AI visibility report
Checkly ranks #11 in Testing & QA AI search.
Outside the top three on 18 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.
BrowserStack is cited on 9 of those losses.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for Checkly.
Track Checkly across these prompts daily.
Start free trial#11 among 12 vendors · still absent from 97.3% of tracked prompt responses
Top-3 citations across 150 prompt × platform pairs
Peer Ranking
Key Metrics
Platform Breakdown
Grok
Perplexity
Bing Copilot
Gemini Search
ChatGPT
Google AI ModeVisible, but narrative can improve. Checkly ranks #11 on presence but #12 on sentiment. The brand appears relatively often, but competitors may be getting more favorable language when they appear.
Where Checkly is losing
Prompts where competitors are visible and Checkly is not.
These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.
Where Checkly is winning1
What are the best tools for setting up synthetic monitoring and uptime checks for a production API with alerting from day one?
Avg # 41.0 · 1 platform
Where Checkly is losing5
Which end-to-end testing tools support both mobile web and native mobile testing from a single test suite — what are the real options here?
Competitors on 5 platforms
Track this promptWhich QA platforms handle test parallelization across multiple browsers with the least setup overhead for developers?
Competitors on 5 platforms
Track this promptWhich cloud testing platforms handle test infrastructure reliability best — which ones automatically recover when a remote browser environment goes down mid-run?
Competitors on 4 platforms
Track this promptWhich browser-based testing platforms support running tests against localhost or behind-firewall staging environments without complex tunneling setup?
Competitors on 4 platforms
Track this promptWhich codeless test automation platforms handle dynamic and heavily JavaScript-driven UIs best — what are the limitations to watch for?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this prompt
Track Checkly daily before the next report refresh.
Track these gapsResearch dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ
Overview
Checkly is a developer-first synthetic monitoring and application reliability platform founded in 2018 and headquartered in Berlin, Germany. It enables engineering teams to write, version, and deploy API checks, Playwright-based browser monitors, and uptime checks as code using the Checkly CLI, Terraform, or Pulumi—a workflow it defines as Monitoring as Code (MaC). The platform covers the full reliability lifecycle: detecting issues across 20+ global locations, communicating outages via status pages and alerts, and resolving failures faster through OpenTelemetry-correlated traces and AI-powered root cause analysis (Rocky AI). Trusted by more than 1,000 companies including Vercel, CrowdStrike, Airbus, LinkedIn, and 1Password, Checkly has raised $32.25M in total funding led by Balderton Capital, Accel, and CRV, and has earned recognition as a Gartner Cool Vendor for its MaC approach.
Checkly is a Monitoring as Code platform that lets engineering teams write API checks, Playwright browser monitors, and uptime checks in JavaScript/TypeScript, then deploy and manage them from their code repository via the Checkly CLI, Terraform, or Pulumi. Checks run across 20+ global locations on a configurable schedule, with multi-channel alerting, branded status pages, OpenTelemetry-based distributed tracing, and AI-powered root cause analysis rounding out the reliability workflow from detection through resolution.
Key Facts
- Founded
- 2018
- HQ
- Berlin, Germany (remote-first; US office in New York, NY)
- Founders
- Hannes Lenke, Tim Nolet
- Employees
- 44-55
- Funding
- $32.25M
- Customers
- 1,000+
- Status
- Private
Target users
Key Capabilities10
- Monitoring as Code (MaC) workflow via Checkly CLI in JS/TS
- Playwright-native browser and synthetic monitoring checks
- API and multi-step HTTP checks with assertions and setup/teardown scripts
- Uptime monitoring across HTTP, TCP, DNS, ICMP, and Heartbeat protocols
- OpenTelemetry tracing integration for end-to-end root cause analysis
- AI-powered root cause analysis via Rocky AI agent
- Branded status pages with automated incident updates
- Multi-channel alerting with intelligent routing (Slack, PagerDuty, SMS, Webhooks)
- Terraform and Pulumi IaC providers for infrastructure-as-code monitoring
- 20+ global check execution locations with parallel and round-robin scheduling
Key Use Cases8
- Production synthetic monitoring of critical user flows (login, checkout, onboarding)
- API endpoint health and performance monitoring
- Pre-deployment and CI/CD gate testing via Checkly CLI
- Uptime and availability monitoring for public and internal services
- Incident alerting, escalation, and status communication to end-users
- Monitoring-as-Code for platform and SRE team standardization
- OpenTelemetry-correlated trace debugging for faster MTTR
- AI-agent-assisted monitor creation and management
Checkly customer outcomes
60% reduction in time spent on monitoring
TrueLayer's DevOps team automated external API monitoring using Checkly's Terraform provider, eliminating manual check creation and enabling fully automated check generation tied to domain creation.
20% engineering time savings
Kizen adopted Checkly for production and staging synthetic monitoring with Playwright integration, enabling the team to catch issues before production deploys and eliminating production incidents after deployment.
Recent Trend
How AI describes Checkly3
The short answer: Checkly, Better Stack, UptimeRobot, and Datadog Synthetics consistently rank as the top options for production API monitoring with alerting.
What are the best tools for setting up synthetic monitoring and uptime checks for a production API with alerting from day one?
The key takeaway: Datadog Synthetics, New Relic Synthetics, Better Stack, Grafana Cloud/k6, and Checkly offer the most seamless incident‑management and alert‑routing integrations when synthetic checks detect downtime.
Which testing platforms integrate best with incident management and alerting tools when a synthetic monitor detects downtime?
Checkly : Best for developer-focused "monitoring as code," with strong native integration for Slack, PagerDuty, and webhooks.
Which enterprise QA platforms integrate best with existing test case management and bug tracking systems — what should I evaluate?
Most cited sources5
1Cypress vs Selenium vs Playwright vs Puppeteer: Speed
checklyhq.com·Blog Post
- 1
Compare an Alternative To Datadog In Checkly
checklyhq.com·Landing Page
- 1
Synthetic Monitoring - Concepts, Benefits & Challenges
checklyhq.com·Landing Page
- 1
Playwright vs Cypress - Detailed comparison [2024]
checklyhq.com·Documentation
- 1
How to Manage Authentication in Playwright
checklyhq.com·Documentation
Alternatives in Testing & QA6
Checkly positions itself as the developer-native 'Monitoring as Code' (MaC) platform, differentiating on a code-first workflow where engineers write, version, and deploy synthetic monitors in JavaScript/TypeScript alongside their application code via the Checkly CLI.
- Unlike legacy APM vendors (Datadog, New Relic, Dynatrace) it targets directly on its comparison pages, Checkly emphasizes Playwright-native browser checks and OpenTelemetry tracing rather than broad observability suites.
- Against pure QA automation tools, it uniquely bridges shift-left testing and production monitoring in a single pipeline, earning Gartner 'Cool Vendor' recognition for its MaC category.
- Its developer-first brand, remote-first culture, and strong OSS/angel investor network (Guillermo Rauch, ex-GitHub/Twilio executives) reinforce credibility with modern DevOps and SRE teams.
Reviews
Praised
- Monitoring-as-code workflow
- Playwright integration depth
- Seamless CI/CD and GitHub fit
- Ease of initial setup
- Flexible multi-channel alerting
- Fast and responsive customer support
- Global check location coverage
- Version-controlled monitoring infrastructure
Criticized
- Rigid pricing tiers with limited mid-plan flexibility
- Costs scale quickly at higher frequencies or check volumes
- Steep learning curve for teams new to JavaScript/TypeScript
- Advanced features (Traces) locked to Enterprise plan
- Documentation gaps for advanced use cases
- Occasional platform downtime or stability concerns
G2 reviewers consistently praise Checkly's monitoring-as-code approach, deep Playwright integration, seamless CI/CD fit, and ease of initial setup. The alerting system—particularly Slack and PagerDuty integrations—receives strong marks for reliability and flexibility. Recurring criticisms focus on pricing rigidity between plan tiers (especially for teams scaling beyond Starter but not yet filling Team-plan limits), cost growth at higher check frequencies, and a learning curve for teams new to writing tests in JavaScript or TypeScript. Some users also note occasional documentation gaps for advanced features and wish for more granular usage-based pricing.
Pricing
Four-tier model billed monthly or annually. Hobby: free (10 uptime monitors, 6 locations, 1,000 browser / 10,000 API check runs/month).
- Starter
$24/month (50 uptime monitors, 3,000 browser / 25,000 API runs, SMS alerts).
- Team
$64/month (75 uptime monitors, 22 locations, 12,000 browser / 100,000 API runs, all alert channels).
- Enterprise
custom pricing with private locations, parallel scheduling, 1-second check frequency, 180-day data retention, SAML/SSO, 99.9% uptime SLA, and dedicated customer success. Communicate (status pages) and Resolve (AI RCA) are modular add-ons priced separately per tier. Additional check runs purchasable in blocks. Available on AWS Marketplace.
Limitations
- Full platform value requires JavaScript or TypeScript fluency, creating a steeper onboarding curve for teams unfamiliar with code-first testing.
- Pricing tiers are noted by G2 reviewers as rigid, with limited flexibility for teams whose usage falls between Starter and Team plan limits, and costs can scale quickly at higher check frequencies.
- Advanced tracing features are available only on Enterprise plans as add-ons.
- Some users cite documentation gaps for advanced scenarios.
- The platform focuses on external synthetic monitoring and does not provide full observability (logs, metrics, infrastructure) out of the box, positioning it as complementary to rather than a replacement for broader APM or SIEM tools.
Frequently asked questions
Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic
Topic Coverage
Prompt-Level Results
| Prompt | Perplexity | Bing Copilot | Gemini Search | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Grok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capability1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
What are the best load testing tools for a GraphQL API with complex nested queries and mutations — what should I look at? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which end-to-end testing tools support both mobile web and native mobile testing from a single test suite — what are the real options here? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which codeless test automation platforms handle dynamic and heavily JavaScript-driven UIs best — what are the limitations to watch for? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which visual testing platforms are best at detecting meaningful UI regressions without flagging irrelevant pixel-level changes? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which automated testing platforms handle complex auth flows like OAuth, MFA, and SSO most reliably — what should teams evaluate? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Developer Experience0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
Which AI-assisted test generation tools actually save time in practice without creating a long-term maintenance burden — what are the options worth trying? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which modern end-to-end testing frameworks have solved the worst pain points around writing and maintaining tests — what are teams switching to? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What testing tools are best suited for a small engineering team with no dedicated QA engineer who still wants meaningful automated test coverage? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which QA platforms handle test parallelization across multiple browsers with the least setup overhead for developers? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which testing platforms offer the best debugging experience when a flaky end-to-end test fails in CI — which ones help you diagnose it fastest? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Integrations & Ecosystem0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
Which enterprise QA platforms integrate best with existing test case management and bug tracking systems — what should I evaluate? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which testing platforms integrate best with incident management and alerting tools when a synthetic monitor detects downtime? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which testing platforms have the best integrations for surfacing test results and coverage reports directly in the pull request review process? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which testing tools have the best integrations with AI coding assistants for generating useful test code — what's the state of the ecosystem? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which browser-based testing platforms support running tests against localhost or behind-firewall staging environments without complex tunneling setup? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Performance & Reliability2/5 cited (40%) | ||||||
What tools and platforms help reduce flakiness in automated UI tests at scale without relying on indefinite retries? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What tools do teams use to keep end-to-end test suite execution time under a reasonable threshold for a mid-sized SaaS product in CI? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which browser-based testing platforms have the least impact on CI pipeline speed when running full test suites on every pull request? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
What are the best load testing tools for a system that handles thousands of concurrent WebSocket connections — what do teams typically reach for? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which cloud testing platforms handle test infrastructure reliability best — which ones automatically recover when a remote browser environment goes down mid-run? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Setup & First Run1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
What's the fastest way to set up visual regression testing for a design system without a dedicated QA team — which tools handle this well? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What are the best end-to-end testing frameworks for getting browser tests running in CI for a React app with a lot of dynamic content? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What are the best modern end-to-end testing frameworks for migrating from a legacy browser automation test suite — what should teams evaluate? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What are the best tools for setting up synthetic monitoring and uptime checks for a production API with alerting from day one? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand was cited |
Which cloud-based browser testing platforms have the simplest initial setup — which ones let you run your first test without significant configuration? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.
Track prompt changesVertical Ranking
| # | Brand | PresencePres. | Share of VoiceSoV | DocsDocs | BlogBlog | MentionsMent. | Avg PosPos | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BrowserStack | 19.3% | 28.3% | 6.0% | 0.0% | 41.3% | #13.0 | +0.39 |
| 2 | QA Wolf | 12.0% | 9.2% | 0.0% | 11.3% | 8.0% | #20.2 | +0.25 |
| 3 | Sauce Labs | 8.7% | 13.1% | 3.3% | 8.0% | 24.0% | #38.9 | +0.31 |
| 4 | Applitools | 7.3% | 7.6% | 0.0% | 6.0% | 11.3% | #20.2 | +0.30 |
| 5 | Cypress | 6.7% | 7.6% | 5.3% | 1.3% | 56.7% | #21.3 | +0.31 |
| 6 | Katalon | 6.7% | 7.2% | 2.0% | 4.0% | 9.3% | #26.1 | +0.31 |
| 7 | Playwright | 6.0% | 6.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 72.7% | #35.8 | +0.13 |
| 8 | Percy | 5.3% | 6.0% | 0.0% | 5.3% | 9.3% | #5.2 | +0.39 |
| 9 | mabl | 4.7% | 9.2% | 2.0% | 2.7% | 21.3% | #42.9 | +0.30 |
| 10 | Testim | 4.0% | 2.8% | 0.0% | 2.7% | 13.3% | #33.1 | +0.12 |
| 11 | Checkly | 2.7% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 0.7% | 6.0% | #43.6 | +0.03 |
| 12 | LambdaTest | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 26.7% | #47.0 | +0.70 |
Turn this into your team dashboard
Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.