AI visibility report
AI visibility report for Paseo in Coding Agent Orchestration.
Outside the top three on 4 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.
Nimbalyst is cited on 2 of those losses.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for Paseo.
Track Paseo across these prompts daily.
Start free trialStill absent from 100% of tracked prompt responses
Top-3 citations across 125 prompt × platform pairs
Peer Ranking
Key Metrics
Platform Breakdown
Gemini Search
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AI Mode
Bing CopilotHow to read this. Paseo appears in 0% of tracked prompt responses. Presence is absolute coverage; share of voice is relative citation share; sentiment measures tone only when the brand appears.
Where Paseo is losing
Prompts where competitors are visible and Paseo is not.
These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.
Where Paseo is winning
No clear strengths identified yet.
Where Paseo is losing4
What coding agent orchestration platforms let a tech lead spin up isolated worktree environments per feature branch with minimal config on day one?
Competitors on 1 platform
Track this promptWhich tools for orchestrating parallel coding agents have the best voice control or natural-language task dispatch experience for individual developers?
Competitors on 1 platform
Track this promptWhich coding agent orchestration tools have the best UX for reviewing and merging parallel agent-generated changes without context-switching overload?
Competitors on 1 platform
Track this promptWhich coding agent orchestration tools are easiest to set up for a solo developer who already uses a third-party CLI coding agent and wants to run multiple tasks in parallel?
Competitors on 1 platform
Track this prompt
Track Paseo daily before the next report refresh.
Track these gapsResearch dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ
Overview
Paseo is a free, open source, self-hosted coding agent orchestration platform built by indie developer Mo Boudra. It runs a local daemon that launches and supervises 39+ native coding agent CLIs—including Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode, Pi, Cursor, and Gemini CLI—and exposes them through native iOS, Android, desktop, web, and CLI clients. Agents execute on the user's own hardware with their existing credentials, MCP servers, and tooling unchanged. Key workflow features include git worktree isolation for parallel agent runs, branch-based preview URLs, inline diff review, PR handoff, a fully local voice mode, and an end-to-end encrypted relay for secure remote access. The project is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and sustained through GitHub Sponsors.
Paseo is a self-hosted, multi-provider, open source control plane for coding agents. It runs a local daemon on the developer's own machine or server and provides native mobile (iOS/Android), desktop, web, and CLI clients to launch, monitor, steer, and review agent work from anywhere. It wraps the native CLIs of 39+ coding agents without modifying their behavior, preserving each provider's skills, credentials, and MCP server connections. Workflow features including git worktrees, inline diff review, branch-based previews, PR handoff, local voice control, and scriptable orchestration skills make it designed for serious multi-agent development operations rather than single-session use.
Key Facts
- Founded
- 2026
- Founders
- Mo Boudra
- Status
- Open Source / Independent
Target users
Key Capabilities10
- Self-hosted daemon orchestrating 39+ coding agent CLIs from a single control plane
- Native iOS and Android mobile apps with full feature parity to desktop and web
- End-to-end encrypted relay (Curve25519 ECDH + XSalsa20-Poly1305) for remote access without open ports
- Git worktree isolation allowing multiple agents to work in parallel on the same repo
- Branch-based automatic preview URLs (e.g., web.fix-auth.my-app.localhost) eliminating port conflicts
- Inline diff review, commit, PR creation, and merge workflow within the app
- Fully local voice control (speech-to-text and TTS on-device by default)
- Full CLI scriptability mirroring all app capabilities; supports loops, schedules, and remote daemon targeting
- Orchestration skills (handoff, loop, committee, advisor) enabling multi-agent coordination via slash commands
- Split-panel workspace supporting agents, browsers, terminals, and diffs side by side
Key Use Cases7
- Remote monitoring and steering of long-running coding agent tasks from mobile or web after leaving the desk
- Parallel multi-agent development across isolated git worktrees without branch collisions
- Multi-provider agent orchestration (e.g., planning with Claude, implementing with Codex) in a single workflow
- Branch-aware preview, inline code review, and pull-request handoff without switching tools
- Headless agent execution on servers, VMs, or homelabs accessed via CLI or mobile
- Hands-free agent tasking via local voice control during development sessions
- Automated agent loops with acceptance-criteria verification and iteration caps
Recent Trend
How AI describes Paseo1
Paseo (open-source orchestration layer): Supports cross-device control including mobile (iOS/Android) and CLI, with end-to-end encrypted relay for remote access and a fully scriptable CLI.
Which platforms for orchestrating agentic coding CLIs support remote and mobile access so developers can monitor and control running agents away from their desk?
Most cited sources
No cited source mix is available for this brand yet.
Alternatives in Coding Agent Orchestration6
Paseo positions itself as a self-hosted, multi-provider, privacy-first orchestration layer that wraps native coding agent CLIs (Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, OpenCode, Pi, and 34+ others) rather than replacing them.
- Its primary differentiators are cross-device parity across desktop, web, iOS, Android, and CLI surfaces; a branch-oriented multi-agent workflow with git worktree isolation, inline diff review, and PR handoff; an end-to-end encrypted relay for remote access without open ports; and a no-telemetry, no-forced-login AGPL-3.0 open source model funded entirely through GitHub Sponsors.
- Paseo explicitly lists Conductor and Superset as alternatives on its website, indicating awareness of those tools as direct comparisons.
- Unlike hosted wrappers or cloud-native coding agents, Paseo requires users to supply their own upstream agent credentials and run the daemon on their own hardware.
Reviews
Praised
- Best mobile experience in the coding agent orchestration category
- Multi-provider flexibility (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Pi interchangeable)
- Best UI in the segment
- Truly open source with no telemetry or forced login
- Cross-platform parity (phone, desktop, web, CLI)
- Smooth and stable remote access via encrypted relay
- Actively maintained with frequent releases
Criticized
- Requires upstream agent CLIs pre-installed and separately authenticated
- More setup complexity than a single local CLI session
- AGPL-3.0 license may constrain commercial distribution use cases
- Orchestration skills are experimental and subject to breaking changes
- No end-to-end encryption on direct-connection traffic without relay or VPN
Public sentiment gathered from Twitter/X testimonials featured on the Paseo website and a third-party review on VibecodingHub.org is strongly positive among early adopters in the developer community. Recurring praise focuses on the mobile experience (described as full-featured rather than a thin remote viewer), the breadth of provider support, the quality of the UI relative to other orchestrators, and the privacy-first no-telemetry posture. The GitHub repository has accumulated approximately 9,500 stars and 344 forks since its early 2026 launch, indicating rapid grassroots traction. Critical notes center on setup complexity relative to a plain CLI session, the requirement to manage upstream agent credentials independently, and the experimental status of higher-level orchestration skills. No formal review platform scores (G2, Gartner Peer Insights, etc.) were found for this product.
Pricing
Paseo is free and open source (AGPL-3.0). There are no paid tiers, subscriptions, or usage fees for the Paseo software itself. Users bear the costs of their own upstream agent provider subscriptions (Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, etc.) and their own compute infrastructure. The hosted end-to-end encrypted relay is included at no charge. The project is sustained through voluntary GitHub Sponsors contributions.
Limitations
- Paseo is a control plane, not an agent or model provider; users must install and authenticate each upstream agent CLI (Claude Code, Codex, etc.) separately with their own subscriptions and credentials before Paseo is useful.
- Setting up the daemon, optional relay, and cross-device connectivity is meaningfully more complex than a single local CLI session.
- The AGPL-3.0 license may present procurement or distribution constraints for some commercial teams.
- Orchestration skills are explicitly marked experimental and subject to breaking changes.
- The product is early-stage (launched publicly in early 2026) with active development and an open issue backlog.
- Password authentication protects access but does not encrypt direct-connection traffic; end-to-end encryption requires using the relay or a VPN.
Frequently asked questions
Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic
Topic Coverage
Prompt-Level Results
| Prompt | Gemini Search | ChatGPT | Perplexity | Google AI Mode | Bing Copilot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capability0/5 cited (0%) | |||||
What orchestration tools let an engineering manager assign different third-party CLI agents to different ticket types automatically based on task classification? | |||||
Which coding agent orchestration platforms support running agents in fully isolated environments per task to prevent cross-contamination in a monorepo? | |||||
Which multi-agent coding orchestration platforms support human-in-the-loop approval gates before an agent commits or opens a pull request on the code hosting platform? | |||||
Which platforms for orchestrating agentic coding CLIs support remote and mobile access so developers can monitor and control running agents away from their desk? | |||||
I'm looking for a coding agent orchestration tool that handles worktree lifecycle management — creation, cleanup, and conflict resolution — automatically. What are my options? | |||||
Developer Experience0/5 cited (0%) | |||||
What orchestration platforms for multiple agentic CLIs give developers the clearest visibility into what each agent is doing in real time? | |||||
Which multi-agent coding orchestration tools make it easiest for engineers to approve, reject, or redirect an agent mid-task without losing progress? | |||||
Which tools for orchestrating parallel coding agents have the best voice control or natural-language task dispatch experience for individual developers? | |||||
What are the best coding agent orchestration platforms for a tech lead who wants a unified review queue when five agents finish tasks simultaneously? | |||||
Which coding agent orchestration tools have the best UX for reviewing and merging parallel agent-generated changes without context-switching overload? | |||||
Integrations & Ecosystem0/5 cited (0%) | |||||
What coding agent orchestration tools work well with existing CI/CD pipelines to trigger agent tasks automatically on new tickets or failed test runs? | |||||
Which multi-agent coding orchestration platforms integrate with issue trackers and project management tools to automatically pull task context for each agent run? | |||||
What orchestration tools support plugging in any third-party CLI coding agent so teams aren't locked into a single AI provider? | |||||
Which coding agent orchestration platforms integrate with the most popular code hosting platforms for automatic branch creation and pull request submission? | |||||
Which coding agent orchestration platforms have the best ecosystem of integrations for team communication tools — posting agent summaries to workplace chat on completion? | |||||
Performance & Reliability0/5 cited (0%) | |||||
What are the most stable orchestration platforms for parallel coding agents in terms of crash recovery — picking up mid-task if an agent or session dies unexpectedly? | |||||
Which coding agent orchestration platforms give the best observability across simultaneous agent runs so teams can spot runaway tasks or cost spikes early? | |||||
Which orchestration platforms for agentic CLIs do the best job controlling total token spend across many simultaneous agents without sacrificing throughput? | |||||
Which coding agent orchestration tools handle running 10+ parallel agentic CLI sessions reliably without resource contention on a single developer workstation? | |||||
What multi-agent coding orchestration tools are best suited for an enterprise team running hundreds of concurrent agent tasks across large polyglot repositories? | |||||
Setup & First Run0/5 cited (0%) | |||||
I'm evaluating coding agent orchestration platforms for a mid-size team migrating from a single-agent setup — which tools have the smoothest onboarding? | |||||
What coding agent orchestration platforms let a tech lead spin up isolated worktree environments per feature branch with minimal config on day one? | |||||
Which orchestration tools for agentic CLI coding agents work out of the box on popular operating systems without requiring container runtime configuration? | |||||
What's the fastest way to get a Git-based worktree workflow running across multiple agentic CLIs for a 5-person startup engineering team? | |||||
Which coding agent orchestration tools are easiest to set up for a solo developer who already uses a third-party CLI coding agent and wants to run multiple tasks in parallel? | |||||
Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.
Track prompt changesVertical Ranking
| # | Brand | PresencePres. | Share of VoiceSoV | DocsDocs | BlogBlog | MentionsMent. | Avg PosPos | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nimbalyst | 7.2% | 77.8% | 0.0% | 7.2% | 3.2% | #6.1 | +0.61 |
| 2 | Superset | 2.4% | 16.7% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.8% | #3.0 | +0.67 |
| 3 | Sculptor | 0.8% | 5.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | #5.0 | +0.70 |
| 4 | Conductor | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| 5 | HumanLayer | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| 6 | Paseo | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| 7 | T3 Code | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
Turn this into your team dashboard
Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.