AI visibility report
Graphite ranks #11 in AI Code Review & Code Quality AI search.
Outside the top three on 23 of the 25 prompts buyers actually ask.
CodeRabbit is cited on 10 of those losses.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled for Graphite.
Track Graphite across these prompts daily.
Start free trial#11 among 11 vendors · still absent from 99.3% of tracked prompt responses
Top-3 citations across 150 prompt × platform pairs
Peer Ranking
Key Metrics
Platform Breakdown
Google AI Mode
Bing Copilot
ChatGPT
Gemini Search
Perplexity
GrokHow to read this. Graphite appears in 0.7% of tracked prompt responses and ranks #11 among 11 vendors. Presence is absolute coverage; share of voice is relative citation share; sentiment measures tone only when the brand appears.
Where Graphite is losing
Prompts where competitors are visible and Graphite is not.
These prompt-level losses are the first prompts to track and repair.
Where Graphite is winning
No clear strengths identified yet.
Where Graphite is losing5
Which AI code review tools can detect security vulnerabilities and insecure coding patterns across multiple languages in the same repository?
Competitors on 5 platforms
Track this promptWhat AI code review platforms are popular with engineering leads who want to spend less time on repetitive PR feedback and more on architectural comments?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptLooking for an AI PR review tool that learns from the codebase and past review decisions so feedback improves over time — what are my options?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhich AI PR review tools can summarize large diffs and give an overall assessment of a pull request rather than only commenting line by line?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this promptWhat code quality platforms scale to thousands of PRs per day without degrading analysis quality or response time?
Competitors on 3 platforms
Track this prompt
Track Graphite daily before the next report refresh.
Track these gapsResearch dossierCapabilities, use cases, sources, reviews, pricing, and FAQ
Overview
Graphite (Screenplay Studios Inc.) is a New York-based AI code review platform founded in 2020 by Merrill Lutsky, Tomas Reimers, and Greg Foster. Built natively on top of GitHub, it combines two core innovations: a stacked pull request workflow—allowing developers to create chains of small, sequential code changes and continue working while earlier PRs are under review—and Graphite Agent, a codebase-aware AI reviewer that delivers automated, high-signal feedback on every pull request. The platform also includes a stack-aware merge queue, unified PR inbox, CI optimizer, developer metrics, Slack and VS Code integrations, and an embedded conversational AI (Graphite Chat). Serving tens of thousands of engineers at over 500 companies including Shopify, Snowflake, Figma, and Ramp, Graphite raised a $52M Series B in March 2025 and was acquired by Cursor in December 2025.
Graphite is an AI-powered code review and pull request workflow platform for GitHub-based engineering teams. Its signature capability—stacked pull requests—lets developers break large changes into small, sequential PRs and keep shipping while earlier changes are under review, with automatic rebasing handled by the CLI. Layered on top is Graphite Agent, a codebase-aware AI reviewer that posts actionable feedback, suggested fixes, CI failure diagnoses, and PR summaries on every pull request. Additional platform features include a stack-aware merge queue, unified PR inbox, CI optimizer, developer productivity insights, Slack notifications, a VS Code extension, and embedded conversational AI (Graphite Chat). Acquired by Cursor in December 2025, Graphite continues to operate independently while integrating Cursor's AI coding agents into its PR workflow.
Key Facts
- Founded
- 2020
- HQ
- New York, NY, USA
- Founders
- Merrill Lutsky, Tomas Reimers, Greg Foster
- Employees
- ~100
- Funding
- ~$72M
- Customers
- 500+ companies, tens of thousands of eng
- Valuation
- $290M (last private round, Mar 2025; acq
- Status
- Acquired by Cursor (Dec 2025), operating independently
Target users
Key Capabilities9
- Stacked pull requests: CLI and VS Code extension for creating, managing, and auto-rebasing chains of dependent PRs
- Graphite Agent (AI Reviews): codebase-aware AI reviewer that catches bugs, suggests fixes, and summarizes PRs on every push
- Graphite Chat: conversational AI embedded in the PR page to resolve CI failures and apply code suggestions
- Stack-aware Merge Queue: batches and tests stacked PRs in parallel, keeps main branch green
- Unified PR Inbox: cross-repo PR triage with custom filters, assignments, and Slack/macOS notifications
- CI Optimizer: skips redundant CI runs on intermediate stacked branches to reduce pipeline waste
- Developer Insights & Metrics: real-time engineering productivity analytics (cycle time, PR size, throughput)
- Automations & Reviewer Assignment: rule-based auto-assignment and workflow triggers
- Cursor Cloud Agent integration: create, review, and ship AI-agent-generated PRs without leaving Graphite
Key Use Cases7
- Accelerating PR review cycles for high-velocity engineering teams on GitHub
- Enabling trunk-based development with stacked diffs to avoid large, hard-to-review PRs
- Scaling monorepo workflows where large changes must be broken into reviewable increments
- Automating first-pass code review with AI to reduce back-and-forth review cycles
- Managing merge queues and preventing main-branch breakage at team or enterprise scale
- Integrating AI-generated code (from Cursor, Copilot, etc.) into a structured human review workflow
- Measuring and optimizing developer productivity with DORA-adjacent engineering metrics
Graphite customer outcomes
21% more code shipped, 7 hours/week saved per engineer
Engineers at Asana shipped 21% more code and merged 17% more pull requests within their first 30 days on Graphite compared to the 30 days before. Median PR size shrank by 11%, and engineers saved an average of 7 hours per week.
74% decrease in median time between PRs merged
Median time between PRs merged dropped from ~10 hours to ~3 hours after adopting Graphite, enabling the team to merge PRs three times faster while maintaining output quality.
33% increase in PRs shipped per developer
Shopify saw a 33% increase in PRs shipped per developer since adopting Graphite's stacked PR workflow across its monorepo, with 22% of all merged PRs now part of a stack.
Recent Trend
How AI describes Graphite3
...ges look reasonable" padding, break the architectural intent down into stacked pull requests using a workflow manager like Graphite . [https://dev.to/heraldofsolace/stacking-up-graphite-in-the-world-of-code-review-tools-5fbn](https://dev.to/heraldofsol...
Which AI code review tools complete their analysis fast enough to not delay a PR workflow — which ones consistently finish within 2 minutes?
https://graphite.com/guides/best-ai-code-review-plugin-vscode  are CodeRabbit, DeepSource, Sourcery, Codacy, GitHub Copilot Code Review, and Graphite Agent. These tools are optimized for speed and typically return actionable feedback in under 2 minutes, making them suit...
Which AI code review tools complete their analysis fast enough to not delay a PR workflow — which ones consistently finish within 2 minutes?
Most cited sources1
Alternatives in AI Code Review & Code Quality6
Graphite positions itself as the AI-native 'outer loop' platform for the GitHub pull request workflow, differentiating on two complementary pillars: (1) stacked pull requests—a workflow borrowed from elite internal tools like Meta's Phabricator and Google's Critique—that lets developers work on dependent changes in parallel without waiting for upstream approvals, and (2) a codebase-aware AI reviewer (Graphite Agent, formerly Diamond) that delivers high-signal, low-noise automated feedback on every PR.
- Unlike static-analysis-first competitors (SonarSource, Semgrep, Codacy, DeepSource) focused on security or code hygiene, or AI review overlays (CodeRabbit, Qodo), Graphite bundles the full review lifecycle—CLI, VS Code extension, PR inbox, merge queue, CI optimizer, developer insights, Slack notifications, and AI review—into one GitHub-integrated platform.
- Its December 2025 acquisition by Cursor positions it to bridge the AI code-writing 'inner loop' with the code-review 'outer loop' in a unified end-to-end development platform.
Reviews
Praised
- Ergonomic CLI for stacked PR management
- Automated rebasing eliminates 'wrangling git' pain
- Smaller, more focused PRs improve review quality
- AI reviewer catches real bugs with low noise
- VS Code extension makes stacking visual and intuitive
- Significant time savings (hours per week per engineer)
- Seamless GitHub integration requiring minimal setup
- Active, responsive product team and community
Criticized
- Steep learning curve for stacking paradigm, especially for junior engineers
- GitHub-only; no GitLab or Bitbucket support
- Full AI features locked behind $40/user Team plan
- Acquisition by Cursor creates roadmap uncertainty
- Not a replacement for dedicated security or static-analysis tooling
Developer sentiment on Product Hunt and community forums is strongly positive, particularly from engineers with prior experience at Meta or Google who recognize the stacked-diff workflow. Praised themes include the ergonomic CLI, time savings from automated restacking, smaller PR sizes leading to faster and higher-quality reviews, and the VS Code extension's visual stacking interface. The AI reviewer (Graphite Agent) is credited with catching real bugs that human reviewers miss without generating excessive noise. Criticisms center on a steep learning curve for the stacking paradigm, GitHub-only support limiting cross-platform teams, and the perception that full value requires upgrading to the $40/user Team plan. No verified aggregate rating on G2 or Gartner Peer Insights was found for graphite.com's code-review product specifically.
Pricing
Four tiers: Hobby (free, personal repos, limited AI Reviews and Chat, CLI/VS Code/MCP); Starter ($20/user/month billed annually, all GitHub org repos, Slack notifications, team insights); Team ($40/user/month billed annually, unlimited AI Reviews and Chat, AI review customizations, automations, merge queue—most popular tier); Enterprise (custom pricing, advanced merge queue, SAML/SSO, ACLs, audit log/SIEM, GHES support, premium SLAs, custom MSA). A 30-day free trial is offered for the Team plan. Annual billing provides approximately 20% savings versus monthly.
Limitations
- Graphite is GitHub-only; no native support for GitLab, Bitbucket, or Azure DevOps.
- The stacked-PR workflow carries a learning curve, particularly for junior engineers unfamiliar with the paradigm.
- It is primarily a workflow and AI review platform rather than a static-analysis or security-scanning tool, so teams seeking SAST, SCA, or compliance-grade security analysis still need separate tooling (e.g., Semgrep, Snyk, SonarQube).
- The free Hobby tier caps AI Reviews and Chat; full AI capabilities require the $40/user/month Team plan.
- Being acquired by Cursor (Dec 2025) introduces uncertainty about long-term independent roadmap and pricing.
Frequently asked questions
Topic coverageCoverage by buyer topic
Topic Coverage
Prompt-Level Results
| Prompt | Bing Copilot | ChatGPT | Google AI Mode | Gemini Search | Perplexity | Grok |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capability0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
What AI code review tools can analyze infrastructure-as-code files alongside application code for a full-stack security posture review? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which AI PR review tools can summarize large diffs and give an overall assessment of a pull request rather than only commenting line by line? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
I need a code quality tool that enforces quality gates in CI and blocks merges when coverage drops or critical issues are introduced — which platforms do this well? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What code quality platforms track technical debt trends over time and show whether the team is paying it down or accumulating more? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which AI code review tools can detect security vulnerabilities and insecure coding patterns across multiple languages in the same repository? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Developer Experience0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
What AI code review platforms are popular with engineering leads who want to spend less time on repetitive PR feedback and more on architectural comments? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which AI code review tools give feedback that engineers actually find useful — not just style nitpicks but real logic and security issues? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Looking for an AI PR review tool that learns from the codebase and past review decisions so feedback improves over time — what are my options? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What code quality platforms have the lowest false positive rate so developers don't spend time dismissing irrelevant warnings? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which code quality tools let teams define custom rules and guardrails specific to their architecture so the tool enforces their own conventions? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Integrations & Ecosystem1/5 cited (20%) | ||||||
What code review tools work across both cloud-hosted and on-premises version control systems for teams with a hybrid repository strategy? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Your brand and a competitor were cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Looking for a code quality tool that feeds results into a security dashboard for CISO-level reporting — which platforms have strong SIEM and security integrations? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which code quality platforms integrate with issue trackers to automatically create tickets for critical issues found during code review? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which AI PR review platforms support self-hosted deployments that keep code on-premises and don't send source code to third-party models? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What AI code review tools integrate with IDE plugins so developers get the same automated feedback locally before pushing a pull request? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Performance & Reliability0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
What code analysis platforms have reliable CI integrations that don't cause flaky build failures due to rate limiting or API timeouts? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What code quality platforms scale to thousands of PRs per day without degrading analysis quality or response time? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which AI review tools handle very large pull requests with 500+ changed files without timing out or producing incomplete feedback? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which AI code review tools complete their analysis fast enough to not delay a PR workflow — which ones consistently finish within 2 minutes? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which AI code review tools maintain consistent review quality across a polyglot repository with Go, Python, and TypeScript services? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Setup & First Run0/5 cited (0%) | ||||||
Which code quality platforms can analyze a 500k-line legacy codebase and give a prioritized technical debt report without manual configuration? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Which AI code review tools can be added to a pull request workflow in under 30 minutes with no changes to existing CI pipelines? | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
I'm evaluating AI pull request review tools for a Python and TypeScript codebase — which ones require the least configuration to get useful feedback from day one? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What AI code review tools have the smoothest version control platform integration so reviews appear inline on diffs automatically on every PR? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
What are the best automated code quality tools for a team of 15 engineers that wants to enforce standards without a dedicated security engineer? | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited | A competitor was cited | Neither your brand nor a competitor was cited |
Turn this matrix into daily prompt monitoring.
Track prompt changesVertical Ranking
| # | Brand | PresencePres. | Share of VoiceSoV | DocsDocs | BlogBlog | MentionsMent. | Avg PosPos | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sourcegraph | 16.0% | 16.8% | 0.0% | 16.0% | 0.0% | #4.2 | +0.20 |
| 2 | Greptile | 16.0% | 18.3% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 24.0% | #4.6 | +0.36 |
| 3 | Qodo | 14.7% | 16.2% | 3.3% | 9.3% | 35.3% | #5.3 | +0.46 |
| 4 | CodeRabbit | 11.3% | 14.1% | 6.7% | 0.7% | 40.0% | #3.3 | +0.56 |
| 5 | SonarSource | 10.0% | 13.6% | 4.0% | 1.3% | 8.0% | #3.2 | +0.43 |
| 6 | DeepSource | 5.3% | 5.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 14.0% | #3.8 | +0.45 |
| 7 | Snyk | 5.3% | 5.2% | 2.0% | 0.7% | 22.0% | #4.5 | +0.51 |
| 8 | Semgrep | 4.0% | 6.3% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 0.0% | #5.5 | +0.75 |
| 9 | Codacy | 1.3% | 2.6% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 13.3% | #3.0 | +0.35 |
| 10 | Code Climate | 1.3% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.0% | #4.5 | +0.60 |
| 11 | Graphite | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.0% | #2.0 | +0.00 |
Turn this into your team dashboard
Sign up to unlock project-level analytics, daily tracking, actionable insights, custom prompt configurations, adoption tracking, AI traffic analytics and more.
Free trial. Setup comes pre-filled from this report.