# Sourcegraph AI visibility in Version Control & Code Collaboration

Canonical: https://devtune.ai/verticals/version-control-code-collaboration/sourcegraph

[Website](https://sourcegraph.com/)

Updated: 2026-10-15T19:38:54.534914+00:00
Prompts: 25
Runs: 6


## Platforms

- google-ai
- chatgpt-search
- perplexity
- bing-copilot-search
- google-ai-mode
- xai-search

Rank: 5
Total brands: 7
Measured responses: 150
Presence percent: 10.666666666666668
Share of voice percent: 5.847953216374268
Average position: 9.025
Docs presence percent: 1.3333333333333335
Blog presence percent: 9.333333333333334
Brand mention percent: 10.666666666666668


## Profile

Overview: Sourcegraph is a San Francisco-based code intelligence platform founded in 2013 by Quinn Slack and Beyang Liu. Designed to address 'Big Code'—the challenge of managing large, complex, multi-repository codebases—Sourcegraph provides enterprise engineering teams and AI agents with unified search, navigation, and understanding across all code regardless of host. Core capabilities include exhaustive cross-repository Code Search, agentic Deep Search, Batch Changes for large-scale automated edits, Code Insights for analytics, Code Monitoring, and an MCP server for AI agent context. The company also launched Amp, an independent AI coding agent, in 2025. Trusted by 200+ enterprise teams including Stripe, Reddit, BlackRock, and Nutanix, Sourcegraph has indexed over 54 billion lines of code. It has raised $223M at a $2.6B valuation (Series D, 2021).
Product summary: Sourcegraph is a code intelligence platform that indexes all of an organization's repositories across every code host, enabling developers and AI agents to search, understand, and evolve large, complex codebases. Its platform spans universal code search (exact, regex, structural, and diff search), semantic code navigation, agentic natural-language Deep Search, automated large-scale Batch Changes, Code Insights dashboards, real-time Code Monitoring, and an MCP server that feeds codebase context to external coding agents. Cody, an AI coding assistant, remains available for enterprise customers. The platform is deployed as single-tenant cloud or self-hosted and is built for enterprise security and scale with SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and SSO/SCIM support.


### Key capabilities

- Universal cross-repository, cross-host code search (regex, structural, literal, diff, commit)
- Deep Search: agentic natural-language queries with cited, grounded answers across the codebase
- SCIP-powered semantic code navigation (jump-to-definition, find references, hover docs) across 30+ languages
- Batch Changes: automated large-scale code modifications across all repositories via declarative specs
- Code Insights: queryable dashboards tracking migrations, dependency versions, vulnerability remediation, and code trends over time
- Code Monitoring: real-time alerts to Slack, PagerDuty, Jira, or webhooks when code patterns change
- MCP server for supplying full codebase context to external AI coding agents
- Living Documentation: auto-generated, continuously updated knowledge base from the codebase
- SOC 2 Type II + ISO 27001 compliance with zero LLM data retention and RBAC/SCIM for enterprise security



### Target users

- Enterprise software engineering teams managing large, multi-repository codebases
- Platform and developer experience (DevEx) engineering teams
- Engineering leaders and CTOs tracking codebase health, migrations, and technical debt
- Security and compliance engineers performing vulnerability remediation at scale
- Developers onboarding to unfamiliar or inherited codebases
- AI/ML platform teams integrating coding agents that require full codebase context



### Key use cases

- Cross-repository code search and navigation in large, multi-host enterprise codebases
- Security vulnerability identification and remediation at scale (e.g., Log4j, CVE sweeps)
- Large-scale refactoring, migrations, and dependency upgrades across hundreds of repositories
- Developer onboarding and codebase comprehension acceleration
- Incident response: locating root-cause code and error-message origins across all services
- Providing full codebase context to AI coding agents and LLM-based workflows via MCP
- Engineering analytics: tracking migration progress, tech debt, and adoption metrics
- Compliance and audit: monitoring code changes for security and regulatory patterns

Integrations ecosystem: Sourcegraph integrates with all major code hosts: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Phabricator, enabling cross-host indexing in a single interface. Browser extensions (Chrome, Safari, Firefox) add code navigation—jump-to-definition, find-references, hover tooltips—directly within code host UIs and code review tools including GitHub Pull Requests, GitLab Merge Requests, and Phabricator. IDE integrations cover VS Code and JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ, PyCharm, WebStorm, Rider, GoLand). Third-party tool integrations include Codecov (code coverage), Jira Software (project management), Sentry (error tracking), Datadog, and PagerDuty via extension APIs. An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server exposes SCIP-powered code graph context to external AI coding agents. GraphQL and REST APIs plus webhooks allow custom integrations. SSO via SAML, OpenID Connect, and OAuth is supported, along with SCIM provisioning for enterprise identity management.
Pricing summary: Sourcegraph's primary commercial offering is Enterprise Search at $49 per user per month (single-tenant cloud, billed annually), covering Code Search, Deep Search, Batch Changes, Code Insights, Code Navigation, Code Monitoring, and 24×5 support with optional premium tiers. An Enterprise Starter plan at $19/user/month (up to 50 developers, up to 100 repositories) was introduced in early 2025 but had Cody features removed from it by June 2025 following the discontinuation of Cody Free/Pro plans. Self-hosted (on-premises) enterprise pricing is negotiated based on user count and required features. Deep Search usage is included at 3 queries/user/month for Code Search seats, with additional usage charged incrementally. Amp, spun out as a separate entity, uses a credit-based pricing model. Observed Vendr transaction values range from ~$15K/year for small teams to $250K+/year for large enterprise deployments.
Review summary: User sentiment toward Sourcegraph is generally positive for its core code search capability, which is widely praised as exhaustive, fast, and reliable across large multi-repository environments—a key differentiator versus native GitHub or GitLab search. Enterprise customers highlight the value for security vulnerability remediation, large-scale refactors, and developer onboarding. Criticisms center on high pricing relative to native alternatives, product strategy volatility (multiple pivots over 2022–2024 noted by both users and employees), the 2023–2024 transition away from open source, and the discontinuation of lower-tier Cody plans in 2025. Internal Glassdoor and Blind reviews reflect organizational challenges and leadership churn, though technical quality of the core product is consistently respected.
Competitive positioning: Sourcegraph occupies a distinct niche as a code intelligence and universal code search layer that sits atop existing version control systems rather than replacing them. Unlike GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket—which bundle code search within a broader SCM and DevOps platform—Sourcegraph is purpose-built to index, search, and understand code across all code hosts simultaneously. Its differentiator is 'Big Code' capability: exhaustive, cross-repository, multi-host search with SCIP-powered semantic indexing that rivals native GitHub or GitLab search at orders of magnitude larger scale. In the AI era, Sourcegraph's MCP server and Deep Search position it as a codebase-context layer for coding agents, competing indirectly with GitHub Copilot's context features but in a host-agnostic, enterprise-grade way. The 2025 spin-off of Amp as an independent AI coding agent company narrows Sourcegraph's focus purely to code understanding, oversight, and codebase evolution.
Limitations: Source code was relicensed from Apache 2.0 to a proprietary enterprise license in 2023 and made fully private in August 2024, removing community transparency and hackability. Cody Free, Cody Pro, and Enterprise Starter plans were discontinued effective July 2025, narrowing self-serve access. Pricing is enterprise-oriented and can be cost-prohibitive for small teams compared to native code search in GitHub or GitLab. Self-hosted deployments require significant infrastructure and ongoing engineering overhead. The 2025 spin-off of Amp as a separate company introduced organizational uncertainty. Multiple employee reviews cite a pattern of strategic pivots and leadership churn, which has affected product consistency. Native integrations do not extend to all code hosts; some require workarounds using the Src-srv-git API.


### Source urls

- https://sourcegraph.com/
- https://sourcegraph.com/pricing
- https://sourcegraph.com/case-studies
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sourcegraph
- https://sourcegraph.com/blog/announcing-sourcegraphs-series-d-round
- https://tracxn.com/d/companies/sourcegraph/__VKOX0-AKdgV8MrEkAWvpxYcwQPfPjxyEjHJQ8TbiBCU
- https://sourcegraph.com/case-studies/nutanix-fixed-log4j-with-sourcegraph
- https://sourcegraph.com/case-studies/workiva-automates-large-scale-code-changes
- https://sourcegraph.com/blog/changes-to-cody-free-pro-and-enterprise-starter-plans
- https://getlatka.com/companies/sourcegraph
- https://www.vendr.com/marketplace/sourcegraph
- https://sourcegraph.com/blog/introducing-sourcegraph-enterprise-starter

Reviewed at: 2026-04-28T23:21:17.119+00:00


### Customer outcomes

| Customer | Summary | Metric |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Nutanix | Used Sourcegraph to identify every instance of the Log4j vulnerability across a sprawling multi-system codebase and delivered customer patches within four days of the disclosure. | 4 days to full customer patch delivery; 100% of Log4j instances identified; individual fix queries completed in under 5 |
| Workiva | Replaced an internally maintained automation tool with Sourcegraph Batch Changes to propagate large-scale code changes across 70+ repositories, including React upgrades, Kubernetes API version updates, and CDN migrations. | 80% reduction in time for large-scale code changes |
| Palo Alto Networks | Deployed Sourcegraph in a secure environment alongside AWS and Anthropic AI services to boost developer productivity for a team of 2,000 engineers. | Up to 40% developer productivity increase for 2,000 developers |
| Quantcast | Used Sourcegraph's multi-repository code search to analyze thousands of repositories for GDPR compliance refactoring, a task that would have taken months if done manually per repository. | Task that would have taken months completed in days by a single engineer |
| Stripe | Connected Sourcegraph's MCP server to Stripe's internal 'Minions' AI coding agents to supply code intelligence context, enabling agents to gather internal docs, ticket details, build statuses, and code context in a single pipeline. | Not available |



### Reviews breakdown





### Review themes



#### Praised

- Exhaustive, deterministic cross-repository code search
- Powerful regex and structural search syntax
- Effective for security vulnerability sweeps across large codebases
- Significant time savings for large-scale refactors via Batch Changes
- Faster developer onboarding in complex codebases
- Strong enterprise security and compliance posture (SOC 2, ISO 27001)
- MCP server enabling AI agent codebase context



#### Criticized

- High per-user pricing compared to native GitHub or GitLab search
- Discontinuation of Cody Free, Pro, and Enterprise Starter plans in 2025
- Source code made private in 2024, removing open-source transparency
- Frequent strategic pivots creating product inconsistency
- Self-hosted deployment complexity and maintenance overhead
- Leadership churn and organizational instability noted by employees
- Limited native integration with non-GitHub/GitLab code hosts




### Company facts

Founded year: 2013
Hq: San Francisco, CA, USA


#### Founders

- Quinn Slack
- Beyang Liu

Employees range: 150-200
Total funding: $223M
Valuation: $2.6B
Arr: ~$50M
Customer count: 200+ enterprise engineering teams
Status: Private


Readiness: Not available


## Ranking

| Display name | Pair count | Total pairs | Presence percent | Avg position |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GitHub | 82 | 150 | 54.666666666666664 | 20.25825825825826 |
| GitLab | 71 | 150 | 47.333333333333336 | 17.20689655172414 |
| Bitbucket | 32 | 150 | 21.333333333333336 | 26.933333333333334 |
| Azure DevOps | 21 | 150 | 14.000000000000002 | 23.2 |
| Sourcegraph | 16 | 150 | 10.666666666666668 | 9.025 |
| Gitea | 8 | 150 | 5.333333333333334 | 28.916666666666668 |
| Graphite | 1 | 150 | 0.6666666666666667 | 49 |



## Platform breakdown

| Platform | Prompt count | Presence rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| google-ai | 4 | 16 |
| chatgpt-search | 2 | 8 |
| perplexity | 1 | 4 |
| bing-copilot-search | 2 | 8 |
| google-ai-mode | 4 | 16 |
| xai-search | 3 | 12 |



## Strengths

| Prompt text | Platform count | Avg position |
| --- | --- | --- |
| What are the best tools for cross-repository code search at scale — finding all usages of a deprecated function across 300 repos instantly? | 6 | 1 |
| Which code review tools offer the most useful AI suggestions — which platforms surface actionable feedback rather than just adding noise for reviewers? | 2 | 1.5 |
| What monorepo tooling should a 50-person engineering team evaluate — which platforms best support monorepo, polyrepo, or hybrid repository structures? | 3 | 3 |



## Gaps

| Prompt text | Competitor presence count |
| --- | --- |
| Which hosted Git platforms have the best disaster recovery and geo-redundancy — how long until push and pull are restored after a datacenter failure? | 6 |
| Which code collaboration platforms integrate best with secrets scanning and security scanning tools to block vulnerable code before it merges? | 5 |
| Which Git platforms offer the best partial clone and sparse checkout support for teams who can't clone an entire massive monorepo locally? | 5 |
| What tools help large engineering teams manage code ownership so the right reviewers are auto-assigned without spamming everyone? | 5 |
| Which enterprise Git platforms offer the most flexible access control — which ones support read-only contractor access to specific repos without a full seat license? | 5 |



## Topic scores

| Topic name | Prompt count | Cited prompt count |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability | 5 | 2 |
| Developer Experience | 5 | 3 |
| Integrations & Ecosystem | 5 | 0 |
| Performance & Reliability | 5 | 0 |
| Setup & First Run | 5 | 1 |



## Prompt results

- Prompt text: Which self-hosted Git platforms are best for enterprises with strict data residency requirements — is the operational overhead worth it compared to managed options?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 4 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 2 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 5 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 4 |
| Gitea | 17 |
| GitLab | 26 |
| Bitbucket | 32 |


- Prompt text: What tooling helps reduce merge conflicts in a monorepo where dozens of engineers are committing to overlapping areas simultaneously?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: 1
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: 40



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |



##### Perplexity





##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 26 |
| Sourcegraph | 40 |
| Graphite | 49 |


- Prompt text: Which code review platforms have the best CI/CD pipeline integrations for making failed checks automatically block merges?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 2 |
| Azure DevOps | 3 |
| Bitbucket | 11 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 2 |
| Bitbucket | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Bitbucket | 4 |
| GitHub | 22 |
| GitLab | 30 |


- Prompt text: Which enterprise code collaboration platforms offer the best SAML/SSO and SCIM provisioning support for automated user lifecycle management?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 4 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 5 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 21 |


- Prompt text: Which Git platforms offer the best clone and fetch performance for large repositories — how do cloud-hosted and self-hosted options compare?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| Azure DevOps | 2 |
| GitLab | 3 |
| Bitbucket | 17 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 6 |



##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 7 |



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 11 |
| Bitbucket | 15 |
| GitLab | 22 |
| Gitea | 62 |


- Prompt text: Which code collaboration platforms integrate most deeply with project management tools — which ones can automatically move a ticket to in-review when a commit references it?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 4 |
| GitHub | 6 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 3 |
| Azure DevOps | 5 |
| Bitbucket | 6 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 3 |
| GitHub | 4 |
| Bitbucket | 5 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 7 |
| Bitbucket | 8 |
| GitLab | 12 |
| Azure DevOps | 40 |


- Prompt text: What engineering metrics platforms give managers visibility into cycle time and review turnaround without micromanaging the team?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: 12



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search





##### Perplexity





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 4 |
| Sourcegraph | 12 |


- Prompt text: What are the best code collaboration platforms for onboarding a remote team of 20 engineers with minimal disruption to active sprints?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |
| Bitbucket | 5 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |
| Bitbucket | 4 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Bitbucket | 37 |
| GitHub | 45 |
| GitLab | 63 |
| Azure DevOps | 68 |


- Prompt text: Which code collaboration platforms integrate best with secrets scanning and security scanning tools to block vulnerable code before it merges?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 4 |
| Azure DevOps | 9 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 3 |
| GitLab | 6 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| Azure DevOps | 4 |
| GitLab | 29 |
| Bitbucket | 58 |


- Prompt text: Which code collaboration platforms offer the best enterprise SLAs and availability during planned maintenance — what should teams compare?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 3 |
| GitLab | 7 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 2 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 4 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 2 |
| Bitbucket | 26 |
| GitLab | 36 |
| Azure DevOps | 51 |


- Prompt text: Which code collaboration platforms handle large binary files and machine learning model artifacts best alongside source code in the same repo?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 3 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 2 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Bitbucket | 9 |
| GitHub | 23 |
| Azure DevOps | 40 |
| GitLab | 49 |


- Prompt text: Which code collaboration platforms make it easiest to set up branch protection rules and merge policies from day one for a growing engineering team?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 4 |



##### Chatgpt-search





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 4 |
| Bitbucket | 7 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 2 |
| GitHub | 3 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 11 |
| Azure DevOps | 41 |
| Bitbucket | 63 |


- Prompt text: Which tooling makes stacked pull request workflows less painful to manage in practice — what do teams actually use for this?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 4 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 4 |



##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 3 |



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 2 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 13 |


- Prompt text: What monorepo tooling should a 50-person engineering team evaluate — which platforms best support monorepo, polyrepo, or hybrid repository structures?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: 2
Chatgpt-search: 3
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: 4
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 2 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 3 |
| GitHub | 9 |
| GitLab | 10 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 8 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 4 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 8 |
| Bitbucket | 25 |


- Prompt text: Which Git platforms offer the best partial clone and sparse checkout support for teams who can't clone an entire massive monorepo locally?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| Azure DevOps | 3 |
| GitLab | 5 |
| Bitbucket | 10 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 4 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |
| Azure DevOps | 18 |
| Bitbucket | 54 |


- Prompt text: Which code review tools offer the most useful AI suggestions — which platforms surface actionable feedback rather than just adding noise for reviewers?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: 1
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: 2
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 6 |



##### Perplexity





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 2 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 17 |


- Prompt text: What are the best tools for cross-repository code search at scale — finding all usages of a deprecated function across 300 repos instantly?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: 1
Chatgpt-search: 1
Perplexity: 1
Bing-copilot-search: 1
Google-ai-mode: 1
Xai-search: 1



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |
| GitHub | 4 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |
| GitHub | 5 |



##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |
| GitHub | 2 |
| GitLab | 33 |


- Prompt text: What tools make it easiest to migrate a 10-year-old SVN repository to Git without losing commit history or tags?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 5 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Azure DevOps | 13 |
| Bitbucket | 22 |


- Prompt text: Which hosted Git platforms have the best disaster recovery and geo-redundancy — how long until push and pull are restored after a datacenter failure?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| Azure DevOps | 4 |
| GitHub | 7 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |



##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 2 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 11 |
| Bitbucket | 72 |


- Prompt text: Which code review platforms are best at keeping review workflows fast and avoiding multi-day bottlenecks — what features actually make the difference?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: 2
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: 3
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 2 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 3 |
| GitLab | 7 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 3 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Bitbucket | 1 |
| GitHub | 29 |


- Prompt text: Which Git platforms offer the best webhook and API support for building internal developer tooling on top of repo events?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Gitea | 2 |
| GitHub | 4 |
| GitLab | 13 |
| Azure DevOps | 31 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |
| Azure DevOps | 6 |
| Bitbucket | 7 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| Gitea | 2 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 11 |
| Gitea | 50 |
| Bitbucket | 59 |


- Prompt text: What tools help large engineering teams manage code ownership so the right reviewers are auto-assigned without spamming everyone?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 2 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 2 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Bitbucket | 3 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| Bitbucket | 15 |
| GitLab | 22 |


- Prompt text: Which platforms offer the best pull request automation — auto-merging, required checks, dependency updates — without introducing excessive risk?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 4 |
| Bitbucket | 7 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 3 |
| Bitbucket | 40 |
| GitLab | 55 |


- Prompt text: Which Git hosting platforms handle massive monorepos best — which ones stay performant when a repo grows to millions of files and hundreds of thousands of commits?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 2 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 3 |
| Azure DevOps | 8 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| Azure DevOps | 2 |
| GitHub | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 2 |
| GitHub | 5 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 13 |
| Bitbucket | 27 |
| GitLab | 37 |
| Gitea | 45 |


- Prompt text: Which enterprise Git platforms offer the most flexible access control — which ones support read-only contractor access to specific repos without a full seat license?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 2 |
| Bitbucket | 7 |
| Azure DevOps | 9 |
| Gitea | 11 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Bitbucket | 1 |
| GitHub | 3 |
| GitLab | 5 |
| Azure DevOps | 6 |
| Gitea | 8 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 4 |
| Azure DevOps | 46 |





## Top sources

| Url | Title | Domain | Logo url | Source vertical | Content type | Citation count | Last30d count |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| https://sourcegraph.com/blog/monorepo-build-tools | Best Monorepo Build Tools for Engineering Teams (2026) \| Sourcegraph | sourcegraph.com | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/3b85de80-82a1-4ef6-a126-ddcca4320279/e9642de70e8a11b8d8d889a5de54d2a61bda752e.png | commercial | blog_post | 16 | 16 |
| https://sourcegraph.com/blog/multi-repo-search-how-to-search-across-multiple-repositories | Multi-repo search: How to search across multiple repositories \| Sourcegraph | sourcegraph.com | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/3b85de80-82a1-4ef6-a126-ddcca4320279/e9642de70e8a11b8d8d889a5de54d2a61bda752e.png | commercial | blog_post | 11 | 11 |
| https://sourcegraph.com/blog/automated-code-review-tools | 13 Best Automated Code Review Tools in 2026: AI and Static Analysis Compared \| Sourcegraph | sourcegraph.com | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/3b85de80-82a1-4ef6-a126-ddcca4320279/e9642de70e8a11b8d8d889a5de54d2a61bda752e.png | commercial | blog_post | 9 | 9 |
| https://sourcegraph.com/blog/best-source-code-tools-large-codebases | 10 Best Source Code Tools for Large Codebases (2026) \| Sourcegraph | sourcegraph.com | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/3b85de80-82a1-4ef6-a126-ddcca4320279/e9642de70e8a11b8d8d889a5de54d2a61bda752e.png | commercial | blog_post | 5 | 5 |
| https://sourcegraph.com/code-search | Code Search \| Sourcegraph | sourcegraph.com | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/3b85de80-82a1-4ef6-a126-ddcca4320279/e9642de70e8a11b8d8d889a5de54d2a61bda752e.png | commercial | blog_post | 5 | 5 |
| https://sourcegraph.com/docs/code-search | Code Search | sourcegraph.com | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/3b85de80-82a1-4ef6-a126-ddcca4320279/e9642de70e8a11b8d8d889a5de54d2a61bda752e.png | commercial | blog_post | 3 | 3 |
| https://sourcegraph.com/docs/code-search/queries | Search Query Syntax - Sourcegraph docs | sourcegraph.com | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/3b85de80-82a1-4ef6-a126-ddcca4320279/e9642de70e8a11b8d8d889a5de54d2a61bda752e.png | commercial | blog_post | 3 | 3 |
| https://sourcegraph.com/blog/cross-repository-code-navigation | Cross-repository code navigation \| Sourcegraph | sourcegraph.com | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/3b85de80-82a1-4ef6-a126-ddcca4320279/e9642de70e8a11b8d8d889a5de54d2a61bda752e.png | commercial | blog_post | 3 | 3 |



## Response excerpts

| Prompt text | Platform | Excerpt |
| --- | --- | --- |
| What are the best tools for cross-repository code search at scale — finding all usages of a deprecated function across 300 repos instantly? | bing-copilot-search | The best tools for instantly finding all usages of a deprecated function across 300+ repositories are Sourcegraph, Zoekt, and GitHub’s new Code Search. |
| What tooling helps reduce merge conflicts in a monorepo where dozens of engineers are committing to overlapping areas simultaneously? | bing-copilot-search | ...and prevents conflicts from cascading across unrelated modules.Best Monorepo Build Tools for Engineering Teams (2026) \| Sourcegraph * Nx, Turborepo, Rush: JavaScript/TypeScript-focused platform... |
| What are the best code collaboration platforms for onboarding a remote team of 20 engineers with minimal disruption to active sprints? | bing-copilot-search | ...tegrated boards, pipelines\| Teams in Microsoft ecosystem\| ~$6/user/month Basic Plan\| Complex setup; less intuitive UI Sourcegraph \+ Reviewable [Top 10 Best Code Collaboration Software \| Ranked for 2026](https://worldmetrics.org/best/code-collabora... |



## Competitor excerpts

| Platform | Competitor name | Excerpt |
| --- | --- | --- |
| google-ai | GitLab | When comparing the major enterprise hosted Git platforms ( GitHub , GitLab , and Bitbucket Cloud ) regarding disaster recovery, geo-redundancy, and restoration times, performance depends heavily on whether you are using multi-tenant cloud Saa... |
| chatgpt-search | GitLab | \| Platform \| Geo-redundancy and recovery evidence \| Published recovery target \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| GitLab Dedicated \| Optional secondary region with continuous replication of databases, repositories, and object storage. |
| perplexity | GitLab | \| Platform / offering \| What the published information says \| What that means for push/pull recovery \| \|---\|---\|---\| \| GitLab Dedicated with a secondary region \| GitLab states an RTO of eight hours or less for restoration to the secondary region. |
| bing-copilot-search | GitLab | GitLab Dedicated\| Primary \+ secondary AWS region with continuous Geo replication\| ≤ 8 hours\| ≤ 4 hours\| Automated backups every 4 hours; continuous replication of repos, DB, and object storage.[Disaster recovery for GitLab Dedicated and GitLab De... |
| google-ai-mode | GitLab | GitHub and GitLab (via GitLab Dedicated/Geo) provide the most robust enterprise disaster recovery and geo-redundancy, with automated or managed failovers restoring push and pull operations typically within minutes to under 8 hours (RTO), depending on t... |
| google-ai-mode | GitHub | GitHub and GitLab (via GitLab Dedicated/Geo) provide the most robust enterprise disaster recovery and geo-redundancy, with automated or managed failovers restoring push and pull operations typically within minutes to under 8 hours (RTO), depending on t... |
| google-ai | GitLab | GitLab Docs * Code Scanning (SAST): Powered by CodeQL , GitHub scans code on every pull request. |
| chatgpt-search | GitHub | If your goal is to block secrets, vulnerable dependencies, and insecure code before a pull request or merge is approved, the strongest platforms are generally GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, with Azure DevOps also a strong choice for Microsoft-centric teams. |
| perplexity | GitHub | GitHub and GitLab are the strongest choices if you want security scanning enforced as part of the platform’s merge workflow. Bitbucket can do this well too, especially with a scanner such as Snyk, but its enforcement depends more on integrations and... |
| perplexity | GitLab | GitHub and GitLab are the strongest choices if you want security scanning enforced as part of the platform’s merge workflow. Bitbucket can do this well too, especially with a scanner such as Snyk, but its enforcement depends more on integrations and... |
| google-ai-mode | GitHub | When it comes to blocking vulnerable code and exposed secrets _before_ it gets merged into production, the market is led by two primary all-in-one platforms with native, deeply integrated "shift-left" security: GitHub and GitLab. |
| google-ai | GitLab | GitLab (Best for Integrated CI/CD Monorepo Controls) GitLab handles partial clones and sparse checkouts well through its Gitaly storage layer, but historically required specific server configuration flags or feature flags on self-managed instances (tho... |



## Trend

Visibility delta: 4.4
Avg position delta: 1.1931818181818183
Citation count delta: 21