AI visibility report
AI visibility report for Cline Bot Inc. in Autonomous Coding Agents.
Outside the top three on 14 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.
Augment Code is cited on 6 of those losses.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for Cline Bot Inc..
Track Cline Bot Inc. across these prompts daily.
Start free trialStill absent from 100% of tracked prompt responses
Top-3 citations across 125 prompt × platform pairs
Peer Ranking
Key Metrics
Platform Breakdown
Gemini Search
ChatGPT
Bing Copilot
Perplexity
Google AI ModeHow to read this. Cline Bot Inc. appears in 0% of tracked prompt responses. Presence is absolute coverage; share of voice is relative citation share; sentiment measures tone only when the brand appears.
Where Cline Bot Inc. is losing
Prompts where competitors are visible and Cline Bot Inc. is not.
These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.
Where Cline Bot Inc. is winning
No clear strengths identified yet.
Where Cline Bot Inc. is losing5
Which AI coding agents handle context window limitations most gracefully when working across dozens of files in an enterprise codebase?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhat AI coding agents support bring-your-own LLM provider so a platform team can route through an existing enterprise model contract?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhat agentic coding tools handle long-running tasks reliably — resuming after an interruption rather than starting over from scratch?
Competitors on 2 platforms
Track this promptWhich cloud coding agents integrate with CI pipelines to automatically attempt fixes when a build or test suite fails?
Competitors on 1 platform
Track this promptWhat autonomous coding agents run tasks inside a secure sandbox so a compromised prompt can't affect the host filesystem?
Competitors on 1 platform
Track this prompt
Track Cline Bot Inc. daily before the next report refresh.
Track these gapsResearch dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ
Overview
Cline Bot Inc. develops Cline, an open-source autonomous coding agent licensed under Apache 2.0 and distributed as a VS Code extension, a CLI, a JetBrains plugin (enterprise), and an embeddable SDK. Founded in 2024 by Saoud Rizwan and backed by $32M from Emergence Capital and Pace Capital, Cline has grown to 8M+ installs across platforms and 64k GitHub stars. Its core design principle is developer transparency and control: users bring their own API keys to any supported model provider, pay inference costs directly at provider rates, and see per-request token and cost breakdowns. The agent's Plan/Act workflow and human-in-the-loop approval model allow developers to review and approve every file edit and terminal command before execution. Enterprise customers gain SSO, RBAC, audit logs, and VPC or air-gapped deployment options, making Cline viable for regulated, zero-trust environments.
Cline is an open-source autonomous coding agent runtime available as a VS Code extension, CLI, JetBrains plugin, and Node.js SDK. It executes multi-step development tasks—editing files, running terminal commands, browsing the web, and orchestrating multi-agent teams—under explicit user approval at each step. The agent is fully model-agnostic, supporting BYOK across all major providers and local models, with real-time per-request cost tracking and no proprietary inference markup.
Key Facts
- Founded
- 2024
- HQ
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Founders
- Saoud Rizwan
- Employees
- 25-50
- Funding
- $32M
- Customers
- 8M+ installs across platforms
- Valuation
- $110M
- Status
- Private
Target users
Key Capabilities10
- Plan/Act mode toggle with human-in-the-loop approval for every file edit and terminal command
- Autonomous multi-file code editing with linter-aware fixes, diffs, and one-click undo checkpoints
- Terminal command execution with real-time output monitoring for builds, tests, and deployments
- Bring-your-own-key (BYOK) model-agnostic support across all major AI providers and local models
- Model Context Protocol (MCP) client with curated MCP Marketplace for extending agent capabilities
- CLI for headless CI/CD automation, cron-scheduled agents, and scripted pipelines
- Multi-agent orchestration via Kanban board with parallel worktrees and dependency chains
- Messaging platform connectors (Slack, Discord, Telegram, Linear) for remote agent interaction
- Enterprise tier: SSO/OIDC/SCIM, RBAC, centralized billing, audit logs, VPC and air-gapped deployment
- SDK for embedding the Cline agent runtime in custom products with plugin/tool hooks
Key Use Cases8
- Autonomous multi-file feature development from natural-language prompts
- Legacy codebase refactoring and framework migration across large monorepos
- CI/CD pipeline automation with scheduled or headless agent runs
- Security vulnerability identification and remediation with compliance-safe local processing
- Test generation and automated bug-fixing from error logs or failing test output
- Enterprise zero-trust environments requiring air-gapped or on-premise AI inference
- Multi-agent parallel task execution via Kanban board for sprint-scale workloads
- Developer productivity tooling embedded in custom enterprise platforms via the Cline SDK
Cline Bot Inc. customer outcomes
Samsung Electronics piloted Cline within its Device eXperience (DX) division—covering mobile and home appliance engineering units—using Claude 3.7 Sonnet via Cline to autonomously handle complex software development tasks. The initiative was part of Samsung's broader AI for All s
SAP natively integrated Cline with SAP AI Core as a first-class provider, enabling SAP BTP developers to use Cline with enterprise-grade foundation models (Claude, Gemini, GPT) under SAP's compliance and cost controls. The integration is featured in SAP's Architecture Center as a
Recent Trend
How AI describes Cline Bot Inc.
No concise AI response excerpt is available for this brand yet.
Most cited sources
No cited source mix is available for this brand yet.
Alternatives in Autonomous Coding Agents6
Cline positions itself as the open-source, model-agnostic autonomous coding agent that gives developers full transparency and control, in direct contrast to proprietary subscription-based tools like Cursor and GitHub Copilot.
- Its core differentiators are bring-your-own-key (BYOK) pricing with per-token cost visibility, Apache 2.0 open-source auditability, and zero vendor lock-in on either the agent runtime or the underlying AI model.
- For enterprise buyers—especially those in zero-trust, regulated, or air-gapped environments—Cline's local/client-side architecture is positioned as the only viable option, since code never leaves the customer's infrastructure.
- AAugment Code#19
- AAnthropic (Claude Code)#23
- Block (Goose)#33
- OpenAI (Codex CLI / Codex)#43
- CCursor (Anysphere)#62
- Factory (Droid)#52
Reviews
Praised
- Full per-request token and cost transparency
- Model agnosticism and BYOK flexibility across all major providers
- Apache 2.0 open-source auditability and self-hosting
- Human-in-the-loop approval for every file edit and command
- MCP marketplace and extensibility
- Workspace checkpoints with one-click restore
- CLI for CI/CD and cron automation
- No subscription fee or inference markup
Criticized
- Slower task execution speed than Cursor
- No built-in inline autocomplete suggestions
- API costs can spike unexpectedly for heavy users
- No spending caps or budget alerts for individuals
- UX polish less refined than dedicated AI IDEs
- JetBrains support requires Enterprise tier
- Output quality heavily dependent on chosen model
- Approval prompts add friction for routine low-risk tasks
Across independent editorial reviews in 2025–2026, Cline consistently earns strong recommendations as the best open-source VS Code coding agent for developers who prioritize model flexibility, cost transparency, and auditability. Reviewers at ToolStackerAI rate it 4.7/5, and vibecoding.gallery scores it 8.58/10 across six dimensions. Praise centers on BYOK freedom, the approvals-based safety model, MCP extensibility, workspace checkpoints, and the CLI for CI automation. Criticism focuses on slower execution speed versus Cursor, no built-in inline autocomplete, and the risk of unpredictable API costs for heavy users. Community sentiment (GitHub issues, Reddit r/cline) mirrors this: developers appreciate transparency and control but cite speed and UX polish as gaps relative to proprietary IDE alternatives.
Pricing
The open-source Individual tier is free: users install the VS Code extension or CLI at no cost and pay AI inference directly to their chosen provider at provider rates (typically $5–$30/day for active use with frontier models). There are no platform subscription fees or seat charges. An optional managed inference path via ClinePass lets teams consolidate billing through Cline at cost with no markup. The Enterprise tier is custom-priced (contact sales) and adds JetBrains extension, SSO/OIDC/SCIM provisioning, RBAC, centralized billing and usage dashboard, authentication and audit logs, VPC and self-hosted deployment, OpenTelemetry, SLA, and dedicated support.
Limitations
- Cline lacks built-in inline autocomplete, a differentiator of Cursor and GitHub Copilot for line-by-line suggestions.
- Task execution speed is slower than Cursor in benchmarks (~90s vs ~45s on comparable tasks).
- API costs for heavy users can exceed flat-rate subscriptions, and there are no built-in spending caps or budget alerts for individual users.
- Output quality is highly dependent on the connected model—cheaper or local models produce noticeably weaker results.
- The VS Code extension (open-source) does not include JetBrains support, which is gated behind the Enterprise tier.
- The human-approval-every-step workflow, while a security feature, adds friction for low-risk or repetitive tasks (mitigated by auto-approve mode).
- Multi-file refactoring accuracy, while strong, has been observed to occasionally miss files compared to some rivals.
Frequently asked questions
Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic
Topic Coverage
Prompt-Level Results
| Prompt | Gemini Search | ChatGPT | Bing Copilot | Perplexity | Google AI Mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capability0/5 cited (0%) | |||||
What AI coding agents handle multi-repo tasks well — making coordinated changes across a frontend and backend repo in a single session? | |||||
Which autonomous coding agents can reliably write and run tests, interpret failures, and self-correct without human intervention? | |||||
I'm looking for an agentic CLI that supports tool use like web search and shell execution during a coding task — what are my options? | |||||
What autonomous coding tools handle legacy codebases in dynamically typed languages best — Python 2 or older PHP specifically? | |||||
Which cloud coding agents are best for generating and merging pull requests asynchronously without a developer staying in the loop? | |||||
Developer Experience0/5 cited (0%) | |||||
Which autonomous coding agents give the best real-time feedback loop when running multi-step tasks so developers stay in control? | |||||
Which agentic IDEs have the smoothest experience for reviewing and approving AI-generated changes before they touch the main branch? | |||||
What AI coding agents do senior engineers prefer for refactoring large codebases without babysitting every intermediate step? | |||||
Which AI coding agents handle context window limitations most gracefully when working across dozens of files in an enterprise codebase? | |||||
What autonomous coding tools are best suited for a solo developer who wants to delegate routine feature work and focus on architecture? | |||||
Integrations & Ecosystem0/5 cited (0%) | |||||
Which cloud coding agents integrate with CI pipelines to automatically attempt fixes when a build or test suite fails? | |||||
Which autonomous coding agents integrate natively with popular code editors so devs can trigger agent tasks without leaving their IDE? | |||||
What AI coding agents support bring-your-own LLM provider so a platform team can route through an existing enterprise model contract? | |||||
Which agentic coding platforms integrate with project management tools so engineers can assign tickets directly to an AI agent to action? | |||||
What autonomous coding tools have the best ecosystem of community plugins for extending agent capabilities with custom tools and workflows? | |||||
Performance & Reliability0/5 cited (0%) | |||||
What autonomous coding agents run tasks inside a secure sandbox so a compromised prompt can't affect the host filesystem? | |||||
Which autonomous coding agents are most cost-efficient for high-volume use — minimising frontier LLM provider token spend per merged PR? | |||||
Which cloud coding agents have the best uptime and task success rates for a mid-size team running dozens of concurrent agent jobs daily? | |||||
Which AI coding agents complete multi-file tasks fastest without sacrificing correctness — benchmarks or real-world comparisons? | |||||
What agentic coding tools handle long-running tasks reliably — resuming after an interruption rather than starting over from scratch? | |||||
Setup & First Run0/5 cited (0%) | |||||
What are the best agentic IDEs for a team migrating from a traditional code editor that want AI-assisted multi-file editing from day one? | |||||
Which agentic CLI tools work out of the box on popular operating systems without requiring a container sandbox just to get started? | |||||
Which cloud coding agents can be connected to an existing private repo and start opening pull requests with minimal setup? | |||||
What's the easiest AI coding agent to get running locally on a large existing TypeScript monorepo without hours of configuration? | |||||
I'm evaluating autonomous coding agents for a 10-person startup — which ones can a new engineer get productive with in under an hour? | |||||
Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.
Track prompt changesVertical Ranking
| # | Brand | PresencePres. | Share of VoiceSoV | DocsDocs | BlogBlog | MentionsMent. | Avg PosPos | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Augment Code | 8.8% | 32.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.0% | #7.2 | +0.21 |
| 2 | Anthropic (Claude Code) | 3.2% | 12.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.2% | #3.9 | +0.35 |
| 3 | Block (Goose) | 3.2% | 12.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.2% | #4.9 | +0.54 |
| 4 | OpenAI (Codex CLI / Codex) | 3.2% | 10.9% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 2.4% | #7.7 | +0.25 |
| 5 | Factory (Droid) | 2.4% | 10.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.6% | #4.7 | +0.60 |
| 6 | Cursor (Anysphere) | 2.4% | 5.5% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 2.4% | #16.7 | +0.27 |
| 7 | Warp | 1.6% | 3.6% | 1.6% | 0.0% | 1.6% | #4.0 | +0.30 |
| 8 | All Hands AI (OpenHands) | 0.8% | 5.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% | #2.0 | +0.70 |
| 9 | OpenCode | 0.8% | 1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% | #2.0 | +0.60 |
| 10 | Cognition (Devin) | 0.8% | 1.8% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.8% | #3.0 | +0.80 |
| 11 | Aider AI | 0.8% | 1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% | #27.0 | +0.00 |
| 12 | Amp | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| 13 | Cline Bot Inc. | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| 14 | Lovable | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| 15 | Replit (Agent 3) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| 16 | Roo Code (Roomote) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| 17 | StackBlitz (Bolt.new) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
Turn this into your team dashboard
Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.