# Waydev AI visibility in Software Engineering Intelligence & Developer Productivity

Canonical: https://devtune.ai/verticals/software-engineering-intelligence/waydev

[Website](https://waydev.co/)

Latest AI responses: 2026-11-11
[Tracked on paid plans](https://devtune.ai/pricing): Google AI Mode, Microsoft Bing Copilot Search, Claude with web search, Grok Search
Prompts: 25
Runs: 3


## Platforms

- chatgpt-search
- google-ai
- perplexity

Rank: 5
Joint rank: true
Total brands: 9
Measured responses: 75
Presence percent: 6.666666666666667
Share of voice percent: 4.979253112033195
Average position: 13
Docs presence percent: 0
Blog presence percent: 0
Brand mention percent: 16


## Profile

Overview: Waydev is a software engineering intelligence platform for engineering leaders, founded in 2017 and headquartered in San Francisco. It connects to Git hosts, ticketing systems, CI/CD and AI coding tools through read-only APIs, and says it never ingests source code. The platform reports delivery, quality, developer-experience and cost metrics based on DORA and SPACE, and it has been rebuilt around measuring the adoption, impact and ROI of AI coding tools and agents. Features include AI spend tracking, a natural-language Waydev Agent, custom dashboards, resource planning, project costs and cost capitalization. Waydev uses per-active-contributor annual pricing with a free tier for up to 25 contributors. The company is a Y Combinator W21 alumnus, privately held, and reports a bootstrapped path to profitability. It competes with Jellyfish, LinearB, Swarmia, DX and Faros AI.
Product summary: Waydev is an AI-native engineering intelligence platform. It combines Git, ticketing, CI/CD and AI-tool usage data into reports on AI adoption, impact and ROI, delivery performance (DORA, cycle time, pull requests, sprints), developer experience, planning and costs. It also provides the Waydev Agent, Signals alerts, Studio dashboards and an MCP server.


### Key capabilities

- AI adoption, impact and ROI measurement across Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code and Codex
- AI spend and token-usage tracking with cost per PR
- AI code-to-production tracking and commit-level AI checkpoints
- DORA metrics, cycle time, pull request insights and sprint commitment reports
- Developer experience surveys (Slack/Teams) and SPACE framework module
- Waydev Agent for natural-language questions, forecasts and editable SQL
- Custom dashboards, metrics and reports, including prompt-built dashboards
- Resource planning, project costs and cost capitalization
- Signals, goals, targets and AI governance with budgets and usage limits
- Waydev MCP server and API access



### Target users

- Engineering leaders (CTOs, VPs of Engineering)
- Engineering managers and team leads
- Finance and executive stakeholders tracking AI and engineering spend
- Developer productivity and platform teams
- Enterprise engineering organizations adopting AI coding tools



### Key use cases

- Proving the ROI of AI coding tools and agents to executives and boards
- Tracking DORA metrics and engineering delivery performance
- Spotting delivery bottlenecks in cycle time and pull requests
- Measuring developer experience with surveys combined with Git and ticketing data
- Sprint forecasting and capacity planning
- Allocating engineering cost to projects and capitalizing software costs
- Setting AI tool budgets, usage caps and policies

Integrations ecosystem: Waydev connects through read-only APIs. Per its docs, code hosts include GitHub and GitHub Enterprise, Bitbucket and Bitbucket Server, GitLab and GitLab Self-Hosted, Azure DevOps and Azure DevOps Server, AWS CodeCommit and Gerrit. Ticketing integrations include Jira and Jira Server, Azure Boards and ClickUp. AI tool integrations include GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, Devin, AugmentCode and OpenCode. A Slack bot is available, and Teams is supported for DX surveys. CI/CD integrations, an API and a Waydev MCP server are also offered. MCP works with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Claude Desktop, ChatGPT, VS Code and Windsurf. Self-hosted and on-premise Git and ticketing options are on the Enterprise plan.
Pricing summary: Billed annually per active contributor, meaning people who pushed code in the billing month. Managers, executives and finance read reports free as "operational users". Waydev's pricing page lists: Start Up at $0 (up to 25 contributors, 10 repos, 3 months of data); Pro at $29 per contributor per month ($17,400/year for 50); Premium at $49 per contributor per month ($29,400/year for 50, adding AI impact and ROI, Waydev Agent with 200 questions a month, Planning, Studio, and DX and SPACE); and Enterprise at a custom volume rate with a free proof of concept, self-hosting and SAML SSO. Waydev's separate /pricing/ page shows quote-based pricing, and AWS Marketplace lists different annual rates and limits, so confirm current figures with Waydev.
Review summary: Waydev rates 4.7/5 on G2 (about 61 reviews) and 4.5/5 on Capterra (37 reviews). Reviewers praise the responsive support, ease of use, integrations, and the visibility it gives into team activity for 1:1s and management reporting. Criticisms include the learning curve and initial setup effort, the difficulty of interpreting the Impact metric, cost for small teams, and the fact that most Capterra reviews date from 2019-2020.
Competitive positioning: Waydev positions itself as an AI-native engineering intelligence platform. Its emphasis is measuring the adoption, impact and ROI of AI coding tools and agents (Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code, Codex), alongside delivery analytics built on DORA, SPACE and developer-experience surveys. Differentiators it cites are read-only access that never ingests source code, a natural-language Waydev Agent with editable SQL, an MCP server, and pricing per active contributor with free read access for managers and executives. Waydev says it is bootstrapped apart from Y Combinator, in a category where Jellyfish, LinearB, Code Climate and Faros AI have raised venture funding. It is a small company (about 11-50 employees) competing with larger, better-funded vendors.
Limitations: Third-party commentary and G2-sourced critiques say the proprietary "Impact" metric can be hard to explain to stakeholders and that the 130+ metrics can overwhelm teams. Some reviewers say setup, such as mapping team members and configuring data views, takes time up front. Pricing is annual-only per active contributor, with no monthly option published. Plan limits (data history, repositories) and free-tier availability differ across Waydev's pricing pages and marketplace listings. Capterra reviews are mostly older (2019-2020), and G2 has a modest review count (about 61). Enterprise pricing is quote-only. Third-party reviewers also note a reported 2020 security incident involving OAuth tokens, which this research did not independently verify.


### Source urls

- https://waydev.co/
- https://waydev.co/features/what-is-waydev/
- https://waydev.co/features/
- https://waydev.co/pricing-new/
- https://waydev.co/pricing/
- https://docs.waydev.co/docs/supported-integrations
- https://docs.waydev.co/docs/faq
- https://docs.waydev.co/docs/integrations
- https://changelog.waydev.co/waydev-new-platform-release-ai-code-to-production-token-usage-checkpoints-and-waydev-mcp-FFJVS
- https://www.g2.com/it/products/waydev/reviews?qs=pros-and-cons
- https://www.capterra.com/p/179273/Waydev/reviews/
- https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-kutv7cls7teoc
- https://waydev.co/sovos-case-study/
- https://waydev.co/tackle-case-study/
- https://waydev.co/retreat-guru-case-study/
- https://waydev.co/about-alex-circei/
- https://waydev.co/why-we-rebuilt-waydev-for-the-ai-era/
- https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/waydev
- https://tracxn.com/d/companies/waydev/__1w31Jb_AF4nCWBwyZq8BB3oFTFCGaInm42pqZXIg6XQ
- https://getlatka.com/companies/waydev

Research approved: 2026-11-05T21:22:58.404831+00:00


### Customer outcomes

| Customer | Summary | Metric |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sovos | The tax and compliance company used Waydev to find tooling and environment problems and to coach engineers on commit practices. Its Director of Technology said productive throughput almost doubled over three months compared with the prior three, with commits per day and active da | Productive throughput almost doubled; commits per day and active days up 20-30% |
| Tackle | Tackle's engineering leaders said Waydev gave them visibility into the software development process, and that measuring and drilling into cycle time reduced it considerably. The case study gives no percentage. | Not available |
| Retreat Guru | Managers used Waydev's Work Log, Developer Summary and Activity Heatmap reports to see team activity, run more focused one-to-ones and schedule less disruptive meetings. The case study is qualitative. | Not available |



### Reviews breakdown

| Platform | Score | Score max | Review count | Url |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| G2 | 4.7 | 5 | 61 | https://www.g2.com/it/products/waydev/reviews?qs=pros-and-cons |
| Capterra | 4.5 | 5 | 37 | https://www.capterra.com/p/179273/Waydev/reviews/ |



### Review themes



#### Praised

- Fast, responsive customer support
- Easy to use with clean, simple interface
- Useful visibility into team activity and productivity
- Wide range of integrations
- Helps structure one-on-one and management conversations
- Strong analytics and trends reporting



#### Criticized

- Initial setup, team mapping and data-view configuration take time
- Impact metric is hard to explain to stakeholders
- Perceived as expensive for small teams
- Some reports needed more high-level views, per older reviews
- Metric overload for teams that only need a few indicators




### Company facts

Founded year: 2017
Hq: San Francisco, California, USA


#### Founders

- Alex Circei
- Valentin Buzea

Employees range: 11-50
Total funding: ~$120K (third-party estimate)
Valuation: Not available
Arr: ~$3M (third-party estimate)
Customer count: 300+ companies (company-stated)
Status: Private (Y Combinator W21)


Readiness: Not available


## Ranking

| Display name | Pair count | Total pairs | Presence percent | Avg position |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 35 | 75 | 46.666666666666664 | 5.211267605633803 |
| LinearB | 27 | 75 | 36 | 5.386363636363637 |
| Swarmia | 25 | 75 | 33.33333333333333 | 5.4 |
| DX | 17 | 75 | 22.666666666666664 | 8.045454545454545 |
| Waydev | 5 | 75 | 6.666666666666667 | 13 |
| Faros AI | 5 | 75 | 6.666666666666667 | 26 |
| Allstacks | 4 | 75 | 5.333333333333334 | 2 |
| Uplevel | 1 | 75 | 1.3333333333333335 | 3 |
| Hatica | 1 | 75 | 1.3333333333333335 | 5 |



## Platform breakdown

| Platform | Prompt count | Presence rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| chatgpt-search | 2 | 8 |
| google-ai | 1 | 4 |
| perplexity | 2 | 8 |



## Strengths

| Prompt text | Platform count | Avg position |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Which engineering intelligence platforms integrate with the widest range of source control, issue tracking, incident and CI/CD tools? | 1 | 1 |
| Which engineering analytics tools handle a mix of cloud-hosted and self-managed engineering systems, with private deployment options for regulated companies? | 1 | 1 |



## Gaps

| Prompt text | Competitor presence count |
| --- | --- |
| Which developer productivity platforms sync with HR and payroll systems to attribute engineering investment by team and cost? | 3 |
| What engineering intelligence vendors have a track record of rolling out to 500+ developers without a long services engagement? | 3 |
| What are the best tools that combine developer sentiment surveys with delivery data to find what slows teams down? | 3 |
| Which tools support software capitalization reporting for finance, based on actual engineering activity? | 3 |
| Which tools give engineering leaders useful benchmarks against industry peers in the first month, before we have much history of our own? | 3 |



## Topic scores

| Topic name | Prompt count | Cited prompt count |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability | 5 | 1 |
| Developer Experience | 5 | 0 |
| Integrations & Ecosystem | 5 | 2 |
| Performance & Reliability | 5 | 1 |
| Setup & First Run | 5 | 0 |



## Prompt results

- Prompt text: Which platforms measure the adoption, cost and real impact of AI coding assistants across teams and tools?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| DX | 1 |
| Jellyfish | 2 |



##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 1 |


- Prompt text: Which engineering analytics platforms can a 40-person engineering team set up in an afternoon to get baseline cycle time and deployment metrics?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Swarmia | 1 |
| LinearB | 2 |



##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| LinearB | 1 |
| Jellyfish | 3 |


- Prompt text: Which engineering metrics platforms do developers trust and accept, without it feeling like surveillance or individual stack ranking?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Swarmia | 1 |
| DX | 2 |
| LinearB | 4 |
| Jellyfish | 5 |



##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Swarmia | 1 |
| LinearB | 3 |
| Jellyfish | 4 |


- Prompt text: Which engineering intelligence tools surface insights in team chat and pull requests, so engineers don't need another dashboard?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Swarmia | 3 |
| Jellyfish | 8 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Swarmia | 1 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Swarmia | 5 |
| Jellyfish | 6 |


- Prompt text: Which engineering analytics platforms forecast delivery risk and roadmap slippage across multiple teams and initiatives?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: 5



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 1 |
| LinearB | 6 |



##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Allstacks | 1 |
| Jellyfish | 2 |
| LinearB | 4 |
| Waydev | 5 |


- Prompt text: Which developer productivity platforms sync with HR and payroll systems to attribute engineering investment by team and cost?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 1 |
| Swarmia | 3 |
| LinearB | 6 |
| Faros AI | 8 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Swarmia | 3 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 1 |


- Prompt text: Which platforms help team leads set working agreements and track them, such as review turnaround time and work-in-progress limits?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search





##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 1 |


- Prompt text: What should I look at when picking a developer productivity platform to replace homegrown spreadsheets and ad-hoc scripts for engineering reporting?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search





##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity




- Prompt text: What engineering intelligence vendors have a track record of rolling out to 500+ developers without a long services engagement?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| DX | 1 |
| Jellyfish | 4 |
| Faros AI | 6 |
| LinearB | 8 |
| Swarmia | 11 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Uplevel | 1 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 2 |


- Prompt text: What are the best developer productivity tools whose metrics hold up when teams use inconsistent ticket and branching conventions?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| DX | 1 |
| LinearB | 6 |
| Jellyfish | 9 |



##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| DX | 2 |
| Swarmia | 3 |
| Jellyfish | 6 |


- Prompt text: Which engineering intelligence platforms integrate with the widest range of source control, issue tracking, incident and CI/CD tools?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: 1
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| DX | 1 |
| Jellyfish | 3 |
| LinearB | 5 |
| Swarmia | 7 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Waydev | 1 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 1 |
| LinearB | 3 |
| Swarmia | 4 |


- Prompt text: What are my options for engineering metrics tools with a free tier for a team under ten developers that is just starting to measure delivery?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Swarmia | 1 |
| LinearB | 8 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| LinearB | 1 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 4 |
| LinearB | 6 |


- Prompt text: Which platforms have the most trustworthy DORA metric calculations, with transparent definitions we can audit and adjust?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| DX | 10 |
| Swarmia | 11 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| DX | 1 |



##### Perplexity




- Prompt text: What engineering analytics tools do engineering managers prefer for running retrospectives and one-on-ones with real data?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search





##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 1 |
| LinearB | 4 |


- Prompt text: What are the best tools that combine developer sentiment surveys with delivery data to find what slows teams down?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| DX | 1 |
| Jellyfish | 2 |
| Swarmia | 3 |
| LinearB | 4 |
| Hatica | 5 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| DX | 1 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| LinearB | 1 |
| Jellyfish | 3 |


- Prompt text: Which engineering intelligence platforms connect to our source control, ticketing and CI systems with the least configuration and data cleanup?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 1 |
| Swarmia | 3 |
| DX | 4 |
| Faros AI | 5 |
| LinearB | 8 |



##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Swarmia | 1 |
| LinearB | 2 |
| Jellyfish | 3 |


- Prompt text: Which engineering intelligence vendors offer open APIs and custom data models so we aren't locked into their built-in metrics?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: 27
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: 4



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Faros AI | 1 |
| Jellyfish | 4 |
| LinearB | 5 |
| DX | 6 |
| Waydev | 27 |



##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Waydev | 4 |


- Prompt text: What tools let us export raw engineering metrics to our data warehouse so analysts can build custom reports?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Swarmia | 1 |
| DX | 2 |
| Jellyfish | 9 |



##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 1 |


- Prompt text: Which tools support software capitalization reporting for finance, based on actual engineering activity?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Allstacks | 1 |
| Jellyfish | 2 |
| Swarmia | 4 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Allstacks | 3 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Swarmia | 1 |
| Jellyfish | 2 |
| Allstacks | 3 |
| LinearB | 5 |
| DX | 8 |


- Prompt text: What engineering analytics tools work well with an existing internal developer portal or service catalog so ownership data stays consistent?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| DX | 1 |
| Jellyfish | 2 |
| LinearB | 3 |
| Swarmia | 4 |



##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| DX | 1 |


- Prompt text: Which engineering analytics tools handle a mix of cloud-hosted and self-managed engineering systems, with private deployment options for regulated companies?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: 1
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Waydev | 1 |
| DX | 4 |
| Faros AI | 9 |
| Jellyfish | 11 |
| Swarmia | 13 |



##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| LinearB | 1 |
| Swarmia | 3 |


- Prompt text: What are the best engineering intelligence tools for showing the board how engineering time splits across new features, maintenance and unplanned work?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 4 |



##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 1 |


- Prompt text: Which engineering intelligence platforms stay accurate and fast when ingesting data from thousands of repositories across a large enterprise?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| LinearB | 3 |
| Swarmia | 5 |



##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity




- Prompt text: Which tools give engineering leaders useful benchmarks against industry peers in the first month, before we have much history of our own?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 1 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| LinearB | 2 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jellyfish | 1 |


- Prompt text: What platforms offer workflow automation, such as automatic pull request routing and review nudges, alongside DORA metrics?


#### Brand position by platform

Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Perplexity: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| LinearB | 1 |
| Swarmia | 4 |



##### Google-ai





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| LinearB | 1 |





## Top sources

| Url | Title | Domain | Logo url | Source vertical | Content type | Citation count | Last30d count |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| https://waydev.co/features/enterprise-engineering-analytics/ | Enterprise Engineering Analytics Platform \| Waydev | waydev.co | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/e11379d2-4226-4fa9-8070-29f568b246ec/e4d0eef0e507fbf3808c878a97a9c0dc89c71a4f.tone-dark.png | commercial | product_page | 3 | 3 |
| https://waydev.co/navigating-the-software-engineering-intelligence/ | Engineering Intelligence Platforms: Enterprise Buyer Guide | waydev.co | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/e11379d2-4226-4fa9-8070-29f568b246ec/e4d0eef0e507fbf3808c878a97a9c0dc89c71a4f.tone-dark.png | commercial | article | 3 | 3 |
| https://waydev.co/github-analytics-bitbucket-analytics-gitlab-analytics/ | Waydev: Github, Bitbucket, Azure Devops & Gitlab Analytics | waydev.co | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/e11379d2-4226-4fa9-8070-29f568b246ec/e4d0eef0e507fbf3808c878a97a9c0dc89c71a4f.tone-dark.png | commercial | product_page | 1 | 1 |
| https://waydev.co/enterprise/ | Waydev for Enterprise | waydev.co | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/e11379d2-4226-4fa9-8070-29f568b246ec/e4d0eef0e507fbf3808c878a97a9c0dc89c71a4f.tone-dark.png | commercial | landing_page | 1 | 1 |
| https://waydev.co//jellyfish-alternatives/ | Jellyfish Alternatives: Engineering ROI & AI \| Waydev | waydev.co | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/e11379d2-4226-4fa9-8070-29f568b246ec/e4d0eef0e507fbf3808c878a97a9c0dc89c71a4f.tone-dark.png | commercial | comparison | 1 | 1 |
| https://waydev.co/features/what-is-waydev/ | What Is Waydev? Engineering Intelligence Explained | waydev.co | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/e11379d2-4226-4fa9-8070-29f568b246ec/e4d0eef0e507fbf3808c878a97a9c0dc89c71a4f.tone-dark.png | commercial | product_page | 1 | 1 |
| https://waydev.co/pricing/ | Waydev Pricing \| Enterprise Engineering Intelligence & AI ROI | waydev.co | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/e11379d2-4226-4fa9-8070-29f568b246ec/e4d0eef0e507fbf3808c878a97a9c0dc89c71a4f.tone-dark.png | commercial | product_page | 1 | 1 |
| https://waydev.co/features/predictable-delivery/ | Software Delivery Predictability & Forecasting \| Waydev | waydev.co | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/e11379d2-4226-4fa9-8070-29f568b246ec/e4d0eef0e507fbf3808c878a97a9c0dc89c71a4f.tone-dark.png | commercial | product_page | 1 | 1 |



## Response excerpts

| Prompt text | Platform | Excerpt |
| --- | --- | --- |
| What engineering analytics tools do engineering managers prefer for running retrospectives and one-on-ones with real data? | chatgpt-search | For retrospectives and one-on-ones, I'd shortlist six tools: LinearB, Swarmia, Jellyfish, DX, Waydev, and Haystack. |
| Which engineering analytics tools handle a mix of cloud-hosted and self-managed engineering systems, with private deployment options for regulated companies? | chatgpt-search | There are three particularly relevant options: Waydev, DX, and Faros AI. They differ significantly in how much control they give you over infrastructure and data. |
| Which tools give engineering leaders useful benchmarks against industry peers in the first month, before we have much history of our own? | chatgpt-search | 9 Best Developer Performance Benchmarking Platforms for 2026Jellyfish: Software Engineering Intelligence Platform Jellyfish website 3. Waydev Best for percentile comparisons - Industry benchmarks at P50, P75 and P90. |



## Competitor excerpts

| Platform | Competitor name | Excerpt |
| --- | --- | --- |
| chatgpt-search | Jellyfish | The strongest candidates are Jellyfish, Swarmia, LinearB, and Faros AI. They differ in how deeply they integrate HR and payroll data versus simply estimating engineering effort. |
| chatgpt-search | Swarmia | The strongest candidates are Jellyfish, Swarmia, LinearB, and Faros AI. They differ in how deeply they integrate HR and payroll data versus simply estimating engineering effort. |
| google-ai | Swarmia | Swarmia * How it handles the connection: Swarmia integrates with your HRIS to account for part-time schedules, employee locations, vacations, and sick leave. |
| perplexity | Jellyfish | Jellyfish — combines engineering activity with roster, HR, payroll, and cost data to calculate team and initiative-level effort and cost, and to support capitalization reporting. |
| chatgpt-search | DX | My initial shortlist would be DX, Jellyfish, LinearB, Swarmia and Faros AI. However, there's an important distinction: evidence of operating at 500+ developers is not automatically evidence of a deployment without substantial vendor services. |
| google-ai | Uplevel | ### Alternative Models (Where Services Are Typically Required) Vendors like Uplevel or enterprise-heavy tiers of Jellyfish often approach rollouts for 500+ developers differently. |
| perplexity | Jellyfish | [1] Jellyfish is another candidate: it advertises fully self-service configuration and says it serves 1,000+ engineering organizations. |
| chatgpt-search | DX | ## 1. Best tools compared \| Platform \| Developer surveys \| Delivery analytics \| Best for \| \|---\|---\|---\|---\| \| DX \| Excellent \| Excellent \| Deep developer experience research \| \| Jellyfish \| Excellent \| Excellent \| Connecting sentiment to engineering... |
| chatgpt-search | Jellyfish | ...\| Delivery analytics \| Best for \| \|---\|---\|---\|---\| \| DX \| Excellent \| Excellent \| Deep developer experience research \| \| Jellyfish \| Excellent \| Excellent \| Connecting sentiment to engineering outcomes \| \| Swarmia \| Very good \| Excellent \| Identifying... |
| chatgpt-search | Swarmia | ...Deep developer experience research \| \| Jellyfish \| Excellent \| Excellent \| Connecting sentiment to engineering outcomes \| \| Swarmia \| Very good \| Excellent \| Identifying team-level bottlenecks \| \| LinearB \| Very good \| Excellent \| Diagnosing delivery wor... |
| google-ai | DX | DX (getdx.com) * The Core Focus: Built by industry pioneers in developer experience research (including co-creators of the DORA and SPACE frameworks), DX was specifically designed to bridge qualitative sentiment with system metrics. |
| perplexity | LinearB | For this specific job, LinearB and Jellyfish are the clearest fits in the available results: both put developer feedback beside delivery data so you can investigate whether a reported frustration is also visible in team workflows. |



## Trend

Visibility delta: Not available
Avg position delta: Not available
Citation count delta: Not available