# Gitea AI visibility in Version Control & Code Collaboration

Canonical: https://devtune.ai/verticals/version-control-code-collaboration/gitea

[Website](https://gitea.com/)

Updated: 2026-10-15T19:38:54.534914+00:00
Prompts: 25
Runs: 6


## Platforms

- google-ai
- chatgpt-search
- perplexity
- bing-copilot-search
- google-ai-mode
- xai-search

Rank: 6
Total brands: 7
Measured responses: 150
Presence percent: 5.333333333333334
Share of voice percent: 1.7543859649122806
Average position: 28.916666666666668
Docs presence percent: 4.666666666666667
Blog presence percent: 0
Brand mention percent: 17.333333333333336


## Profile

Overview: Gitea is an open-source, self-hosted all-in-one software development platform forked from Gogs in November 2016, written in Go and TypeScript, and released under the MIT license. It provides Git repository hosting, pull request-based code review, built-in CI/CD via Gitea Actions (compatible with GitHub Actions YAML), a multi-format package registry, issue tracking, and kanban project management. The open-source binary is free with unlimited users and repositories. Commercial tiers—Gitea Enterprise and Gitea Cloud—are operated by CommitGo, Inc., founded by project maintainers Lunny Xiao and Matti Ranta, adding SAML SSO, audit logs, and SLA-backed support. Gitea runs across Linux, macOS, Windows, FreeBSD, and ARM architectures, suiting resource-constrained or air-gapped deployments.
Product summary: Gitea is a lightweight, MIT-licensed, self-hosted DevOps platform providing Git repository hosting, pull request code review, GitHub Actions-compatible CI/CD (Gitea Actions), a 20+ format package registry, and kanban project management. It is available as a free self-hosted binary or as commercial Gitea Enterprise and Gitea Cloud offerings through CommitGo, Inc., with 54,900+ GitHub stars and an active global contributor community.


### Key capabilities

- Self-hosted Git repository hosting with branch, tag, release, and Git LFS management
- Pull request and AGit-based code review workflows
- Gitea Actions CI/CD system compatible with GitHub Actions YAML syntax and 20,000+ plugins
- Built-in package registry supporting 20+ formats (npm, Maven, PyPI, OCI/Docker, Helm, Cargo, etc.)
- Issue tracking, kanban boards, milestones, time tracking, and project management
- Multi-platform deployment (Linux, macOS, Windows, FreeBSD, ARM, x86, PowerPC)
- Multiple database backends (SQLite, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MS SQL, TiDB)
- SAML SSO and audit logs (Enterprise tier)
- Kubernetes autoscaling runners (Enterprise tier)
- REST API and webhooks for custom workflow automation



### Target users

- Individual developers seeking self-hosted Git with full data control
- Small-to-medium engineering teams prioritizing privacy and on-premise infrastructure
- Organizations in regulated industries requiring air-gapped or on-premise DevOps
- DevOps and platform engineers building internal developer tooling
- Open-source project maintainers needing MIT-licensed hosting infrastructure
- Teams migrating from cloud-hosted Git platforms for cost, compliance, or sovereignty reasons



### Key use cases

- Self-hosted, on-premise Git source code management
- Privacy-controlled DevOps for regulated industries or air-gapped environments
- CI/CD automation reusing existing GitHub Actions workflows
- Private artifact hosting via internal package registry
- Lightweight Git hosting on resource-constrained infrastructure (e.g., Raspberry Pi)
- Internal developer platform for teams migrating away from cloud-hosted Git services
- Open-source project hosting with full MIT-licensed data control

Integrations ecosystem: Gitea integrates natively with chat platforms including Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, and Lark via webhooks. Supported CI/CD integrations include Gitea Actions (built-in, GitHub Actions YAML-compatible), Drone, Woodpecker, ArgoCD, and Jenkins. The Gitea Actions system can reuse 20,000+ existing GitHub Actions plugins. The built-in package registry supports 20+ formats including Cargo, Chef, Composer, Conan, Conda, Container (OCI), Helm, Maven, npm, NuGet, Pub, PyPI, RubyGems, and Vagrant. A full REST API and webhook system enables custom integrations. The community-maintained Awesome Gitea list catalogs third-party SDKs, plugins, themes, and tools. Official tooling includes the Tea CLI and a Go SDK.
Pricing summary: Open Source (self-managed): Free under MIT license, unlimited users and repositories, community support only. Enterprise (self-managed, via CommitGo): $9.50/user/month with a 1-year commitment ($19/user/month without annual commitment); includes SAML SSO, audit logs, Kubernetes autoscaling runners, priority security notifications, priority email/online support with SLA, installation/upgrade assistant, and emergency remote support. Discounts available for non-profits and small companies. Gitea Cloud (managed, via CommitGo): starting at $9.50/seat/month per G2 pricing data; 30-day free trial available.
Review summary: Gitea earns a 4.7/5 rating from 17 verified reviews on G2. Users consistently praise its lightweight design, ease of installation, intuitive interface, and full self-hosting control. Frequently cited criticisms include limited enterprise-grade features in the free tier, the need for Linux server knowledge for setup and maintenance, potential resource heaviness on underpowered hardware for large codebases, and less community or commercial support depth compared to GitHub or GitLab.
Competitive positioning: Gitea positions itself as a lightweight, privacy-first, MIT-licensed self-hosted DevOps platform. Against GitHub and GitLab it emphasizes full data ownership, minimal resource requirements, and no vendor lock-in. Against GitLab CE it highlights simpler deployment and lower operational overhead. Commercial tiers (Gitea Enterprise and Gitea Cloud, operated by CommitGo, Inc.) add SAML SSO, audit logs, Kubernetes autoscaling runners, and SLA-backed support for organizations with compliance requirements. A community fork, Forgejo, emerged in 2022 in reaction to the formation of the commercial Gitea Limited entity, introducing governance uncertainty for some users.
Limitations: Enterprise-grade features (SAML SSO, audit logs, Kubernetes autoscaling runners, SLA support) are gated behind paid CommitGo tiers. Self-managed deployment requires Linux and server administration knowledge. Users report slowness for very large codebases on underpowered hardware. The 2022–2023 formation of Gitea Limited and CommitGo prompted a community fork (Forgejo) amid transparency concerns around governance and open-core direction, creating ecosystem fragmentation. The G2 review corpus (17 reviews) is significantly smaller than GitHub or GitLab, limiting review-based signal. Documentation for advanced configurations is noted as limited by some users.


### Source urls

- https://about.gitea.com/
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea
- https://docs.gitea.com/
- https://about.gitea.com/pricing
- https://www.g2.com/products/gitea/reviews
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gitea
- https://blog.gitea.com/gitea-enterprise/

Reviewed at: 2026-04-28T23:21:49.051+00:00


### Customer outcomes





### Reviews breakdown

| Platform | Score | Score max | Review count | Url |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| G2 | 4.7 | 5 | 17 | https://www.g2.com/products/gitea/reviews |



### Review themes



#### Praised

- Lightweight and fast
- Easy to install and configure
- User-friendly and intuitive interface
- Full self-hosted data ownership
- GitHub Actions compatibility
- Active open-source community and rapid release cadence
- Runs on diverse platforms and low-powered hardware



#### Criticized

- Enterprise features require paid tier
- Requires Linux/server administration knowledge
- Can be slow with very large codebases
- Less support depth than GitHub or GitLab
- Documentation limited for advanced configurations
- Higher server resource usage than expected for smaller setups




### Company facts

Founded year: 2016
Hq: Delaware, USA (CommitGo, Inc.)


#### Founders

- Lunny Xiao
- Matti Ranta

Employees range: Not available
Total funding: Not available
Valuation: Not available
Arr: Not available
Customer count: Not available
Status: Private


Readiness: Not available


## Ranking

| Display name | Pair count | Total pairs | Presence percent | Avg position |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GitHub | 82 | 150 | 54.666666666666664 | 20.25825825825826 |
| GitLab | 71 | 150 | 47.333333333333336 | 17.20689655172414 |
| Bitbucket | 32 | 150 | 21.333333333333336 | 26.933333333333334 |
| Azure DevOps | 21 | 150 | 14.000000000000002 | 23.2 |
| Sourcegraph | 16 | 150 | 10.666666666666668 | 9.025 |
| Gitea | 8 | 150 | 5.333333333333334 | 28.916666666666668 |
| Graphite | 1 | 150 | 0.6666666666666667 | 49 |



## Platform breakdown

| Platform | Prompt count | Presence rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| google-ai | 0 | 0 |
| chatgpt-search | 2 | 8 |
| perplexity | 1 | 4 |
| bing-copilot-search | 0 | 0 |
| google-ai-mode | 1 | 4 |
| xai-search | 4 | 16 |



## Strengths





## Gaps

| Prompt text | Competitor presence count |
| --- | --- |
| What are the best tools for cross-repository code search at scale — finding all usages of a deprecated function across 300 repos instantly? | 6 |
| Which hosted Git platforms have the best disaster recovery and geo-redundancy — how long until push and pull are restored after a datacenter failure? | 6 |
| Which code collaboration platforms integrate best with secrets scanning and security scanning tools to block vulnerable code before it merges? | 5 |
| Which Git platforms offer the best partial clone and sparse checkout support for teams who can't clone an entire massive monorepo locally? | 5 |
| Which code review platforms are best at keeping review workflows fast and avoiding multi-day bottlenecks — what features actually make the difference? | 5 |



## Topic scores

| Topic name | Prompt count | Cited prompt count |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability | 5 | 1 |
| Developer Experience | 5 | 0 |
| Integrations & Ecosystem | 5 | 1 |
| Performance & Reliability | 5 | 2 |
| Setup & First Run | 5 | 1 |



## Prompt results

- Prompt text: Which self-hosted Git platforms are best for enterprises with strict data residency requirements — is the operational overhead worth it compared to managed options?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: 17



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 4 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 2 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 5 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 4 |
| Gitea | 17 |
| GitLab | 26 |
| Bitbucket | 32 |


- Prompt text: What tooling helps reduce merge conflicts in a monorepo where dozens of engineers are committing to overlapping areas simultaneously?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |



##### Perplexity





##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 26 |
| Sourcegraph | 40 |
| Graphite | 49 |


- Prompt text: Which code review platforms have the best CI/CD pipeline integrations for making failed checks automatically block merges?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 2 |
| Azure DevOps | 3 |
| Bitbucket | 11 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 2 |
| Bitbucket | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Bitbucket | 4 |
| GitHub | 22 |
| GitLab | 30 |


- Prompt text: Which enterprise code collaboration platforms offer the best SAML/SSO and SCIM provisioning support for automated user lifecycle management?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 4 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 5 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 21 |


- Prompt text: Which Git platforms offer the best clone and fetch performance for large repositories — how do cloud-hosted and self-hosted options compare?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: 62



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| Azure DevOps | 2 |
| GitLab | 3 |
| Bitbucket | 17 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 6 |



##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 7 |



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 11 |
| Bitbucket | 15 |
| GitLab | 22 |
| Gitea | 62 |


- Prompt text: Which code collaboration platforms integrate most deeply with project management tools — which ones can automatically move a ticket to in-review when a commit references it?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 4 |
| GitHub | 6 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 3 |
| Azure DevOps | 5 |
| Bitbucket | 6 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 3 |
| GitHub | 4 |
| Bitbucket | 5 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 7 |
| Bitbucket | 8 |
| GitLab | 12 |
| Azure DevOps | 40 |


- Prompt text: What engineering metrics platforms give managers visibility into cycle time and review turnaround without micromanaging the team?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search





##### Perplexity





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 4 |
| Sourcegraph | 12 |


- Prompt text: What are the best code collaboration platforms for onboarding a remote team of 20 engineers with minimal disruption to active sprints?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |
| Bitbucket | 5 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |
| Bitbucket | 4 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Bitbucket | 37 |
| GitHub | 45 |
| GitLab | 63 |
| Azure DevOps | 68 |


- Prompt text: Which code collaboration platforms integrate best with secrets scanning and security scanning tools to block vulnerable code before it merges?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 4 |
| Azure DevOps | 9 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 3 |
| GitLab | 6 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| Azure DevOps | 4 |
| GitLab | 29 |
| Bitbucket | 58 |


- Prompt text: Which code collaboration platforms offer the best enterprise SLAs and availability during planned maintenance — what should teams compare?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 3 |
| GitLab | 7 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 2 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 4 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 2 |
| Bitbucket | 26 |
| GitLab | 36 |
| Azure DevOps | 51 |


- Prompt text: Which code collaboration platforms handle large binary files and machine learning model artifacts best alongside source code in the same repo?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 3 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 2 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Bitbucket | 9 |
| GitHub | 23 |
| Azure DevOps | 40 |
| GitLab | 49 |


- Prompt text: Which code collaboration platforms make it easiest to set up branch protection rules and merge policies from day one for a growing engineering team?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 4 |



##### Chatgpt-search





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 4 |
| Bitbucket | 7 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 2 |
| GitHub | 3 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 11 |
| Azure DevOps | 41 |
| Bitbucket | 63 |


- Prompt text: Which tooling makes stacked pull request workflows less painful to manage in practice — what do teams actually use for this?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 4 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 4 |



##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 3 |



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 2 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 13 |


- Prompt text: What monorepo tooling should a 50-person engineering team evaluate — which platforms best support monorepo, polyrepo, or hybrid repository structures?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 2 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 3 |
| GitHub | 9 |
| GitLab | 10 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 8 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 4 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 8 |
| Bitbucket | 25 |


- Prompt text: Which Git platforms offer the best partial clone and sparse checkout support for teams who can't clone an entire massive monorepo locally?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| Azure DevOps | 3 |
| GitLab | 5 |
| Bitbucket | 10 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 4 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |
| Azure DevOps | 18 |
| Bitbucket | 54 |


- Prompt text: Which code review tools offer the most useful AI suggestions — which platforms surface actionable feedback rather than just adding noise for reviewers?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 6 |



##### Perplexity





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 2 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 17 |


- Prompt text: What are the best tools for cross-repository code search at scale — finding all usages of a deprecated function across 300 repos instantly?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |
| GitHub | 4 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |
| GitHub | 5 |



##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 1 |
| GitHub | 2 |
| GitLab | 33 |


- Prompt text: What tools make it easiest to migrate a 10-year-old SVN repository to Git without losing commit history or tags?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 5 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Azure DevOps | 13 |
| Bitbucket | 22 |


- Prompt text: Which hosted Git platforms have the best disaster recovery and geo-redundancy — how long until push and pull are restored after a datacenter failure?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| Azure DevOps | 4 |
| GitHub | 7 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |



##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 2 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 11 |
| Bitbucket | 72 |


- Prompt text: Which code review platforms are best at keeping review workflows fast and avoiding multi-day bottlenecks — what features actually make the difference?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 2 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 3 |
| GitLab | 7 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Sourcegraph | 3 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Bitbucket | 1 |
| GitHub | 29 |


- Prompt text: Which Git platforms offer the best webhook and API support for building internal developer tooling on top of repo events?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: 2
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: 2
Xai-search: 50



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Gitea | 2 |
| GitHub | 4 |
| GitLab | 13 |
| Azure DevOps | 31 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |
| Azure DevOps | 6 |
| Bitbucket | 7 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| Gitea | 2 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 11 |
| Gitea | 50 |
| Bitbucket | 59 |


- Prompt text: What tools help large engineering teams manage code ownership so the right reviewers are auto-assigned without spamming everyone?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 2 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 2 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Bitbucket | 3 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| Bitbucket | 15 |
| GitLab | 22 |


- Prompt text: Which platforms offer the best pull request automation — auto-merging, required checks, dependency updates — without introducing excessive risk?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 4 |
| Bitbucket | 7 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |
| GitLab | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 3 |
| Bitbucket | 40 |
| GitLab | 55 |


- Prompt text: Which Git hosting platforms handle massive monorepos best — which ones stay performant when a repo grows to millions of files and hundreds of thousands of commits?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: 45



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 2 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 3 |
| Azure DevOps | 8 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| Azure DevOps | 2 |
| GitHub | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 2 |
| GitHub | 5 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 13 |
| Bitbucket | 27 |
| GitLab | 37 |
| Gitea | 45 |


- Prompt text: Which enterprise Git platforms offer the most flexible access control — which ones support read-only contractor access to specific repos without a full seat license?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai: Not available
Chatgpt-search: 11
Perplexity: 8
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Google-ai-mode: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 2 |
| Bitbucket | 7 |
| Azure DevOps | 9 |
| Gitea | 11 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Bitbucket | 1 |
| GitHub | 3 |
| GitLab | 5 |
| Azure DevOps | 6 |
| Gitea | 8 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitHub | 1 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitLab | 1 |
| GitHub | 4 |
| Azure DevOps | 46 |





## Top sources

| Url | Title | Domain | Logo url | Source vertical | Content type | Citation count | Last30d count |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| https://docs.gitea.com/usage/access-control/permissions/ | Permissions | docs.gitea.com | Not available | commercial | documentation | 3 | 3 |
| https://docs.gitea.com/1.23/usage/webhooks/ | Webhooks \| Gitea Documentation | docs.gitea.com | Not available | commercial | documentation | 1 | 1 |
| https://docs.gitea.com/usage/repository/webhooks | Gitea documentation | docs.gitea.com | Not available | commercial | documentation | 1 | 1 |
| https://docs.gitea.com/installation/comparison/ | Compared to other Git hosting \| Gitea Documentation | docs.gitea.com | Not available | commercial | documentation | 1 | 1 |
| https://docs.gitea.com/next/usage/access-control/permissions/ | Permissions \| Gitea Documentation | docs.gitea.com | Not available | commercial | documentation | 1 | 1 |
| https://docs.gitea.com/installation/comparison | Compared to other Git hosting \| Gitea Documentation | docs.gitea.com | Not available | commercial | documentation | 2 | 0 |
| https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea | go-gitea/gitea: Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all ... | github.com | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/3b85de80-82a1-4ef6-a126-ddcca4320279/de0d31e4e604ed3015031cab5d314875f5f41969.png | commercial | github | 1 | 0 |
| https://docs.gitea.com/usage/webhooks | Webhooks \| Gitea Documentation | docs.gitea.com | Not available | commercial | docs | 1 | 0 |



## Response excerpts

| Prompt text | Platform | Excerpt |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Which self-hosted Git platforms are best for enterprises with strict data residency requirements — is the operational overhead worth it compared to managed options? | bing-copilot-search | Gitea / Forgejo\| Lightweight, open-source, single binary deployment, low resource use. |
| Which Git platforms offer the best clone and fetch performance for large repositories — how do cloud-hosted and self-hosted options compare? | bing-copilot-search | ...ce for large repositories due to CDN distribution and optimized packfile serving, while self-hosted platforms (GitLab CE/EE, Gitea, bare Git servers) can match or exceed performance if tuned locally but require significant maintenance. ## 🔑 Key Compa... |
| What are the best code collaboration platforms for onboarding a remote team of 20 engineers with minimal disruption to active sprints? | bing-copilot-search | ...-\|---\|---\|---\|--- GitHub Code Collaboration Tool Selection Guide: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, GitKraken, Gitea, SourceHut, and Linear (2026)\| Largest ecosystem, pull requests... |



## Competitor excerpts

| Platform | Competitor name | Excerpt |
| --- | --- | --- |
| google-ai | Sourcegraph | Sourcegraph Finding every usage or reference of a deprecated function instantly across 300+ repositories requires enterprise-grade multi-repo search tools. |
| chatgpt-search | Sourcegraph | ## Best tools for cross-repository code search ## 1. Sourcegraph — best overall for large-scale engineering Top pick Search across many repositories and code hosts using exact text, regex, Boolean queries, and repository filters. |
| perplexity | Sourcegraph | Sourcegraph — best purpose-built option for frequent, organization-wide searches. It searches across connected code hosts, supports literal and regex queries, and lets you target repository sets with search contexts. |
| bing-copilot-search | Sourcegraph | The best tools for instantly finding all usages of a deprecated function across 300+ repositories are Sourcegraph, Zoekt, and GitHub’s new Code Search. |
| google-ai-mode | Sourcegraph | The industry standard and most effective tools for cross-repository code search at scale break down by enterprise-readiness and open-source flexibility: * * Sourcegraph : The undisputed gold standard for enterprise multi-repo search. |
| google-ai | GitLab | When comparing the major enterprise hosted Git platforms ( GitHub , GitLab , and Bitbucket Cloud ) regarding disaster recovery, geo-redundancy, and restoration times, performance depends heavily on whether you are using multi-tenant cloud Saa... |
| chatgpt-search | GitLab | \| Platform \| Geo-redundancy and recovery evidence \| Published recovery target \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| GitLab Dedicated \| Optional secondary region with continuous replication of databases, repositories, and object storage. |
| perplexity | GitLab | \| Platform / offering \| What the published information says \| What that means for push/pull recovery \| \|---\|---\|---\| \| GitLab Dedicated with a secondary region \| GitLab states an RTO of eight hours or less for restoration to the secondary region. |
| bing-copilot-search | GitLab | GitLab Dedicated\| Primary \+ secondary AWS region with continuous Geo replication\| ≤ 8 hours\| ≤ 4 hours\| Automated backups every 4 hours; continuous replication of repos, DB, and object storage.[Disaster recovery for GitLab Dedicated and GitLab De... |
| google-ai-mode | GitLab | GitHub and GitLab (via GitLab Dedicated/Geo) provide the most robust enterprise disaster recovery and geo-redundancy, with automated or managed failovers restoring push and pull operations typically within minutes to under 8 hours (RTO), depending on t... |
| google-ai-mode | GitHub | GitHub and GitLab (via GitLab Dedicated/Geo) provide the most robust enterprise disaster recovery and geo-redundancy, with automated or managed failovers restoring push and pull operations typically within minutes to under 8 hours (RTO), depending on t... |
| google-ai | GitLab | GitLab Docs * Code Scanning (SAST): Powered by CodeQL , GitHub scans code on every pull request. |



## Trend

Visibility delta: 1.2000000000000002
Avg position delta: 5
Citation count delta: 4