AI visibility report
Ably ranks #4 in Messaging & Event Streaming AI search.
Outside the top three on 19 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.
Confluent is cited on 15 of those losses.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for Ably.
Track Ably across these prompts daily.
Start free trial#4 among 9 vendors · still absent from 89.3% of tracked prompt responses
Top-3 citations across 150 prompt × platform pairs
Peer Ranking
Key Metrics
Platform Breakdown
Grok
Perplexity
Google AI Mode
ChatGPT
Gemini Search
Bing CopilotVisible, but narrative can improve. Ably ranks #4 on presence but #7 on sentiment. The brand appears relatively often, but competitors may be getting more favorable language when they appear.
Where Ably is losing
Prompts where competitors are visible and Ably is not.
These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.
Where Ably is winning3
Which messaging platforms support WebSocket or SSE fan-out for pushing events directly to browser clients at scale?
Avg # 1.0 · 3 platforms
Which event streaming platforms offer the best event replay and long-term retention compared to traditional message queues?
Avg # 1.0 · 1 platform
What managed message queue services offer the strongest SLAs and best architectural guidance for failure modes?
Avg # 2.0 · 1 platform
Where Ably is losing5
What cloud-native event streaming platforms handle geo-replication and multi-region active-active setups best?
Competitors on 5 platforms
Track this promptAre there event streaming platforms with schema registry support built in, rather than requiring a separate add-on?
Competitors on 5 platforms
Track this promptWhich managed pub/sub services have built-in connectors for relational database CDC or document database change streams?
Competitors on 4 platforms
Track this promptWhich managed event streaming services are benchmarked for throughput and latency at 500k messages per second?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhich event streaming platforms have the best local development experience and CLI tooling for day-to-day work?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this prompt
Track Ably daily before the next report refresh.
Track these gapsResearch dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ
Overview
Ably is a London-based realtime experience platform founded in 2016 by Matthew O'Riordan and Paddy Byers. It provides a suite of developer APIs and SDKs enabling organizations to embed realtime capabilities—pub/sub messaging, live chat, collaborative features, database sync, and AI agent transport—into their products without building or operating custom WebSocket infrastructure. Ably's globally distributed edge network spans 700+ points of presence across 11 regions, delivering a stated 6.5ms average message latency and 100% uptime over six-plus years. The platform serves over 2 billion devices per month across 80 countries, processing 2 trillion API operations monthly. Customers include HubSpot, NASCAR, Bloomberg, Verizon, and Mentimeter. Ably has raised $78 million in funding, with its Series B led by Insight Partners and Dawn Capital.
Ably is a realtime experience platform offering a composable suite of products built on a globally distributed WebSocket edge network. Its core offerings include Pub/Sub (flexible channel-based messaging with guaranteed delivery), Chat (purpose-built chat APIs with typing, presence, reactions, and push notifications), AI Transport (durable realtime sessions for AI agents), LiveObjects (synchronized shared state), Spaces (multiplayer collaboration primitives), and LiveSync (database-to-client change propagation). All products share a unified infrastructure with SOC 2, HIPAA, and ISO 27001 compliance, 22+ language SDKs, and 19+ managed integrations.
Key Facts
- Founded
- 2016
- HQ
- London, United Kingdom
- Founders
- Matthew O'Riordan, Paddy Byers
- Employees
- 100-200
- Funding
- $78M
- Customers
- 500+
- Status
- Private
Target users
Key Capabilities10
- Pub/Sub messaging with guaranteed ordering, exactly-once delivery, and message persistence
- Global WebSocket edge network: 700+ PoPs, 11 regions, 6.5ms average message delivery latency
- Durable sessions and automatic connection state recovery for apps and AI agents
- Realtime chat APIs and SDKs (Ably Chat) with typing indicators, presence, reactions, and push notifications
- AI Transport layer for stateful, continuous agentic AI sessions
- LiveObjects: realtime synchronized application state across users and devices
- Spaces: multiplayer collaboration primitives (live cursors, presence, member location, component locking)
- LiveSync: database-to-frontend change propagation supporting PostgreSQL and MongoDB
- Multi-protocol support: WebSockets, MQTT, SSE, HTTP streaming, REST
- Enterprise security and compliance: SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA BAA, ISO 27001, GDPR, 99.999% uptime SLA
Key Use Cases8
- Live chat and customer support messaging (e.g., HubSpot, Sportsbet)
- Fan engagement and sports data broadcast (e.g., NASCAR, Tennis Australia, Genius Sports)
- Multiplayer collaboration and co-editing (e.g., Mentimeter, TeamRetro, Webflow)
- Realtime dashboards and live data visualization (e.g., Experity, Urbantz)
- AI agent and copilot transport layer for stateful agentic sessions
- Telemedicine and HIPAA-compliant healthcare realtime infrastructure (e.g., Doxy.me)
- Live streaming platform interaction and social features (e.g., 17LIVE)
- Feature flag and configuration delivery in under a second (e.g., Split)
Ably customer outcomes
65% reduction in realtime infrastructure costs; 95% fewer patient queue issues; 99% drop in app crashes; full ROI in und
Rebuilt realtime infrastructure in under six months with zero downtime, eliminating ghost notifications, message sequencing errors, and outages that had previously disrupted virtual care delivery for over 250,000 daily calls.
30% faster cross-user sync; zero outages since migration
Migrated from Pusher to Ably in one week of core development with zero service disruptions, achieving faster sync and building a new planning poker application with LiveObjects in days rather than weeks.
100+ deploys implemented daily by autonomous teams
Powers live chat across 268,000+ companies and their customers in 120 countries using Ably's complete realtime platform as a business-critical infrastructure layer.
Recent Trend
How AI describes Ably3
Ably: A highly scalable Pub/Sub platform built specifically for this. It natively supports WebSockets and fallback mechanisms like SSE . It can scale to millions of concurrent browser connections, guaranteeing message ordering and delivery.
Which messaging platforms support WebSocket or SSE fan-out for pushing events directly to browser clients at scale?
Ably Realtime : Specialized in extreme scale realtime pub/sub, offering built-in support for both WebSockets and SSE.
Which event streaming platforms offer the best event replay and long-term retention compared to traditional message queues?
https://ably.com/blog/a-look-at-8-top-stream-processing-platforms 
8The best pub/sub services: 5 pub/sub solutions compared - Ably
ably.com·Faq
- 7
WebSockets vs Server-Sent Events: Key differences and ...
ably.com·Faq
- 5
A look at 8 top stream processing platforms
ably.com·Blog Post
- 5
Server-Sent Events: A WebSockets alternative ready for ...
ably.com·Faq
- 3
Achieving exactly-once delivery with Ably
ably.com·Blog Post
- 3
What is Event Streaming? A Deep Dive
ably.com·Landing Page
Alternatives in Messaging & Event Streaming6
Ably positions itself as the 'definitive realtime experience platform of the internet,' differentiating on four publicly stated pillars of dependability: performance (6.5ms global message delivery latency), reliability (100% uptime across 6+ years, 99.999999% message survivability), scale (2B+ connected devices/month, 2T+ API operations/month), and a truly distributed global edge network (700+ PoPs, 11 regions).
- Unlike backend-centric Kafka platforms (Confluent, Redpanda, WarpStream) focused on durable log streaming between services, Ably targets last-mile WebSocket delivery to end-user devices for consumer-facing applications.
- Against PubNub, its closest peer, Ably competes on transparent engineering guarantees, a composable multi-product suite (Pub/Sub, Chat, AI Transport, Spaces, LiveObjects, LiveSync), and a usage-based pricing model with volume discounts.
- Its 2025 AI Transport product extends its positioning into agentic AI infrastructure, targeting durable stateful sessions for AI agents.
Reviews
Praised
- Ease of integration and developer-friendly APIs
- Reliable uptime and consistent performance at scale
- Responsive and proactive customer support
- Comprehensive and clear documentation
- Multi-language and multi-platform SDK breadth
- Fast message delivery with low latency
- Collaborative vendor relationship and product alignment
Criticized
- Pricing model complexity and cost unpredictability at scale
- Limited community channels for public Q&A
- Enterprise monitoring/dashboard requires Datadog integration on higher tiers
- Additional cost for message history queries
- Some features listed as 'coming soon' on roadmap
- May not support some legacy protocols or systems
Ably holds a 4.8/5 rating on G2 (67 reviews) with Spring 2025 badges for Best Support, Best Meets Requirements, Easiest to Use, and Users Most Likely to Recommend. On Gartner Peer Insights it holds a 4.2/5 rating (9 reviews in Event Brokers). Users consistently praise ease of integration, platform reliability, responsive and proactive customer support, and comprehensive documentation. Criticisms center on pricing complexity and unpredictability at scale, limited community forums for public peer Q&A, and gaps in enterprise monitoring tooling on lower tiers.
Pricing
Ably offers two billing models: pay-per-minute (consumption-based) and pay-per-MAU. Consumption rates: messages at $2.50/million (as low as $0.50/M with volume discounts), connection minutes at $1.00/million (as low as $0.20/M), channel minutes at $1.00/million. Four tiers: Free ($0/month — 200 concurrent connections, 6M messages/month, 500 msg/sec); Standard ($29/month + usage — 10K connections, 10K channels, 2.5K msg/sec, 1-day email SLA); Pro ($399/month + usage — 50K connections, 50K channels, 10K msg/sec, Datadog lite, 4-hour email SLA); Enterprise (custom — unlimited capacity, 99.999% uptime SLA, 24×7 support, dedicated cluster, HIPAA BAA, SSO/SCIM, CNAME, committed-use discounts). Data transfer charged at $0.25/GiB across paid tiers. No credit card required for the free tier.
Limitations
- Pricing complexity noted by some reviewers; consumption-based model can be difficult to predict at scale.
- Enterprise dashboard for monitoring and troubleshooting is limited on lower tiers (Datadog integration only on Pro/Enterprise).
- Message history queries incur additional cost.
- Some reviewers note a lack of community channels for public questions.
- Message size capped at 64KiB on Free/Standard and 256KiB on Pro (custom on Enterprise).
- MySQL database support for LiveSync, thread replies for Chat, and several Spaces collaboration features (app state sync, rich text editing) are listed as 'coming soon' as of 2025.
- May not be compatible with some legacy systems or protocols per Gartner reviewers.
Frequently asked questions
Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic
Topic Coverage
Prompt-Level Results
| Prompt | Perplexity | Google AI Mode | ChatGPT | Gemini Search | Bing Copilot | Grok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capability4/5 cited (80%) | ||||||
Which messaging platforms support WebSocket or SSE fan-out for pushing events directly to browser clients at scale? | Your brand was cited | A competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which event streaming platforms offer the best event replay and long-term retention compared to traditional message queues? | A competitor was cited | Your brand was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What cloud-native event streaming platforms handle geo-replication and multi-region active-active setups best? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which event streaming platforms support exactly-once delivery for use cases where duplicate processing is unacceptable? | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which event streaming platforms support both real-time pub/sub and durable log-based consumption from the same topic? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Developer Experience1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
Which event streaming platforms make it easiest to debug message ordering and duplicate delivery issues in production? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What message queue and event streaming tools have the best developer experience for reducing day-to-day production pain points? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which event streaming platforms have the best local development experience and CLI tooling for day-to-day work? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What messaging platforms have the best built-in tooling for managing dead-letter queues and event replay without manual overhead? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Are there event streaming platforms with schema registry support built in, rather than requiring a separate add-on? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Integrations & Ecosystem1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
Which managed pub/sub services have built-in connectors for relational database CDC or document database change streams? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What tools work best for connecting an event streaming platform to a data warehouse for real-time analytics pipelines? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What open-standard or portable event streaming platforms help avoid vendor lock-in when building an event-driven architecture? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which event streaming platforms have IaC providers and container orchestration operators for infrastructure-as-code deployments? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which event streaming platforms integrate best with stream processing frameworks like Flink or Spark? | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Performance & Reliability3/5 cited (60%) | ||||||
What managed message queue services offer the strongest SLAs and best architectural guidance for failure modes? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Which managed event streaming services are benchmarked for throughput and latency at 500k messages per second? | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Which event streaming platforms handle backpressure best when consumers fall behind producers at high scale? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
What load testing tools and strategies work best for validating that an event streaming pipeline handles a 10x traffic spike? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
What are the best managed event streaming services for teams processing 10M+ events per day who want to avoid self-hosting overhead? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
Setup & First Run3/5 cited (60%) | ||||||
Which event streaming platforms have the best setup guides for consumer groups and topic partitioning for a team just getting started? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
We're a startup that just needs reliable async task queues — what are the simplest managed messaging services to start with? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand was cited |
Which pub/sub platforms are best suited for multi-tenant SaaS apps when configuring from day one? | Your brand was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What event streaming platforms make it easiest to migrate from a queue-based architecture without downtime? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited |
What's the quickest message broker to spin up locally for development without heavy container orchestration overhead? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited |
Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.
Track prompt changesVertical Ranking
| # | Brand | PresencePres. | Share of VoiceSoV | DocsDocs | BlogBlog | MentionsMent. | Avg PosPos | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confluent | 30.7% | 33.1% | 10.0% | 14.7% | 64.7% | #24.4 | +0.31 |
| 2 | Redpanda | 26.0% | 29.2% | 12.0% | 12.0% | 50.0% | #19.8 | +0.23 |
| 3 | StreamNative | 18.0% | 13.1% | 0.7% | 16.0% | 20.7% | #19.6 | +0.33 |
| 4 | Ably | 10.7% | 9.4% | 0.7% | 6.0% | 7.3% | #20.0 | +0.29 |
| 5 | NATS | 8.0% | 8.6% | 7.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | #30.6 | +0.46 |
| 6 | RabbitMQ | 4.0% | 2.5% | 2.0% | 0.7% | 0.0% | #44.8 | +0.64 |
| 7 | WarpStream | 3.3% | 1.4% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 4.7% | #35.6 | +0.08 |
| 8 | PubNub | 1.3% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 3.3% | #39.1 | +0.80 |
| 9 | Upstash | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 3.3% | #2.7 | +0.40 |
Turn this into your team dashboard
Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.