All Hands AI (OpenHands) logo

AI visibility report

AI visibility report for All Hands AI (OpenHands) in Autonomous Coding Agents.

Outside the top three on 13 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.

Augment Code is cited on 5 of those losses.

25 prompts
5 platforms
Updated Jun 30, 2026 - refreshed weekly
Track All Hands AI (OpenHands) daily

Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for All Hands AI (OpenHands).

Track All Hands AI (OpenHands) across these prompts daily.

Start free trial
1percent
Presence Rate
Low presence

Still absent from 99.2% of tracked prompt responses

Top-3 citations across 125 prompt × platform pairs

+0.70
Sentiment
-1.00.0+1.0
Very positive
No clearrank

Peer Ranking

#1#17
No clear rankin Autonomous Coding Agents

Key Metrics

Presence Rate0.8%
Share of Voice5.5%
Avg Position#2.0
Docs Presence0.0%
Blog Presence0.0%
Brand Mentions0.8%

Platform Breakdown

Gemini Search
4%1/25 prompts
ChatGPT
0%0/25 prompts
Bing Copilot
0%0/25 prompts
Perplexity
0%0/25 prompts
Google AI Mode
0%0/25 prompts

How to read this. All Hands AI (OpenHands) appears in 0.8% of tracked prompt responses. Presence is absolute coverage; share of voice is relative citation share; sentiment measures tone only when the brand appears.

Where All Hands AI (OpenHands) is losing

Prompts where competitors are visible and All Hands AI (OpenHands) is not.

These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.

Where All Hands AI (OpenHands) is winning1

  • What AI coding agents support bring-your-own LLM provider so a platform team can route through an existing enterprise model contract?

    Avg # 1.0 · 1 platform

Where All Hands AI (OpenHands) is losing5

  • Which AI coding agents handle context window limitations most gracefully when working across dozens of files in an enterprise codebase?

    Competitors on 3 platforms

    Track this prompt
  • What agentic coding tools handle long-running tasks reliably — resuming after an interruption rather than starting over from scratch?

    Competitors on 2 platforms

    Track this prompt
  • Which cloud coding agents integrate with CI pipelines to automatically attempt fixes when a build or test suite fails?

    Competitors on 1 platform

    Track this prompt
  • What autonomous coding agents run tasks inside a secure sandbox so a compromised prompt can't affect the host filesystem?

    Competitors on 1 platform

    Track this prompt
  • Which autonomous coding agents can reliably write and run tests, interpret failures, and self-correct without human intervention?

    Competitors on 1 platform

    Track this prompt

Track All Hands AI (OpenHands) daily before the next report refresh.

Track these gaps
Research dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ

Overview

All Hands AI is a Boston-based company founded in 2024 that develops OpenHands, an open-source, model-agnostic platform for autonomous cloud coding agents. Built by the core maintainers of the original open-source OpenHands (formerly OpenDevin) project, the platform enables engineering teams to delegate real software development work—bug fixes, dependency upgrades, test generation, refactoring, and vulnerability remediation—to AI agents that operate autonomously inside secure, sandboxed runtimes. OpenHands runs as a self-hosted solution, via a managed cloud, or in private VPC environments, and supports any large language model. With over 78,000 GitHub stars and 4 million downloads, it has become one of the most widely adopted open-source coding agent projects in the developer ecosystem, serving engineers at organizations including Apple, Google, Amazon, Netflix, and NVIDIA.

OpenHands is an open-source, enterprise-grade platform for deploying and orchestrating autonomous AI coding agents. It provides a web GUI (Agent Canvas), CLI, and Python SDK that let developers delegate engineering tasks—from GitHub issue resolution to large-scale codebase modernization—to agents that plan, write, run, and iterate on code inside isolated Docker or Kubernetes sandboxes. The platform is model-agnostic, supports MCP and ACP protocols for third-party agent interoperability, and can scale from a single developer running local agents to thousands of parallel cloud agents across enterprise engineering teams.

Key Facts

Founded
2024
HQ
Boston, MA, USA
Founders
Robert Brennan, Graham Neubig, Xingyao Wang
Funding
$23.8M
Status
Private

Target users

Platform and infrastructure engineering teams automating developer workflows at scaleEnterprise software teams managing large, legacy, or multi-repository codebasesOrganizations with strict data-security or compliance requirements needing self-hosted AIAgent engineers and developer-tooling builders using the OpenHands SDK to build custom agentic workflowsIndividual developers seeking an open-source, self-hostable alternative to proprietary coding agentsAcademic researchers benchmarking and advancing AI software engineering agents

Key Capabilities10

  • Autonomous end-to-end task execution: plans, codes, tests, debugs, and submits PRs without per-step human approval
  • Model-agnostic architecture supporting any LLM (cloud or local open-weight models)
  • Secure, sandboxed Docker/Kubernetes runtime with full auditability
  • Parallel multi-agent orchestration for large or multi-repo codebases
  • Agent Canvas: self-hosted developer control center with browser-based GUI, CLI, and SDK interfaces
  • Large Codebase SDK with dependency mapping for safe parallel agent execution
  • MCP support and ACP interoperability with third-party agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini)
  • Enterprise SAML/SSO, multi-user RBAC, audit trails, budget enforcement, and usage reporting
  • Micro-agent customization for organization- or repo-level context injection
  • Flexible deployment: local, SaaS cloud, self-hosted VPC, or air-gapped on-premises

Key Use Cases8

  • Automated vulnerability scanning and dependency upgrade PRs across multiple repositories
  • Autonomous bug triage and fix generation from GitHub issues or Jira tickets
  • Test coverage expansion: generating and maintaining unit and integration tests
  • Legacy codebase modernization (e.g., COBOL-to-Java migration with validation)
  • Automated code review summarization, feedback application, and test-fix cycles
  • Documentation and release-note generation directly from commits and PRs
  • Incident triage: log analysis, root-cause identification, and fix PR generation
  • Large-scale refactoring and tech-debt reduction across monoliths or multi-repo systems

All Hands AI (OpenHands) customer outcomes

Flextract

87% of bug tickets fixed same-day

OpenHands autonomously resolves bug tickets same-day without manual engineering intervention, giving clients the impression of a significantly expanded engineering team.

C3.ai

C3.ai uses OpenHands as the only solution that enables remote, at-scale autonomous coding agent deployment beyond laptop or narrow CI templates.

Recent Trend

VisibilityNo trend yet
Avg positionNo trend yet
SentimentNo trend yet

How AI describes All Hands AI (OpenHands)

No concise AI response excerpt is available for this brand yet.

Alternatives in Autonomous Coding Agents6

OpenHands positions itself as the open, model-agnostic standard for enterprise-grade autonomous coding agents—contrasting with proprietary, IDE-bound, or single-LLM-locked alternatives.

  • Its core differentiators are MIT-licensed open-source transparency, flexible deployment (local, cloud, self-hosted VPC, or air-gapped), sandboxed runtime security, and the ability to scale from one to thousands of parallel agents across large or legacy codebases.
  • It explicitly targets teams who need agentic automation beyond in-editor autocomplete, framing itself against pair-programming tools (Cursor, GitHub Copilot) and closed SaaS agents (Devin) alike.
View category comparison hub

Reviews

Praised

  • Open-source transparency and MIT license
  • Model-agnostic flexibility (any LLM, including local open-weight models)
  • Self-hostable with full data control
  • High-quality SDK for agentic workflow development
  • Seamless GitHub integration and autonomous PR generation
  • Active and large open-source community (78k+ GitHub stars)
  • Effective for repetitive backend and toil-heavy engineering tasks
  • Planning Mode improves task validation before execution

Criticized

  • Significant infrastructure overhead for self-hosted team deployments
  • Setup complexity (Docker, API keys, compute) vs. managed alternatives
  • Output quality degrades with vague or poorly scoped task descriptions
  • Limited native IDE plugin support (VS Code, IntelliJ) relative to IDE-first tools
  • Free Individual SaaS tier capped at 10 daily conversations

Community sentiment is strongly positive, particularly among developers who value open-source transparency, model flexibility, and the ability to self-host. Users praise the SDK quality, GitHub integration, and autonomous task completion for backend and repetitive engineering work. Common criticism centers on infrastructure setup burden for self-hosted deployments and inconsistent output quality when tasks are underspecified. No verified scores from formal review platforms (G2, Gartner Peer Insights, TrustRadius) were found at the time of research.

Pricing

OpenHands offers three tiers. Open Source (free, MIT-licensed): full local deployment via Docker with web GUI, CLI, and SDK; BYOK required; unlimited daily conversations; community support only. Individual SaaS (free): hosted cloud access from desktop and mobile; BYOK or at-cost pay-as-you-go model usage with no markup; GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket, Jira, and Slack integrations; limited to 1 user and 10 daily conversations. Enterprise (custom pricing): SaaS or self-hosted in customer VPC; unlimited concurrent conversations and users; Large Codebase SDK; SAML/SSO; multi-user RBAC; centralized billing; budget enforcement; usage reporting; priority support with a named Customer Engineer and shared Slack channel.

Limitations

  • Self-hosting at team scale requires Docker/Kubernetes management, compute provisioning, and API key administration, adding operational overhead versus fully managed SaaS alternatives.
  • Task quality degrades significantly with vague or poorly scoped inputs; clear, specific issues yield the best results.
  • SWE-bench is the primary public benchmark, but the team itself acknowledges it is increasingly gamed, introducing uncertainty in cross-tool comparisons.
  • Native IDE integration (VS Code, IntelliJ plugins) is still limited; the platform is primarily browser- or CLI-based.
  • The free Individual SaaS tier caps daily conversations at 10 and is limited to a single user.

Frequently asked questions

Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic

Topic Coverage

Capability0/5DevEx0/5Integrations &Ecosystem1/5Performance &Reliability0/5Setup & First Run0/5

Prompt-Level Results

Brand citedCompetitor citedNot cited
PromptGemini SearchChatGPTBing CopilotPerplexityGoogle AI Mode
Capability0/5 cited (0%)

What AI coding agents handle multi-repo tasks well — making coordinated changes across a frontend and backend repo in a single session?

Which autonomous coding agents can reliably write and run tests, interpret failures, and self-correct without human intervention?

I'm looking for an agentic CLI that supports tool use like web search and shell execution during a coding task — what are my options?

What autonomous coding tools handle legacy codebases in dynamically typed languages best — Python 2 or older PHP specifically?

Which cloud coding agents are best for generating and merging pull requests asynchronously without a developer staying in the loop?

Developer Experience0/5 cited (0%)

Which autonomous coding agents give the best real-time feedback loop when running multi-step tasks so developers stay in control?

Which agentic IDEs have the smoothest experience for reviewing and approving AI-generated changes before they touch the main branch?

What AI coding agents do senior engineers prefer for refactoring large codebases without babysitting every intermediate step?

Which AI coding agents handle context window limitations most gracefully when working across dozens of files in an enterprise codebase?

What autonomous coding tools are best suited for a solo developer who wants to delegate routine feature work and focus on architecture?

Integrations & Ecosystem1/5 cited (20%)

Which cloud coding agents integrate with CI pipelines to automatically attempt fixes when a build or test suite fails?

Which autonomous coding agents integrate natively with popular code editors so devs can trigger agent tasks without leaving their IDE?

What AI coding agents support bring-your-own LLM provider so a platform team can route through an existing enterprise model contract?

Which agentic coding platforms integrate with project management tools so engineers can assign tickets directly to an AI agent to action?

What autonomous coding tools have the best ecosystem of community plugins for extending agent capabilities with custom tools and workflows?

Performance & Reliability0/5 cited (0%)

What autonomous coding agents run tasks inside a secure sandbox so a compromised prompt can't affect the host filesystem?

Which autonomous coding agents are most cost-efficient for high-volume use — minimising frontier LLM provider token spend per merged PR?

Which cloud coding agents have the best uptime and task success rates for a mid-size team running dozens of concurrent agent jobs daily?

Which AI coding agents complete multi-file tasks fastest without sacrificing correctness — benchmarks or real-world comparisons?

What agentic coding tools handle long-running tasks reliably — resuming after an interruption rather than starting over from scratch?

Setup & First Run0/5 cited (0%)

What are the best agentic IDEs for a team migrating from a traditional code editor that want AI-assisted multi-file editing from day one?

Which agentic CLI tools work out of the box on popular operating systems without requiring a container sandbox just to get started?

Which cloud coding agents can be connected to an existing private repo and start opening pull requests with minimal setup?

What's the easiest AI coding agent to get running locally on a large existing TypeScript monorepo without hours of configuration?

I'm evaluating autonomous coding agents for a 10-person startup — which ones can a new engineer get productive with in under an hour?

Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.

Track prompt changes

Vertical Ranking

#BrandPres.SoVDocsBlogMent.PosSentiment
1Augment Code8.8%32.7%0.0%0.0%8.0%#7.2+0.21
2Anthropic (Claude Code)3.2%12.7%0.0%0.0%3.2%#3.9+0.35
3Block (Goose)3.2%12.7%0.0%0.0%3.2%#4.9+0.54
4OpenAI (Codex CLI / Codex)3.2%10.9%0.8%0.0%2.4%#7.7+0.25
5Factory (Droid)2.4%10.9%0.0%0.0%1.6%#4.7+0.60
6Cursor (Anysphere)2.4%5.5%0.8%0.8%2.4%#16.7+0.27
7Warp1.6%3.6%1.6%0.0%1.6%#4.0+0.30
8All Hands AI (OpenHands)0.8%5.5%0.0%0.0%0.8%#2.0+0.70
9OpenCode0.8%1.8%0.0%0.0%0.8%#2.0+0.60
10Cognition (Devin)0.8%1.8%0.8%0.0%0.8%#3.0+0.80
11Aider AI0.8%1.8%0.0%0.0%0.8%#27.0+0.00
12Amp0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
13Cline Bot Inc.0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
14Lovable0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
15Replit (Agent 3)0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
16Roo Code (Roomote)0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
17StackBlitz (Bolt.new)0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%

Turn this into your team dashboard

Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.

Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.

Get started free