB/month egress and 100 GB storage. Optional add-ons include support plans ($50–$750/month), customer success tiers ($125–$2,000/month), and on-demand engineering access ($900–$2,000/block). Annual billing discounts are available. The Community Edition (self-hosted open source) is free under Apache 2.0.
Limitations
- Some reviewers note that YAML pipeline configuration can become complex despite the visual editor.
- The Semaphore 2.0 UI was cited by a subset of Capterra and G2 reviewers as less intuitive than v1.
- The native integration marketplace is narrower than platform-bundled tools like GitHub Actions or GitLab CI.
- Documentation depth for non-developer operators has been called out as an area for improvement.
- The company is small (11–50 employees per Crunchbase), which may limit enterprise support capacity, though modular paid support tiers are available.
Frequently asked questions
Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic
Topic Coverage
Prompt-Level Results
| Prompt | Perplexity | Google AI Mode | Gemini Search | ChatGPT | Bing Copilot | Grok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capability0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
Which build systems enforce consistent dependency versions and prevent supply chain issues at the build stage? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which enterprise build systems handle dynamic pipeline generation best — generating jobs based on which packages changed in a monorepo? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which CI/CD platforms have the best native support for running iOS and Android mobile builds without needing self-hosted runners? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which CI platforms support GPU-dependent ML training jobs in a build pipeline without requiring self-hosted runners? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which CI/CD platforms support multi-cloud and hybrid deployment targets without tying you to a single cloud provider? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Developer Experience0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
Which CI tools let developers run the exact same pipeline definitions locally for a tight local feedback loop before pushing? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which build systems handle incremental builds and caching best for large TypeScript monorepos to avoid rebuilding unchanged packages? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What CI platforms give engineering teams the best tools for debugging flaky tests and intermittent pipeline failures in a cloud environment? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which YAML-based CI systems have the lowest learning curve for developers new to pipeline-as-code? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What tools help teams manage secrets and environment variables safely across many CI/CD pipelines without duplicating configuration? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Integrations & Ecosystem0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
Which build systems integrate best with artifact registries and container image repositories for versioning and promotion across environments? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which CI providers make pipeline migration easiest — are there any portable pipeline standards that reduce lock-in when switching? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which CI/CD platforms have the best integrations for sending build failure notifications to project management tools and chat platforms? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What security scanning and SAST tools integrate best into an existing build pipeline without significantly increasing build times? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which CI/CD platforms have the deepest native integrations with container orchestration clusters and serverless deployment targets? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Performance & Reliability2/5 cited (40%) | ||||||
Which CI platforms or techniques reduce pipeline cold-start times most effectively when using ephemeral containerized runners? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What tools or approaches let you benchmark build execution speed across different CI platforms for the same test suite? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand was cited | Your brand was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which managed CI/CD providers offer the strongest SLAs and uptime track record for teams evaluating reliability before committing? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which CI platforms scale best to handle hundreds of concurrent pipelines during peak hours without queueing delays? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which build tools offer remote caching for large polyglot monorepos — and what kind of build time reduction is realistic? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Setup & First Run0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
I'm evaluating fully managed CI/CD services versus self-hosted build systems for a startup — what are the key trade-offs and what should I look at? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What's the fastest CI/CD platform to set up for a monorepo with 15 microservices? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which CI platforms make it easiest to configure parallel test execution for a Node.js project from scratch? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which managed CI platforms have the smoothest onboarding experience when migrating a team of 30 engineers from a self-hosted system? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which modern cloud-native CI platforms make it easiest to migrate from a self-hosted build setup without breaking existing workflows? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.
Track prompt changesVertical Ranking
| # | Brand | PresencePres. | Share of VoiceSoV | DocsDocs | BlogBlog | MentionsMent. | Avg PosPos | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CircleCI | 16.0% | 27.6% | 4.7% | 8.0% | 49.3% | #4.7 | +0.40 |
| 2 | Buildkite | 10.0% | 18.7% | 5.3% | 0.0% | 24.7% | #2.7 | +0.52 |
| 3 | GitHub | 9.3% | 13.0% | 5.3% | 0.7% | 66.7% | #4.0 | +0.59 |
| 4 | Harness | 8.0% | 14.6% | 0.0% | 6.0% | 17.3% | #4.8 | +0.43 |
| 5 | TeamCity | 4.0% | 4.9% | 0.0% | 4.0% | 0.0% | #2.7 | +0.51 |
| 6 | GitLab | 3.3% | 5.7% | 2.7% | 1.3% | 62.0% | #1.9 | +0.30 |
| 7 | Nx | 2.0% | 4.1% | 2.0% | 0.0% | 12.0% | #3.2 | +0.67 |
| 8 | Semaphore | 2.0% | 4.9% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 4.0% | #3.5 | +0.60 |
| 9 | CloudBees | 2.0% | 2.4% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | #6.3 | +0.00 |
| 10 | Azure Pipelines | 1.3% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | #1.5 | +0.25 |
| 11 | Earthly | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | #2.0 | +0.40 |
| 12 | Dagger | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.0% | #3.0 | +0.40 |
| 13 | Turborepo | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 10.7% | #7.0 | +0.60 |
| 14 | Depot | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| 15 | Jenkins | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 38.0% | — | — |
| 16 | Travis CI | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.3% | — | — |
Turn this into your team dashboard
Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.