# Graphite AI visibility in AI Code Review & Code Quality

Canonical: https://devtune.ai/verticals/ai-code-review-and-code-quality/graphite

[Website](https://graphite.com/)

Updated: 2026-09-27T22:41:07.149577+00:00
Prompts: 25
Runs: 6


## Platforms

- google-ai-mode
- perplexity
- bing-copilot-search
- chatgpt-search
- google-ai
- xai-search

Rank: 10
Total brands: 11
Measured responses: 150
Presence percent: 0.6666666666666667
Share of voice percent: 1.7751479289940828
Average position: 2
Docs presence percent: 0
Blog presence percent: 0.6666666666666667
Brand mention percent: 0


## Profile

Overview: Graphite (Screenplay Studios Inc.) is a New York-based AI code review platform founded in 2020 by Merrill Lutsky, Tomas Reimers, and Greg Foster. Built natively on top of GitHub, it combines two core innovations: a stacked pull request workflow—allowing developers to create chains of small, sequential code changes and continue working while earlier PRs are under review—and Graphite Agent, a codebase-aware AI reviewer that delivers automated, high-signal feedback on every pull request. The platform also includes a stack-aware merge queue, unified PR inbox, CI optimizer, developer metrics, Slack and VS Code integrations, and an embedded conversational AI (Graphite Chat). Serving tens of thousands of engineers at over 500 companies including Shopify, Snowflake, Figma, and Ramp, Graphite raised a $52M Series B in March 2025 and was acquired by Cursor in December 2025.
Product summary: Graphite is an AI-powered code review and pull request workflow platform for GitHub-based engineering teams. Its signature capability—stacked pull requests—lets developers break large changes into small, sequential PRs and keep shipping while earlier changes are under review, with automatic rebasing handled by the CLI. Layered on top is Graphite Agent, a codebase-aware AI reviewer that posts actionable feedback, suggested fixes, CI failure diagnoses, and PR summaries on every pull request. Additional platform features include a stack-aware merge queue, unified PR inbox, CI optimizer, developer productivity insights, Slack notifications, a VS Code extension, and embedded conversational AI (Graphite Chat). Acquired by Cursor in December 2025, Graphite continues to operate independently while integrating Cursor's AI coding agents into its PR workflow.


### Key capabilities

- Stacked pull requests: CLI and VS Code extension for creating, managing, and auto-rebasing chains of dependent PRs
- Graphite Agent (AI Reviews): codebase-aware AI reviewer that catches bugs, suggests fixes, and summarizes PRs on every push
- Graphite Chat: conversational AI embedded in the PR page to resolve CI failures and apply code suggestions
- Stack-aware Merge Queue: batches and tests stacked PRs in parallel, keeps main branch green
- Unified PR Inbox: cross-repo PR triage with custom filters, assignments, and Slack/macOS notifications
- CI Optimizer: skips redundant CI runs on intermediate stacked branches to reduce pipeline waste
- Developer Insights & Metrics: real-time engineering productivity analytics (cycle time, PR size, throughput)
- Automations & Reviewer Assignment: rule-based auto-assignment and workflow triggers
- Cursor Cloud Agent integration: create, review, and ship AI-agent-generated PRs without leaving Graphite



### Target users

- Software engineers at GitHub-native teams seeking faster PR review cycles
- Engineering leaders and developer-productivity teams at mid-size to large technology companies
- Monorepo engineering teams managing large, complex codebases (e.g., Shopify-scale)
- Ex-Meta/Google engineers familiar with stacked-diff workflows (Phabricator, Critique)
- Teams adopting AI code generation tools (Cursor, Copilot) needing a structured review layer
- Enterprise engineering organizations requiring merge-queue automation and developer metrics



### Key use cases

- Accelerating PR review cycles for high-velocity engineering teams on GitHub
- Enabling trunk-based development with stacked diffs to avoid large, hard-to-review PRs
- Scaling monorepo workflows where large changes must be broken into reviewable increments
- Automating first-pass code review with AI to reduce back-and-forth review cycles
- Managing merge queues and preventing main-branch breakage at team or enterprise scale
- Integrating AI-generated code (from Cursor, Copilot, etc.) into a structured human review workflow
- Measuring and optimizing developer productivity with DORA-adjacent engineering metrics

Integrations ecosystem: Graphite is built natively on top of GitHub's APIs and supports GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Server (GHES). Core integrations include: Slack (actionable PR notifications), Linear (issue linking), VS Code (extension for stacked-PR management), macOS Menu Bar App, and an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server. Graphite Chat incorporates LLMs from OpenAI and Anthropic for codebase-aware review. CI systems are supported via CI Optimizations and merge-queue hooks. Post-acquisition, Cursor Cloud Agents are now available directly within the Graphite PR interface. The CLI (gt) integrates with standard Git workflows, aliases, and scripts.
Pricing summary: Four tiers: Hobby (free, personal repos, limited AI Reviews and Chat, CLI/VS Code/MCP); Starter ($20/user/month billed annually, all GitHub org repos, Slack notifications, team insights); Team ($40/user/month billed annually, unlimited AI Reviews and Chat, AI review customizations, automations, merge queue—most popular tier); Enterprise (custom pricing, advanced merge queue, SAML/SSO, ACLs, audit log/SIEM, GHES support, premium SLAs, custom MSA). A 30-day free trial is offered for the Team plan. Annual billing provides approximately 20% savings versus monthly.
Review summary: Developer sentiment on Product Hunt and community forums is strongly positive, particularly from engineers with prior experience at Meta or Google who recognize the stacked-diff workflow. Praised themes include the ergonomic CLI, time savings from automated restacking, smaller PR sizes leading to faster and higher-quality reviews, and the VS Code extension's visual stacking interface. The AI reviewer (Graphite Agent) is credited with catching real bugs that human reviewers miss without generating excessive noise. Criticisms center on a steep learning curve for the stacking paradigm, GitHub-only support limiting cross-platform teams, and the perception that full value requires upgrading to the $40/user Team plan. No verified aggregate rating on G2 or Gartner Peer Insights was found for graphite.com's code-review product specifically.
Competitive positioning: Graphite positions itself as the AI-native 'outer loop' platform for the GitHub pull request workflow, differentiating on two complementary pillars: (1) stacked pull requests—a workflow borrowed from elite internal tools like Meta's Phabricator and Google's Critique—that lets developers work on dependent changes in parallel without waiting for upstream approvals, and (2) a codebase-aware AI reviewer (Graphite Agent, formerly Diamond) that delivers high-signal, low-noise automated feedback on every PR. Unlike static-analysis-first competitors (SonarSource, Semgrep, Codacy, DeepSource) focused on security or code hygiene, or AI review overlays (CodeRabbit, Qodo), Graphite bundles the full review lifecycle—CLI, VS Code extension, PR inbox, merge queue, CI optimizer, developer insights, Slack notifications, and AI review—into one GitHub-integrated platform. Its December 2025 acquisition by Cursor positions it to bridge the AI code-writing 'inner loop' with the code-review 'outer loop' in a unified end-to-end development platform.
Limitations: Graphite is GitHub-only; no native support for GitLab, Bitbucket, or Azure DevOps. The stacked-PR workflow carries a learning curve, particularly for junior engineers unfamiliar with the paradigm. It is primarily a workflow and AI review platform rather than a static-analysis or security-scanning tool, so teams seeking SAST, SCA, or compliance-grade security analysis still need separate tooling (e.g., Semgrep, Snyk, SonarQube). The free Hobby tier caps AI Reviews and Chat; full AI capabilities require the $40/user/month Team plan. Being acquired by Cursor (Dec 2025) introduces uncertainty about long-term independent roadmap and pricing.


### Source urls

- https://graphite.com/
- https://graphite.com/pricing
- https://graphite.com/customers
- https://graphite.com/customer/asana
- https://graphite.com/customer/ramp
- https://graphite.com/customer/shopify
- https://graphite.com/blog/series-b-diamond-launch
- https://graphite.com/blog/graphite-joins-cursor
- https://graphite.com/terms-of-service
- https://graphite.com/docs/get-started
- https://techcrunch.com/2025/12/19/cursor-continues-acquisition-spree-with-graphite-deal/
- https://fortune.com/2025/12/19/cursor-ai-coding-startup-graphite-competition-heats-up/
- https://www.thesaasnews.com/news/graphite-raises-52-million-in-series-b
- https://siliconangle.com/2025/03/18/ai-code-assist-startup-graphite-raises-52m-try-keep-ahead-competition/
- https://www.git-tower.com/blog/graphite
- https://dev.to/heraldofsolace/stacking-up-graphite-in-the-world-of-code-review-tools-5fbn
- https://www.producthunt.com/products/graphite/reviews
- https://cursor.com/blog/graphite

Reviewed at: 2026-04-28T23:34:13.147+00:00


### Customer outcomes

| Customer | Summary | Metric |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Asana | Engineers at Asana shipped 21% more code and merged 17% more pull requests within their first 30 days on Graphite compared to the 30 days before. Median PR size shrank by 11%, and engineers saved an average of 7 hours per week. | 21% more code shipped, 7 hours/week saved per engineer |
| Ramp | Median time between PRs merged dropped from ~10 hours to ~3 hours after adopting Graphite, enabling the team to merge PRs three times faster while maintaining output quality. | 74% decrease in median time between PRs merged |
| Shopify | Shopify saw a 33% increase in PRs shipped per developer since adopting Graphite's stacked PR workflow across its monorepo, with 22% of all merged PRs now part of a stack. | 33% increase in PRs shipped per developer |



### Reviews breakdown





### Review themes



#### Praised

- Ergonomic CLI for stacked PR management
- Automated rebasing eliminates 'wrangling git' pain
- Smaller, more focused PRs improve review quality
- AI reviewer catches real bugs with low noise
- VS Code extension makes stacking visual and intuitive
- Significant time savings (hours per week per engineer)
- Seamless GitHub integration requiring minimal setup
- Active, responsive product team and community



#### Criticized

- Steep learning curve for stacking paradigm, especially for junior engineers
- GitHub-only; no GitLab or Bitbucket support
- Full AI features locked behind $40/user Team plan
- Acquisition by Cursor creates roadmap uncertainty
- Not a replacement for dedicated security or static-analysis tooling




### Company facts

Founded year: 2020
Hq: New York, NY, USA


#### Founders

- Merrill Lutsky
- Tomas Reimers
- Greg Foster

Employees range: ~100
Total funding: ~$72M
Valuation: $290M (last private round, Mar 2025; acq
Arr: Not available
Customer count: 500+ companies, tens of thousands of eng
Status: Acquired by Cursor (Dec 2025), operating independently


Readiness: Not available


## Ranking

| Display name | Pair count | Total pairs | Presence percent | Avg position |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Greptile | 21 | 150 | 14.000000000000002 | 4.04 |
| SonarSource | 19 | 150 | 12.666666666666668 | 3.076923076923077 |
| Qodo | 15 | 150 | 10 | 3.217391304347826 |
| CodeRabbit | 14 | 150 | 9.333333333333334 | 2.9642857142857144 |
| Semgrep | 9 | 150 | 6 | 2.7 |
| Codacy | 9 | 150 | 6 | 3.076923076923077 |
| Sourcegraph | 9 | 150 | 6 | 3.2777777777777777 |
| DeepSource | 6 | 150 | 4 | 4.166666666666667 |
| Snyk | 4 | 150 | 2.666666666666667 | 2.5 |
| Graphite | 1 | 150 | 0.6666666666666667 | 2 |
| Code Climate | 0 | 150 | 0 | Not available |



## Platform breakdown

| Platform | Prompt count | Presence rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| google-ai-mode | 0 | 0 |
| perplexity | 0 | 0 |
| bing-copilot-search | 0 | 0 |
| chatgpt-search | 0 | 0 |
| google-ai | 1 | 4 |
| xai-search | 0 | 0 |



## Strengths

| Prompt text | Platform count | Avg position |
| --- | --- | --- |
| What code quality platforms scale to thousands of PRs per day without degrading analysis quality or response time? | 1 | 1 |



## Gaps

| Prompt text | Competitor presence count |
| --- | --- |
| Which AI PR review platforms support self-hosted deployments that keep code on-premises and don't send source code to third-party models? | 4 |
| Looking for an AI PR review tool that learns from the codebase and past review decisions so feedback improves over time — what are my options? | 3 |
| I need a code quality tool that enforces quality gates in CI and blocks merges when coverage drops or critical issues are introduced — which platforms do this well? | 3 |
| What code quality platforms have the lowest false positive rate so developers don't spend time dismissing irrelevant warnings? | 3 |
| Which AI review tools handle very large pull requests with 500+ changed files without timing out or producing incomplete feedback? | 3 |



## Topic scores

| Topic name | Prompt count | Cited prompt count |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability | 5 | 0 |
| Developer Experience | 5 | 0 |
| Integrations & Ecosystem | 5 | 0 |
| Performance & Reliability | 5 | 1 |
| Setup & First Run | 5 | 0 |



## Prompt results

- Prompt text: What code analysis platforms have reliable CI integrations that don't cause flaky build failures due to rate limiting or API timeouts?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 1 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 1 |
| Semgrep | 2 |
| Codacy | 4 |



##### Google-ai





##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: Looking for an AI PR review tool that learns from the codebase and past review decisions so feedback improves over time — what are my options?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| CodeRabbit | 1 |
| Greptile | 4 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Greptile | 1 |
| Qodo | 2 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |



##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: Which code quality platforms can analyze a 500k-line legacy codebase and give a prioritized technical debt report without manual configuration?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search





##### Google-ai





##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: Which AI PR review tools can summarize large diffs and give an overall assessment of a pull request rather than only commenting line by line?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Qodo | 5 |
| Greptile | 7 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Qodo | 1 |
| Greptile | 2 |



##### Google-ai





##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: I need a code quality tool that enforces quality gates in CI and blocks merges when coverage drops or critical issues are introduced — which platforms do this well?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 1 |
| Codacy | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 1 |
| DeepSource | 2 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 2 |



##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: What code review tools work across both cloud-hosted and on-premises version control systems for teams with a hybrid repository strategy?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Qodo | 1 |
| CodeRabbit | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search





##### Google-ai





##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: I'm evaluating AI pull request review tools for a Python and TypeScript codebase — which ones require the least configuration to get useful feedback from day one?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| CodeRabbit | 1 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search





##### Google-ai





##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: What code quality platforms scale to thousands of PRs per day without degrading analysis quality or response time?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: 1
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 1 |
| Codacy | 3 |
| DeepSource | 5 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Codacy | 2 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Graphite | 1 |



##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: What code quality platforms have the lowest false positive rate so developers don't spend time dismissing irrelevant warnings?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 2 |
| DeepSource | 4 |
| Greptile | 6 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 1 |
| Semgrep | 2 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |



##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: Which code quality tools let teams define custom rules and guardrails specific to their architecture so the tool enforces their own conventions?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 4 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Greptile | 2 |



##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: Which AI review tools handle very large pull requests with 500+ changed files without timing out or producing incomplete feedback?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| CodeRabbit | 1 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Codacy | 2 |
| CodeRabbit | 4 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 2 |
| Greptile | 3 |



##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: Which AI code review tools maintain consistent review quality across a polyglot repository with Go, Python, and TypeScript services?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Greptile | 1 |
| CodeRabbit | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Qodo | 1 |
| CodeRabbit | 4 |
| Greptile | 5 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 4 |



##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: What AI code review tools integrate with IDE plugins so developers get the same automated feedback locally before pushing a pull request?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 3 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Qodo | 1 |
| SonarSource | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search





##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |



##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: Which AI code review tools can be added to a pull request workflow in under 30 minutes with no changes to existing CI pipelines?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Greptile | 3 |
| DeepSource | 6 |



##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Qodo | 6 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Greptile | 2 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |



##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: Which code quality platforms integrate with issue trackers to automatically create tickets for critical issues found during code review?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 1 |
| SonarSource | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 1 |
| Codacy | 2 |
| Snyk | 3 |



##### Google-ai





##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: What are the best automated code quality tools for a team of 15 engineers that wants to enforce standards without a dedicated security engineer?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 1 |
| Semgrep | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 3 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 3 |



##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: Which AI PR review platforms support self-hosted deployments that keep code on-premises and don't send source code to third-party models?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |
| CodeRabbit | 2 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| CodeRabbit | 3 |
| Greptile | 5 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Qodo | 3 |
| Greptile | 4 |
| Semgrep | 7 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Qodo | 3 |



##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: Which AI code review tools can detect security vulnerabilities and insecure coding patterns across multiple languages in the same repository?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| CodeRabbit | 1 |



##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| DeepSource | 1 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 1 |
| Snyk | 2 |
| CodeRabbit | 3 |
| Qodo | 4 |



##### Google-ai





##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: What AI code review platforms are popular with engineering leads who want to spend less time on repetitive PR feedback and more on architectural comments?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Qodo | 1 |
| Greptile | 4 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| CodeRabbit | 2 |
| Greptile | 3 |



##### Google-ai





##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: What AI code review tools can analyze infrastructure-as-code files alongside application code for a full-stack security posture review?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Qodo | 4 |
| Greptile | 5 |
| SonarSource | 6 |
| DeepSource | 7 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 2 |
| Semgrep | 3 |



##### Google-ai





##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: Which AI code review tools complete their analysis fast enough to not delay a PR workflow — which ones consistently finish within 2 minutes?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Greptile | 4 |



##### Google-ai





##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: Which AI code review tools give feedback that engineers actually find useful — not just style nitpicks but real logic and security issues?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Qodo | 3 |
| Greptile | 5 |



##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 3 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| CodeRabbit | 2 |
| Greptile | 3 |
| Qodo | 5 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 4 |



##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: Looking for a code quality tool that feeds results into a security dashboard for CISO-level reporting — which platforms have strong SIEM and security integrations?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 1 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 3 |



##### Google-ai





##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: What AI code review tools have the smoothest version control platform integration so reviews appear inline on diffs automatically on every PR?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Qodo | 4 |
| Greptile | 6 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| CodeRabbit | 1 |
| Greptile | 4 |



##### Google-ai





##### Xai-search




- Prompt text: What code quality platforms track technical debt trends over time and show whether the team is paying it down or accumulating more?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 1 |
| Codacy | 5 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 1 |
| Codacy | 2 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Codacy | 1 |



##### Xai-search







## Top sources

| Url | Title | Domain | Logo url | Source vertical | Content type | Citation count | Last30d count |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| https://graphite.com/guides/ai-code-review-tools-enterprise-startups | AI code review tools for Enterprise vs. startups - Graphite | graphite.com | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/cdac0d71-a73b-4985-abfa-c782edd883da/884a1fd7d1255434f03de55b3c518023addecd0a.png | commercial | comparison | 3 | 3 |



## Response excerpts

| Prompt text | Platform | Excerpt |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Which AI PR review tools can summarize large diffs and give an overall assessment of a pull request rather than only commenting line by line? | perplexity | Graphite Agent: adds PR summaries and actionable feedback on pull requests, layered into a larger PR workflow tool [10]. |
| Looking for an AI PR review tool that learns from the codebase and past review decisions so feedback improves over time — what are my options? | chatgpt-search | ...ss explicitly about automatically mining reviewer decisions \| General-purpose PR review with a polished workflow \| \| Graphite \| Codebase/PR context \| More workflow/rules oriented than “learn continuously from reviewer decisions” \| Teams already u... |
| Which AI PR review tools can summarize large diffs and give an overall assessment of a pull request rather than only commenting line by line? | chatgpt-search | ...Greptile \| Strong \| Strong \| Very strong whole-codebase context \| Cross-file/architectural review \| \| Graphite Agent \| Strong \| Good \| More PR/diff-oriented \| Teams already using stacked PRs \| \| GitHub Copilot Code Review \|... |



## Competitor excerpts

| Platform | Competitor name | Excerpt |
| --- | --- | --- |
| google-ai-mode | Sourcegraph | Sourcegraph * CodeRabbit IDE Extension : Available for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and JetBrains-based environments. |
| google-ai-mode | CodeRabbit | CodeRabbit IDE Extension : Available for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and JetBrains-based environments. |
| perplexity | CodeRabbit | ...nd self-hostable \| Can be configured with locally deployed LLMs, making it suitable for air-gapped environments [2] \| \| CodeRabbit Self-Hosted \| Enterprise/container deployment in your infrastructure \| The application and Git integration stay inside... |
| chatgpt-search | Qodo | \[1\] \| \| PR-Agent \| Yes \| Yes via LiteLLM/local models \| Yes \| Open-source Qodo project; when self-hosted, code goes directly to the LLM provider you configure, not Qodo. |
| google-ai | Qodo | Enterprise Platforms with On-Premises / Single-Tenant Options (e.g., Qodo / CodiumAI) * How it works: Commercial AI review tools like Qodo offer explicit enterprise-grade deployment models, including on-premises or single-tenant options d... |
| perplexity | CodeRabbit | ...te your team’s review preferences over time, the strongest options I found are: \| Tool \| How it learns \| Best fit \| \|---\|---\|---\| \| CodeRabbit \| Builds context from the codebase, dependencies, history, past PRs, coding guidelines, and linked issues. |
| chatgpt-search | Greptile | ...\| Tool \| Codebase context \| Learns from review history/feedback \| Best fit \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| Greptile \| Full repo graph, including dependencies \| Yes — explicitly learns from reactions, tags, merged code, and PR co... |
| chatgpt-search | Qodo | ...tly learns from reactions, tags, merged code, and PR comments \| Teams wanting deep architectural/contextual review \| \| Qodo \| Full/cross-repo context \| Yes — its Rules Miner turns recurring PR comments and reviewer decisions into enforcea... |
| google-ai | Sourcegraph | Sourcegraph ### Top AI PR Review Tools with Codebase Context & Adaptation \| Tool \| How it Learns / Adapts \| Best For \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| CodeRabbit \| Features repository-level "Learnings" and config orchestration that adjust future feedba... |
| perplexity | Codacy | [1][2] \| \| Codacy \| Best for straightforward coverage and issue gates \| Supports gates for newly introduced issues by severity, security issues, coverage variation, and diff coverage. |
| chatgpt-search | DeepSource | ...--- \| --- \| \| SonarQube \| Yes \| Yes \| GitHub/GitLab/Azure DevOps + CI \| Broad, mature quality gates \| \| DeepSource \| Yes \| Yes \| GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket/Azure DevOps \| Modern PR-centric workflow \| \| Qodana \| Yes \|... |
| chatgpt-search | Semgrep | ...“developers should rarely have to dismiss irrelevant warnings,” the strongest options I’d investigate are SonarQube and Semgrep, with an important caveat: there is no reliable, apples-to-apples industry benchmark covering the overall false-positive... |



## Trend

Visibility delta: -1.4476190476190474
Avg position delta: -0.6666666666666665
Citation count delta: 0