AI visibility report
Graphite ranks #6 in AI Code Review & Code Quality AI search.
Outside the top three on 15 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.
Sourcegraph is cited on 8 of those losses.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for Graphite.
Track Graphite across these prompts daily.
Start free trial#6 among 11 vendors · still absent from 92% of tracked prompt responses
Top-3 citations across 150 prompt × platform pairs
Peer Ranking
Key Metrics
Platform Breakdown
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AI Mode
Gemini Search
Bing Copilot
GrokNarrower footprint, stronger tone. Graphite ranks #6 on presence but #3 on sentiment. That means the brand is framed well when it appears, but still needs broader prompt-response coverage.
Where Graphite is losing
Prompts where competitors are visible and Graphite is not.
These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.
Where Graphite is winning4
Which AI code review tools can be added to a pull request workflow in under 30 minutes with no changes to existing CI pipelines?
Avg # 1.0 · 1 platform
Which AI code review tools complete their analysis fast enough to not delay a PR workflow — which ones consistently finish within 2 minutes?
Avg # 2.0 · 1 platform
What code quality platforms have the lowest false positive rate so developers don't spend time dismissing irrelevant warnings?
Avg # 2.5 · 2 platforms
Which AI code review tools can detect security vulnerabilities and insecure coding patterns across multiple languages in the same repository?
Avg # 3.0 · 1 platform
Where Graphite is losing5
I need a code quality tool that enforces quality gates in CI and blocks merges when coverage drops or critical issues are introduced — which platforms do this well?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhat code analysis platforms have reliable CI integrations that don't cause flaky build failures due to rate limiting or API timeouts?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhat code quality platforms scale to thousands of PRs per day without degrading analysis quality or response time?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhat AI code review tools can analyze infrastructure-as-code files alongside application code for a full-stack security posture review?
Competitors on 2 platforms
Track this promptI'm evaluating AI pull request review tools for a Python and TypeScript codebase — which ones require the least configuration to get useful feedback from day one?
Competitors on 2 platforms
Track this prompt
Track Graphite daily before the next report refresh.
Track these gapsResearch dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ
Overview
Graphite (Screenplay Studios Inc.) is a New York-based AI code review platform founded in 2020 by Merrill Lutsky, Tomas Reimers, and Greg Foster. Built natively on top of GitHub, it combines two core innovations: a stacked pull request workflow—allowing developers to create chains of small, sequential code changes and continue working while earlier PRs are under review—and Graphite Agent, a codebase-aware AI reviewer that delivers automated, high-signal feedback on every pull request. The platform also includes a stack-aware merge queue, unified PR inbox, CI optimizer, developer metrics, Slack and VS Code integrations, and an embedded conversational AI (Graphite Chat). Serving tens of thousands of engineers at over 500 companies including Shopify, Snowflake, Figma, and Ramp, Graphite raised a $52M Series B in March 2025 and was acquired by Cursor in December 2025.
Graphite is an AI-powered code review and pull request workflow platform for GitHub-based engineering teams. Its signature capability—stacked pull requests—lets developers break large changes into small, sequential PRs and keep shipping while earlier changes are under review, with automatic rebasing handled by the CLI. Layered on top is Graphite Agent, a codebase-aware AI reviewer that posts actionable feedback, suggested fixes, CI failure diagnoses, and PR summaries on every pull request. Additional platform features include a stack-aware merge queue, unified PR inbox, CI optimizer, developer productivity insights, Slack notifications, a VS Code extension, and embedded conversational AI (Graphite Chat). Acquired by Cursor in December 2025, Graphite continues to operate independently while integrating Cursor's AI coding agents into its PR workflow.
Key Facts
- Founded
- 2020
- HQ
- New York, NY, USA
- Founders
- Merrill Lutsky, Tomas Reimers, Greg Foster
- Employees
- ~100
- Funding
- ~$72M
- Customers
- 500+ companies, tens of thousands of eng
- Valuation
- $290M (last private round, Mar 2025; acq
- Status
- Acquired by Cursor (Dec 2025), operating independently
Target users
Key Capabilities9
- Stacked pull requests: CLI and VS Code extension for creating, managing, and auto-rebasing chains of dependent PRs
- Graphite Agent (AI Reviews): codebase-aware AI reviewer that catches bugs, suggests fixes, and summarizes PRs on every push
- Graphite Chat: conversational AI embedded in the PR page to resolve CI failures and apply code suggestions
- Stack-aware Merge Queue: batches and tests stacked PRs in parallel, keeps main branch green
- Unified PR Inbox: cross-repo PR triage with custom filters, assignments, and Slack/macOS notifications
- CI Optimizer: skips redundant CI runs on intermediate stacked branches to reduce pipeline waste
- Developer Insights & Metrics: real-time engineering productivity analytics (cycle time, PR size, throughput)
- Automations & Reviewer Assignment: rule-based auto-assignment and workflow triggers
- Cursor Cloud Agent integration: create, review, and ship AI-agent-generated PRs without leaving Graphite
Key Use Cases7
- Accelerating PR review cycles for high-velocity engineering teams on GitHub
- Enabling trunk-based development with stacked diffs to avoid large, hard-to-review PRs
- Scaling monorepo workflows where large changes must be broken into reviewable increments
- Automating first-pass code review with AI to reduce back-and-forth review cycles
- Managing merge queues and preventing main-branch breakage at team or enterprise scale
- Integrating AI-generated code (from Cursor, Copilot, etc.) into a structured human review workflow
- Measuring and optimizing developer productivity with DORA-adjacent engineering metrics
Graphite customer outcomes
21% more code shipped, 7 hours/week saved per engineer
Engineers at Asana shipped 21% more code and merged 17% more pull requests within their first 30 days on Graphite compared to the 30 days before. Median PR size shrank by 11%, and engineers saved an average of 7 hours per week.
74% decrease in median time between PRs merged
Median time between PRs merged dropped from ~10 hours to ~3 hours after adopting Graphite, enabling the team to merge PRs three times faster while maintaining output quality.
33% increase in PRs shipped per developer
Shopify saw a 33% increase in PRs shipped per developer since adopting Graphite's stacked PR workflow across its monorepo, with 22% of all merged PRs now part of a stack.
Recent Trend
How AI describes Graphite3
Graphite (AI Reviewer / Cursor Bugbot) * Average Speed: Under 1 minute. * How it works: Graphite is designed heavily around "stacked PRs" (breaking large changes into small, sequential PRs).
Which AI code review tools complete their analysis fast enough to not delay a PR workflow — which ones consistently finish within 2 minutes?
Graphite (Graphite Agent) ----------------------------- * How it works: Graphite is famous for popularizing the "stacked PRs" workflow (breaking massive changes into tiny, dependent PRs).
What AI code review tools integrate with IDE plugins so developers get the same automated feedback locally before pushing a pull request?
Graphite Agent If your team uses Graphite for stacked diffs or standard GitHub PRs, their native AI Agent handles automated code reviews natively.
Which AI code review tools can be added to a pull request workflow in under 30 minutes with no changes to existing CI pipelines?
Most cited sources8
5Top AI code review security scanners - Graphite
graphite.com·Listicle
- 5
Graphite - Code review for the age of AI
graphite.com·Documentation
- 4
Best AI pull request reviewers in 2025
graphite.com·Documentation
- 4
Top AI code review tools that reduce review latency
graphite.com·Documentation
- 3
Top AI code review security scanners - graphite.com
graphite.com·Listicle
- 3
Top AI code review platforms in 2025
graphite.com·Blog Post
Alternatives in AI Code Review & Code Quality6
Graphite positions itself as the AI-native 'outer loop' platform for the GitHub pull request workflow, differentiating on two complementary pillars: (1) stacked pull requests—a workflow borrowed from elite internal tools like Meta's Phabricator and Google's Critique—that lets developers work on dependent changes in parallel without waiting for upstream approvals, and (2) a codebase-aware AI reviewer (Graphite Agent, formerly Diamond) that delivers high-signal, low-noise automated feedback on every PR.
- Unlike static-analysis-first competitors (SonarSource, Semgrep, Codacy, DeepSource) focused on security or code hygiene, or AI review overlays (CodeRabbit, Qodo), Graphite bundles the full review lifecycle—CLI, VS Code extension, PR inbox, merge queue, CI optimizer, developer insights, Slack notifications, and AI review—into one GitHub-integrated platform.
- Its December 2025 acquisition by Cursor positions it to bridge the AI code-writing 'inner loop' with the code-review 'outer loop' in a unified end-to-end development platform.
Reviews
Praised
- Ergonomic CLI for stacked PR management
- Automated rebasing eliminates 'wrangling git' pain
- Smaller, more focused PRs improve review quality
- AI reviewer catches real bugs with low noise
- VS Code extension makes stacking visual and intuitive
- Significant time savings (hours per week per engineer)
- Seamless GitHub integration requiring minimal setup
- Active, responsive product team and community
Criticized
- Steep learning curve for stacking paradigm, especially for junior engineers
- GitHub-only; no GitLab or Bitbucket support
- Full AI features locked behind $40/user Team plan
- Acquisition by Cursor creates roadmap uncertainty
- Not a replacement for dedicated security or static-analysis tooling
Developer sentiment on Product Hunt and community forums is strongly positive, particularly from engineers with prior experience at Meta or Google who recognize the stacked-diff workflow. Praised themes include the ergonomic CLI, time savings from automated restacking, smaller PR sizes leading to faster and higher-quality reviews, and the VS Code extension's visual stacking interface. The AI reviewer (Graphite Agent) is credited with catching real bugs that human reviewers miss without generating excessive noise. Criticisms center on a steep learning curve for the stacking paradigm, GitHub-only support limiting cross-platform teams, and the perception that full value requires upgrading to the $40/user Team plan. No verified aggregate rating on G2 or Gartner Peer Insights was found for graphite.com's code-review product specifically.
Pricing
Four tiers: Hobby (free, personal repos, limited AI Reviews and Chat, CLI/VS Code/MCP); Starter ($20/user/month billed annually, all GitHub org repos, Slack notifications, team insights); Team ($40/user/month billed annually, unlimited AI Reviews and Chat, AI review customizations, automations, merge queue—most popular tier); Enterprise (custom pricing, advanced merge queue, SAML/SSO, ACLs, audit log/SIEM, GHES support, premium SLAs, custom MSA). A 30-day free trial is offered for the Team plan. Annual billing provides approximately 20% savings versus monthly.
Limitations
- Graphite is GitHub-only; no native support for GitLab, Bitbucket, or Azure DevOps.
- The stacked-PR workflow carries a learning curve, particularly for junior engineers unfamiliar with the paradigm.
- It is primarily a workflow and AI review platform rather than a static-analysis or security-scanning tool, so teams seeking SAST, SCA, or compliance-grade security analysis still need separate tooling (e.g., Semgrep, Snyk, SonarQube).
- The free Hobby tier caps AI Reviews and Chat; full AI capabilities require the $40/user/month Team plan.
- Being acquired by Cursor (Dec 2025) introduces uncertainty about long-term independent roadmap and pricing.
Frequently asked questions
Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic
Topic Coverage
Prompt-Level Results
| Prompt | Google AI Mode | Bing Copilot | Perplexity | ChatGPT | Gemini Search | Grok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capability3/5 cited (60%) | ||||||
I need a code quality tool that enforces quality gates in CI and blocks merges when coverage drops or critical issues are introduced — which platforms do this well? | ||||||
Which AI code review tools can detect security vulnerabilities and insecure coding patterns across multiple languages in the same repository? | ||||||
What AI code review tools can analyze infrastructure-as-code files alongside application code for a full-stack security posture review? | ||||||
What code quality platforms track technical debt trends over time and show whether the team is paying it down or accumulating more? | ||||||
Which AI PR review tools can summarize large diffs and give an overall assessment of a pull request rather than only commenting line by line? | ||||||
Developer Experience2/5 cited (40%) | ||||||
Looking for an AI PR review tool that learns from the codebase and past review decisions so feedback improves over time — what are my options? | ||||||
What AI code review platforms are popular with engineering leads who want to spend less time on repetitive PR feedback and more on architectural comments? | ||||||
Which code quality tools let teams define custom rules and guardrails specific to their architecture so the tool enforces their own conventions? | ||||||
Which AI code review tools give feedback that engineers actually find useful — not just style nitpicks but real logic and security issues? | ||||||
What code quality platforms have the lowest false positive rate so developers don't spend time dismissing irrelevant warnings? | ||||||
Integrations & Ecosystem1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
What code review tools work across both cloud-hosted and on-premises version control systems for teams with a hybrid repository strategy? | ||||||
Which AI PR review platforms support self-hosted deployments that keep code on-premises and don't send source code to third-party models? | ||||||
Which code quality platforms integrate with issue trackers to automatically create tickets for critical issues found during code review? | ||||||
Looking for a code quality tool that feeds results into a security dashboard for CISO-level reporting — which platforms have strong SIEM and security integrations? | ||||||
What AI code review tools integrate with IDE plugins so developers get the same automated feedback locally before pushing a pull request? | ||||||
Performance & Reliability2/5 cited (40%) | ||||||
What code analysis platforms have reliable CI integrations that don't cause flaky build failures due to rate limiting or API timeouts? | ||||||
Which AI code review tools complete their analysis fast enough to not delay a PR workflow — which ones consistently finish within 2 minutes? | ||||||
Which AI code review tools maintain consistent review quality across a polyglot repository with Go, Python, and TypeScript services? | ||||||
Which AI review tools handle very large pull requests with 500+ changed files without timing out or producing incomplete feedback? | ||||||
What code quality platforms scale to thousands of PRs per day without degrading analysis quality or response time? | ||||||
Setup & First Run2/5 cited (40%) | ||||||
Which code quality platforms can analyze a 500k-line legacy codebase and give a prioritized technical debt report without manual configuration? | ||||||
I'm evaluating AI pull request review tools for a Python and TypeScript codebase — which ones require the least configuration to get useful feedback from day one? | ||||||
What AI code review tools have the smoothest version control platform integration so reviews appear inline on diffs automatically on every PR? | ||||||
Which AI code review tools can be added to a pull request workflow in under 30 minutes with no changes to existing CI pipelines? | ||||||
What are the best automated code quality tools for a team of 15 engineers that wants to enforce standards without a dedicated security engineer? | ||||||
Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.
Track prompt changesVertical Ranking
| # | Brand | PresencePres. | Share of VoiceSoV | DocsDocs | BlogBlog | MentionsMent. | Avg PosPos | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qodo | 14.0% | 18.3% | 0.7% | 8.0% | 12.7% | #8.9 | +0.42 |
| 2 | CodeRabbit | 11.3% | 13.1% | 4.0% | 1.3% | 9.3% | #9.1 | +0.39 |
| 3 | SonarSource | 10.7% | 14.7% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 8.7% | #8.3 | +0.39 |
| 4 | Greptile | 10.0% | 11.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.7% | #7.8 | +0.49 |
| 5 | Sourcegraph | 8.7% | 8.4% | 0.0% | 8.7% | 8.7% | #3.8 | +0.38 |
| 6 | Graphite | 8.0% | 8.9% | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.0% | #6.6 | +0.47 |
| 7 | Snyk | 6.7% | 7.9% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 6.0% | #10.9 | +0.40 |
| 8 | DeepSource | 4.7% | 4.7% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 4.0% | #7.9 | +0.36 |
| 9 | Codacy | 4.0% | 6.3% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 4.0% | #8.7 | +0.10 |
| 10 | Semgrep | 3.3% | 3.1% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 3.3% | #18.5 | +0.48 |
| 11 | Code Climate | 1.3% | 3.1% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.7% | #6.7 | +0.45 |
Turn this into your team dashboard
Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.