AI visibility report
AI visibility report for Wasmer in Open Source Commercial / OSS Infrastructure.
Outside the top three on 8 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.
Deno is cited on 4 of those losses.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for Wasmer.
Track Wasmer across these prompts daily.
Start free trialStill absent from 99.3% of tracked prompt responses
Top-3 citations across 150 prompt × platform pairs
Peer Ranking
Key Metrics
Platform Breakdown
Gemini Search
Perplexity
ChatGPT
Bing Copilot
Google AI Mode
GrokHow to read this. Wasmer appears in 0.7% of tracked prompt responses. Presence is absolute coverage; share of voice is relative citation share; sentiment measures tone only when the brand appears.
Where Wasmer is losing
Prompts where competitors are visible and Wasmer is not.
These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.
Where Wasmer is winning1
Which WASM-based serverless platforms have the best cold start performance compared to container-based functions — is the latency improvement meaningful for production?
Avg # 3.0 · 1 platform
Where Wasmer is losing5
What durable workflow platforms have the best debugging experience for failed mid-execution jobs — which ones surface errors clearly and support smart retries?
Competitors on 2 platforms
Track this promptWhich alternative JavaScript runtimes have the most mature ecosystems — which ones have production-ready database drivers, ORMs, and observability libraries?
Competitors on 2 platforms
Track this promptI'm evaluating web-based desktop app frameworks versus native UI toolkits — which ones get closest to native performance and OS integration?
Competitors on 2 platforms
Track this promptWhat are the best JavaScript runtimes for migrating an existing Node.js app — which ones have the fewest compatibility gotchas on day one?
Competitors on 1 platform
Track this promptI'm evaluating durable workflow and background job orchestration platforms — which ones require the least infrastructure to get your first workflow running?
Competitors on 1 platform
Track this prompt
Track Wasmer daily before the next report refresh.
Track these gapsResearch dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ
Overview
Wasmer is an open-source WebAssembly (Wasm) runtime company founded in 2018 and headquartered in San Francisco, backed by Y Combinator. Written in Rust, the Wasmer runtime enables fast, secure, sandboxed execution of WebAssembly modules across servers, browsers, mobile devices, IoT, and edge environments. It supports multiple compiler backends (Cranelift, LLVM, Singlepass) and introduces WASIX, a POSIX extension layer allowing legacy applications to run in Wasm without code rewrites. The company's commercial platform comprises three products: the Runtime (embeddable across Rust, Python, JavaScript, Go, Ruby, and C), the Registry (a WebAssembly package manager), and Wasmer Edge (a serverless edge cloud with sub-millisecond cold starts). Wasmer has over 20,000 GitHub stars and more than 20,000 community users.
Wasmer provides a three-product WebAssembly platform: (1) the Wasmer Runtime—an open-source, Rust-written Wasm execution engine supporting Cranelift, LLVM, and Singlepass compiler backends with WASI, WCGI, and Emscripten runners and SDKs for six languages; (2) the Wasmer Registry—a WebAssembly package manager enabling publishing, sharing, and running Wasm packages via CLI; and (3) Wasmer Edge—a serverless edge cloud with global CDN, sub-millisecond cold starts, automatic scaling, and support for HTTP, TCP, and UDP workloads. The runtime's WASIX extension provides POSIX compatibility, enabling unmodified legacy applications (PHP, Python, PostgreSQL, Bash) to run sandboxed in WebAssembly.
Key Facts
- Founded
- 2018
- HQ
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Founders
- Syrus Akbary
- Employees
- 6-15
- Funding
- ~$150K reported (likely incomplete)
- Customers
- 20,000+ community users
- Status
- Private (YC-backed)
Target users
Key Capabilities10
- Multi-compiler Wasm runtime: Cranelift, LLVM, and Singlepass backends with AOT and JIT support
- WASIX: POSIX extensions for WebAssembly enabling fork, threads, sockets, and legacy app compatibility
- Cross-platform support: Linux, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, RISC-V, and browser (only major runtime to officially support iOS)
- Multi-language SDKs: Rust, Python, JavaScript, Go, Ruby, C, and PHP
- Wasmer Edge: serverless edge deployment with sub-millisecond (<1ms) cold starts and global CDN
- Wasmer Registry: WebAssembly package manager with CLI publish/run workflow
- Instruction metering for deterministic execution limits and resource control
- Dynamic linking in WASIX (v7.0), enabling broader Python and native library support
- Headless execution mode for minimal-footprint deployments
- Experimental Async API for full async/await support across compiler backends
Key Use Cases8
- Serverless and edge application deployment with near-zero cold starts
- Running legacy POSIX applications (Bash, curl, PostgreSQL) sandboxed in WebAssembly via WASIX
- Secure plugin and extension systems embedded in host applications
- WordPress, PHP, Python/Django, and static site hosting on Wasm infrastructure
- Cross-platform application distribution without recompilation
- IoT and embedded systems compute workloads
- Browser-side execution of compute-intensive applications offline
- AI agent and edge AI workload sandboxing
Recent Trend
How AI describes Wasmer3
Speed Advantage: WASM runtimes (Wasmtime, Wasmer) start faster than `containerd` because they don't need to boot a full OS or isolate a large runtime environment.
What are the best JavaScript runtimes for migrating an existing Node.js app — which ones have the fewest compatibility gotchas on day one?
WebAssembly Runtime Performance: Wasmtime vs Wasmer vs WAMR | Bedda Blog | Bedda.tech | | Compilation latency | JIT/AOT trade-offs affect cold-start and throughput | Serverless platforms instantiating thousands of modules naveenbirru.comnaveenbirru.com.
What are the real limitations of WebAssembly runtimes for server workloads — which types of applications are not a good fit for WASM-based deployment?
Wasmer Edge (and Wasmer runtime) * Runtime Model: `Wasmer` native architecture using features like _Instaboot_ . * Cold Start Performance: 1 to 10 milliseconds . www.morphllm.com * How it works: Wasmer completel...
Which WASM-based serverless platforms have the best cold start performance compared to container-based functions — is the latency improvement meaningful for production?
Most cited sources1
Alternatives in Open Source Commercial / OSS Infrastructure6
Wasmer positions itself as the 'Docker/Linux of WebAssembly'—prioritizing pragmatic usability, full-stack deployment, and maximum platform breadth over strict standards adherence.
- Its WASIX extension bridges the POSIX gap (fork, threads, sockets) to run legacy applications like Bash, curl, and PostgreSQL in Wasm immediately, at the cost of being non-standard.
- This contrasts with Wasmtime (Bytecode Alliance), which is uncompromising on WASI standards and the Component Model, and Fermyon Technologies (Spin), which targets cloud-native microservices with strong Wasm standards compliance.
- Wasmer differentiates further via its integrated three-product stack (Runtime + Registry + Edge), iOS/Android runtime support (the only major general-purpose Wasm runtime to officially support iOS via V8 JIT-less mode), multi-language SDKs, and a sub-millisecond cold-start edge network positioning cost-competitively against Cloudflare Workers and AWS Lambda.
Reviews
Praised
- Docker-like CLI usability ('wasmer run' feels intuitive)
- Broad language SDK support (Rust, Python, JS, Go, Ruby, C)
- WASIX enabling legacy apps without code rewrites
- iOS and cross-platform runtime support
- Largest Wasm ecosystem with package manager
- Sub-millisecond cold starts on Wasmer Edge
- Active development pace with frequent major releases
Criticized
- WASIX non-standard extensions causing runtime lock-in
- Wasmtime leads on WASI Preview 2 / Component Model compliance
- Wasmtime holds steady-state JIT execution performance edge
- Debugging Wasm modules remains difficult with immature tooling
- Small team may limit enterprise support bandwidth
- Memory consumption can grow in precompiled modes versus Wasmtime
Developer sentiment toward Wasmer is broadly positive within the WebAssembly community, particularly praising its ease of use, broad language SDK support, Docker-like CLI experience, and the pragmatic WASIX approach for running existing applications. Technical analyses note Wasmer performs comparably to Wasmtime in Cranelift-backend benchmarks, excelling with smaller datasets, and uniquely offers iOS runtime support. Criticisms center on WASIX non-standardness creating runtime lock-in, Wasmtime's edge in WASI standards compliance and steady-state JIT performance, and the general immaturity of Wasm debugging tooling across all runtimes. No formal software review platform (G2, Gartner) profiles were found.
Pricing
Hobby tier is free forever and includes 1 member seat, 3 apps, 100K requests/month, 150 GB bandwidth, 100 compute hours, and community support. Pro tier is $10/month and adds team collaboration, 10 apps, 1M requests/month, 1 TB bandwidth, 500 compute hours, SSH/SFTP access, and email/chat support (with usage-based overages at $0.20/million extra requests, $0.10/GB extra bandwidth, $0.05/active CPU hour, $0.01/GB-hour provisioned memory). Enterprise and Subhosting tiers are custom-priced and include unlimited users, private dedicated locations, subhosting capabilities, 99.95% SLA, compliance support, and advanced support.
Limitations
- WASIX POSIX extensions are non-standard and not interoperable with Wasmtime or other runtimes that follow the WASI Preview 2 / Component Model specification, creating potential vendor lock-in.
- Wasmtime generally leads benchmarks for steady-state JIT/AOT execution performance and WASI standards compliance.
- The Wasm Component Model support in Wasmer is still catching up to Wasmtime as of 2026.
- Debugging WebAssembly modules remains challenging across all runtimes, including Wasmer, with tooling still maturing.
- The company's small team (~6–9 employees as of 2024) may constrain enterprise support capacity and feature velocity.
- Memory consumption in precompiled modes can grow compared to Wasmtime and WAMR for certain workloads.
Frequently asked questions
Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic
Topic Coverage
Prompt-Level Results
| Prompt | Perplexity | ChatGPT | Bing Copilot | Gemini Search | Google AI Mode | Grok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capability0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
What are the real limitations of WebAssembly runtimes for server workloads — which types of applications are not a good fit for WASM-based deployment? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which durable workflow platforms handle fan-out patterns well — which ones can spawn thousands of parallel child workflows and aggregate results without hitting limits? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which alternative JavaScript runtimes offer the best file system and native API access compared to Node.js — where do the gaps matter most for real apps? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which lightweight SSR web frameworks can handle complex auth flows, middleware chains, and database access without handing off to a separate backend? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
I'm evaluating web-based desktop app frameworks versus native UI toolkits — which ones get closest to native performance and OS integration? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Developer Experience0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
What are the best edge-first web frameworks compared to traditional SSR frameworks — how do they differ on routing, data loading, and deployment experience? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which schema validation libraries work well across both frontend forms and backend API validation — which ones let you share schemas without duplication? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What durable workflow platforms have the best debugging experience for failed mid-execution jobs — which ones surface errors clearly and support smart retries? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which alternative JavaScript runtimes have the best npm ecosystem compatibility — which ones let you use existing packages without frequent incompatibilities? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which lightweight edge server-side frameworks have the fastest hot-reload and local iteration cycle — is the feedback loop noticeably better than traditional Node.js? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Integrations & Ecosystem0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
Which modern OSS web frameworks support the most deployment targets — edge runtimes, containers, and serverless functions without major code changes? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which type-safe API frameworks integrate best with popular frontend data-fetching libraries — which ones give you full end-to-end type safety without extra code generation? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What tools help evaluate the long-term sustainability of OSS infrastructure projects — how do you assess risk when the commercial company behind one pivots or gets acquired? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which durable workflow platforms integrate best with event-driven architectures — which ones let you trigger workflows from message queues and publish results back to a stream? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which alternative JavaScript runtimes have the most mature ecosystems — which ones have production-ready database drivers, ORMs, and observability libraries? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Performance & Reliability1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
Which WASM-based serverless platforms have the best cold start performance compared to container-based functions — is the latency improvement meaningful for production? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which durable workflow platforms perform best under high throughput — which ones scale past the bottlenecks when you need thousands of workflow executions per second? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What commercial OSS infrastructure projects offer the best enterprise support model — which ones have reliable SLAs when the open-source community can't respond fast enough? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which lightweight JS runtimes have the best memory efficiency compared to Node.js — does the difference matter enough for cost optimization in containerized deployments? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which modern alternative JavaScript runtimes are actually faster than Node.js for HTTP server workloads — what do realistic benchmarks show? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Setup & First Run0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
What are the best JavaScript runtimes for migrating an existing Node.js app — which ones have the fewest compatibility gotchas on day one? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
I'm evaluating durable workflow and background job orchestration platforms — which ones require the least infrastructure to get your first workflow running? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which frameworks let you package a web app as a native desktop app using web technologies — how do they handle Windows and Linux build differences? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What are the best type-safe end-to-end API frameworks for TypeScript — which ones give you autocomplete and validation across the stack with minimal boilerplate? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What WASM runtimes support deploying serverless functions in production — which platforms cover the full path from writing a function to running it at the edge? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.
Track prompt changesVertical Ranking
| # | Brand | PresencePres. | Share of VoiceSoV | DocsDocs | BlogBlog | MentionsMent. | Avg PosPos | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deno | 2.7% | 29.6% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | #2.8 | +0.67 |
| 2 | Bun | 2.0% | 18.5% | 2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | #1.4 | +0.77 |
| 3 | Temporal | 2.0% | 18.5% | 0.7% | 1.3% | 15.3% | #2.4 | +0.57 |
| 4 | Remix | 0.7% | 3.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.7% | #2.0 | +0.45 |
| 5 | Inngest | 0.7% | 7.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.3% | #2.5 | +0.60 |
| 6 | tRPC | 0.7% | 3.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.0% | #3.0 | +0.35 |
| 7 | Tauri | 0.7% | 7.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.7% | #3.5 | +0.60 |
| 8 | Wasmer | 0.7% | 11.1% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 5.3% | #5.0 | +0.60 |
| 9 | Astro | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| 10 | Fermyon | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| 11 | Hono | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 14.0% | — | — |
| 12 | Zod | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.7% | — | — |
Turn this into your team dashboard
Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.