# Snyk AI visibility in DevSecOps & Application Security

Canonical: https://devtune.ai/verticals/devsecops-application-security/snyk

[Website](https://snyk.io/)

Updated: 2026-10-16T02:51:45.583033+00:00
Prompts: 25
Runs: 6


## Platforms

- google-ai-mode
- perplexity
- chatgpt-search
- google-ai
- bing-copilot-search
- xai-search

Rank: 1
Total brands: 12
Measured responses: 150
Presence percent: 28.000000000000004
Share of voice percent: 20.382165605095544
Average position: 24.479166666666668
Docs presence percent: 14.000000000000002
Blog presence percent: 5.333333333333334
Brand mention percent: 69.33333333333334


## Profile

Overview: Snyk is a developer-first application security company founded in 2015 and headquartered in Boston, MA. Its AI Security Platform integrates vulnerability detection and remediation across the full software development lifecycle—covering proprietary code (SAST), open source dependencies (SCA), containers, infrastructure as code, and web APIs (DAST)—through deep integrations with IDEs, source control platforms, and CI/CD pipelines. The platform is powered by Snyk's proprietary DeepCode AI engine, which provides automated, in-context fix suggestions. Trusted by over 3,100 organizations including Google, Atlassian, Revolut, Snowflake, and Spotify, Snyk has raised approximately $1.32B in funding. It reported over $300M in ARR as of late 2024 and was named a 2024 Gartner Peer Insights Customers' Choice for Application Security Testing.
Product summary: Snyk's AI Security Platform is a developer-first, cloud-native application security suite that helps engineering and security teams find, prioritize, and fix vulnerabilities across proprietary code, open source dependencies, container images, infrastructure as code, and web/API attack surfaces. Core products include Snyk Code (SAST), Snyk Open Source (SCA), Snyk Container, Snyk IaC, Snyk API & Web (DAST), and Snyk AppRisk (ASPM). The DeepCode AI engine powers in-IDE and in-PR automated fix suggestions, while the Snyk Vulnerability Database provides the risk intelligence backbone across all products. Snyk recently introduced Evo, an AI agent and model security posture management product, reflecting its strategic expansion into securing agentic AI development workflows. The platform emphasizes developer adoption through freemium access and a broad ecosystem of 109+ SDLC integrations.


### Key capabilities

- Static Application Security Testing (SAST) via Snyk Code with DeepCode AI engine for interfile and data-flow analysis
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA) via Snyk Open Source with license compliance, SBOM generation, and reachability analysis
- Container image and Kubernetes workload vulnerability scanning via Snyk Container
- Infrastructure as Code (IaC) misconfiguration detection and custom rules via Snyk IaC (Terraform, AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes)
- Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and API security discovery via Snyk API & Web
- AI-powered automated fix suggestions via DeepCode AI Fix in IDE, CLI, and pull request workflows
- Risk-based vulnerability prioritization using exploitability, reachability, and deployment context
- Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) and developer security program analytics via Snyk AppRisk
- AI agent and model security governance via Evo by Snyk
- Curated Snyk Vulnerability Database with near-real-time CVE updates (zero-day coverage within ~24 hours)



### Target users

- Software developers and DevOps/platform engineers seeking security in native workflows
- Application security engineers and AppSec program managers
- CISOs and security leadership at mid-market to enterprise organizations
- DevSecOps teams implementing shift-left security practices
- Regulated-industry engineering teams (fintech, healthcare, government)
- Cloud-native and open source development teams



### Key use cases

- Shift-left security integrated into developer IDEs and pull request workflows
- Open source dependency vulnerability detection and automated remediation
- Container and Kubernetes security scanning throughout the build and deploy lifecycle
- Securing AI-generated and AI-assisted code at creation time
- Software supply chain risk management and regulatory SBOM compliance
- Infrastructure as Code security and cloud misconfiguration prevention
- Enterprise AppSec program management, developer education, and security posture reporting
- Regulatory compliance support for PCI DSS, SOC 2, ISO 27001, and FedRAMP environments

Integrations ecosystem: Snyk supports 109+ integrations spanning the full SDLC. IDEs: VS Code, JetBrains suite (IntelliJ, PyCharm, GoLand, Rider, etc.), Eclipse, Android Studio, Cursor. Source control: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure Repos (cloud and self-hosted). CI/CD: Jenkins, GitHub Actions, CircleCI, Azure Pipelines, AWS CodePipeline, TeamCity, Buildkite, Terraform Cloud. Container registries: Docker Hub, Amazon ECR, Azure ACR, Google Container Registry, JFrog Artifactory, Harbor, Quay, Nexus. Container orchestration: Kubernetes. Ticketing and workflow: Jira (Cloud and Server), ServiceNow (SBOM and AVR). Notifications: Slack. Reporting and analytics: Snowflake, Atlassian Compass, ArmorCode. Runtime security: Dynatrace, SentinelOne, Sysdig. AI coding assistants: Amazon Q Dev, Google Gemini Code Assist, Cursor, Claude, Tabnine, Qodo. Compliance: Hyperproof. A Snyk Broker proxy is available for data-residency and self-hosted SCM requirements. Data residency is supported in US, EU, and Australia regions.
Pricing summary: Snyk offers four plan tiers, all billed per contributing developer (defined as anyone who committed to a private repo monitored by Snyk in the last 90 days). Free: $0, unlimited developers, limited monthly tests per product, no Jira or reporting. Team: from $25/month per contributing developer, minimum 5 and maximum 10 developers, includes license compliance and Jira integration, billed monthly or annually. Ignite: from $1,260/year per contributing developer, up to 50 developers, adds unlimited tests, SBOM, AppRisk/ASPM, SAML SSO, self-hosted SCM support, custom IaC rules, 10 DAST targets, and advanced analytics. Enterprise: custom pricing, unlimited developers, includes FedRAMP option, multi-group management, multi-region data residency (US, EU, AU), and premium support options. Individual Snyk products (Code, Open Source, Container, IaC) can be purchased separately within the same plan tier. Snyk API & Web (DAST) and Snyk Learn Program Management are available as paid add-ons.
Review summary: Snyk is broadly well-regarded by developers and security teams for its integration depth, actionable remediation guidance, and ease of adoption. On G2, it holds a 4.5/5 rating across 129 verified reviews at the vendor level, and a 4.4/5 rating with 191 reviews on Gartner Peer Insights for Application Security Testing. FeaturedCustomers reports a 4.8/5 score based on 2,650 reference ratings. Users consistently praise the developer-friendly design, fast scan speeds, high-quality vulnerability database, and CI/CD pipeline integration. Recurring criticisms include alert fatigue from false positives, inconsistent customer support responsiveness, high enterprise pricing relative to point solutions, and the fragmented UI experience for the DAST product. Snyk was named a 2024 Gartner Peer Insights Customers' Choice for Application Security Testing.
Competitive positioning: Snyk occupies the developer-first application security segment, differentiating itself from traditional security-team-centric vendors (Checkmarx, Veracode) by embedding security controls directly into developer workflows—IDEs, SCM pull requests, and CI/CD pipelines—through its AI Security Fabric. Its proprietary DeepCode AI engine provides automated fix suggestions at the point of code creation. The unified platform spans SAST, SCA, container, IaC, DAST, and ASPM, enabling tool consolidation from an average of four AppSec tools to one. Against cloud-native platforms such as Wiz, Snyk positions as the developer-native complement focused on code-stage prevention rather than post-deployment detection. Its freemium model and curated vulnerability database have built strong developer-community brand recognition, cited as a structural moat versus incumbent and emerging rivals alike.
Limitations: Snyk is SaaS-only with no full on-premises deployment; a Snyk Broker proxy partially addresses data-residency concerns but does not replicate a true on-prem model. The DAST product (Snyk API & Web, acquired from Probely in November 2024) operates in a separate interface and is not yet natively integrated into the core Snyk dashboard. Secrets detection is noted by reviewers as comparatively limited versus dedicated tools. Snyk does not address general code quality beyond security, requiring complementary tools such as SonarQube. High alert volumes and false positives are a recurring complaint, particularly at scale. Enterprise licensing costs are seen as significant relative to point solutions. Customer support responsiveness has received mixed reviews, with complaints about slow escalation paths. Some IaC environments (e.g., Ansible) have limited or no coverage.


### Source urls

- https://snyk.io/
- https://snyk.io/about
- https://snyk.io/plans/
- https://snyk.io/integrations/
- https://snyk.io/case-studies/atlassian/
- https://snyk.io/case-studies/revolut/
- https://snyk.io/blog/forrester-tei-snyk-roi/
- https://techcrunch.com/2024/12/06/snyk-hits-300m-arr-but-isnt-rushing-to-go-public/
- https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/blogs/snyk-finds-itself-at-crossroads-as-its-ipo-prospects-dim-p-3955
- https://tracxn.com/d/companies/snyk/__R962gE3cLhPYE6YfvOOI_C7Ek9zrtlGPOgVeCjDvLBI/funding-and-investors
- https://sacra.com/c/snyk/
- https://www.g2.com/sellers/snyk
- https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/application-security-testing/vendor/snyk
- https://www.featuredcustomers.com/vendor/snyk
- https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/684uz2na8

Reviewed at: 2026-04-28T23:07:24.812+00:00


### Customer outcomes

| Customer | Summary | Metric |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Atlassian | Deployed Snyk Container and Snyk Open Source to 3,500+ developers, achieved 100% container scanning coverage across the organization, and ran 5.5 million SCA dependency tests and 3.7 million container scans. | 65% reduction in high severity container vulnerabilities within a few months |
| Komatsu | Adopted Snyk as a replacement for existing security scanning tooling, achieving faster scan speeds and tighter integration with development pipelines and processes. | 2x faster scanning compared to prior tooling |
| Revolut | Implemented Snyk Open Source across hundreds of repositories to secure open source dependencies, enabling automated vulnerability alerting via Slack and achieving and maintaining PCI DSS compliance. | Not available |



### Reviews breakdown

| Platform | Score | Score max | Review count | Url |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| G2 | 4.5 | 5 | 129 | https://www.g2.com/sellers/snyk |
| Gartner Peer Insights | 4.4 | 5 | 191 | https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/application-security-testing/vendor/snyk |
| FeaturedCustomers | 4.8 | 5 | 2650 | https://www.featuredcustomers.com/vendor/snyk |



### Review themes



#### Praised

- Developer-friendly design and frictionless onboarding
- Seamless CI/CD pipeline and IDE integration
- Actionable remediation advice with specific fix versions
- Extensive and frequently updated vulnerability database
- Fast scan speeds reducing pipeline friction
- Reachability analysis reducing false-positive noise (paid tiers)
- Broad multi-language and framework coverage
- Rapid CVE database updates including zero-day coverage



#### Criticized

- High volume of false positive alerts requiring manual triage
- Alert fatigue from excessive findings at scale
- Slow and inconsistent customer support response times
- High enterprise licensing cost relative to point solutions
- DAST product operates in a separate non-integrated interface
- Weak secrets detection compared to dedicated tools
- Complex configuration for managing policies across many repositories
- Limited IaC coverage for some environments such as Ansible




### Company facts

Founded year: 2015
Hq: Boston, USA


#### Founders

- Assaf Hefetz
- Danny Grander
- Guy Podjarny

Employees range: 1000-1500
Total funding: $1.32B
Valuation: $7.4B
Arr: ~$300M+
Customer count: 3,100+
Status: Private


Readiness: Not available


## Ranking

| Display name | Pair count | Total pairs | Presence percent | Avg position |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Snyk | 42 | 150 | 28.000000000000004 | 24.479166666666668 |
| Endor Labs | 37 | 150 | 24.666666666666668 | 22.924050632911392 |
| Checkmarx | 31 | 150 | 20.666666666666668 | 21.4875 |
| Wiz | 28 | 150 | 18.666666666666668 | 22.822580645161292 |
| Semgrep | 24 | 150 | 16 | 25.216666666666665 |
| Veracode | 14 | 150 | 9.333333333333334 | 26.181818181818183 |
| Jit | 9 | 150 | 6 | 23.666666666666668 |
| Aqua Security | 7 | 150 | 4.666666666666667 | 32.25 |
| SonarSource | 6 | 150 | 4 | 23.25 |
| Socket | 4 | 150 | 2.666666666666667 | 6.375 |
| GitGuardian | 3 | 150 | 2 | 28.7 |
| Chainguard | 0 | 150 | 0 | Not available |



## Platform breakdown

| Platform | Prompt count | Presence rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| google-ai-mode | 1 | 4 |
| perplexity | 10 | 40 |
| chatgpt-search | 15 | 60 |
| google-ai | 2 | 8 |
| bing-copilot-search | 0 | 0 |
| xai-search | 14 | 56.00000000000001 |



## Strengths

| Prompt text | Platform count | Avg position |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Which DevSecOps platforms handle vulnerability prioritisation well when there are hundreds of findings across multiple repositories? | 2 | 1.5 |
| Which application security platforms go beyond known CVEs to detect logic-level vulnerabilities and misconfigurations? | 1 | 3 |



## Gaps

| Prompt text | Competitor presence count |
| --- | --- |
| Which security scanning tools are best at reducing noise so developers actually act on alerts instead of ignoring them? | 5 |
| Which software supply chain security tools detect malicious packages, not just known vulnerable versions? | 5 |
| Which SAST tools have the lowest real-world false positive rates and the best tooling for managing them at scale? | 4 |
| What tools cover SAST, DAST, and SCA in one platform — and which do teams use to cover all three vulnerability types without tool sprawl? | 3 |
| Which DevSecOps tools integrate best with SIEM platforms for correlating app security findings with infrastructure events? | 3 |



## Topic scores

| Topic name | Prompt count | Cited prompt count |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability | 5 | 3 |
| Developer Experience | 5 | 5 |
| Integrations & Ecosystem | 5 | 4 |
| Performance & Reliability | 5 | 5 |
| Setup & First Run | 5 | 4 |



## Prompt results

- Prompt text: What secrets management tools are best for a small startup team to ensure developers never commit credentials to the repo?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity





##### Chatgpt-search





##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitGuardian | 28 |


- Prompt text: I'm rolling out a software composition analysis tool across an engineering org — which platforms have the smoothest onboarding for large teams?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: 4
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 2 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 4 |



##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 2 |
| Checkmarx | 12 |
| SonarSource | 27 |
| Wiz | 28 |


- Prompt text: Which security scanning platforms handle availability well so a critical fix can still ship even if the scanning service goes down temporarily?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: 8
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: 65



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 4 |
| Snyk | 8 |



##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 4 |
| Wiz | 6 |
| Checkmarx | 7 |
| Aqua Security | 41 |
| Snyk | 65 |


- Prompt text: Which DevSecOps platforms handle vulnerability prioritisation well when there are hundreds of findings across multiple repositories?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: 1
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: 2



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 4 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 1 |
| Wiz | 6 |
| Semgrep | 8 |



##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 2 |
| Semgrep | 7 |
| Endor Labs | 9 |
| Checkmarx | 11 |
| Wiz | 14 |
| Jit | 17 |
| Aqua Security | 36 |


- Prompt text: Which SAST tools integrate into an existing CI pipeline without slowing down developer velocity?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: 4
Chatgpt-search: 2
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: 38



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 1 |
| Snyk | 4 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 1 |
| Snyk | 2 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 5 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 10 |
| Snyk | 38 |
| Semgrep | 52 |


- Prompt text: Which application security tools offer the best IDE-native experience vs. CI-only scanning — and what are the tradeoffs for developer adoption?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: 2
Chatgpt-search: 1
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: 13



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Checkmarx | 1 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 1 |
| Snyk | 2 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 1 |
| Checkmarx | 2 |
| SonarSource | 4 |
| Veracode | 6 |
| Semgrep | 10 |



##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Wiz | 2 |
| Endor Labs | 4 |
| Checkmarx | 6 |
| Snyk | 13 |
| Veracode | 16 |
| Semgrep | 25 |
| SonarSource | 45 |


- Prompt text: What tools cover SAST, DAST, and SCA in one platform — and which do teams use to cover all three vulnerability types without tool sprawl?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: 25
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Veracode | 3 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Checkmarx | 1 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Checkmarx | 3 |
| Snyk | 25 |
| Veracode | 32 |



##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Jit | 4 |
| Checkmarx | 7 |
| Wiz | 15 |
| Endor Labs | 22 |
| Veracode | 49 |


- Prompt text: Which application security scanning tools are fastest at scale and least likely to slow down PR pipelines as the codebase grows?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: 8
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Checkmarx | 4 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 1 |
| Snyk | 8 |
| SonarSource | 10 |
| Checkmarx | 12 |



##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 6 |
| Checkmarx | 20 |
| Semgrep | 22 |
| Wiz | 26 |
| Jit | 33 |


- Prompt text: Which runtime application security tools have the lowest production overhead and are safe to run on high-traffic services?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: 57



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity





##### Chatgpt-search





##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Wiz | 2 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 53 |
| Snyk | 57 |


- Prompt text: Which DevSecOps platforms have the best two-way integration with ticketing systems for tracking vulnerability remediation end to end?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: 1
Chatgpt-search: 4
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: 35



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 1 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 4 |
| Wiz | 10 |



##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Veracode | 1 |
| Checkmarx | 4 |
| Wiz | 27 |
| Snyk | 35 |
| Endor Labs | 84 |


- Prompt text: Which security scanning tools are best at reducing noise so developers actually act on alerts instead of ignoring them?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: 4
Chatgpt-search: 7
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: 29



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 1 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 1 |
| Snyk | 4 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 1 |
| Endor Labs | 2 |
| Snyk | 7 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 1 |



##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 5 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 1 |
| Checkmarx | 9 |
| Snyk | 29 |
| Wiz | 43 |


- Prompt text: Which enterprise application security platforms scale best when scanning thousands of repositories across multiple teams?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: 13
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: 89



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 1 |
| Checkmarx | 4 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Veracode | 7 |
| Snyk | 13 |
| Checkmarx | 14 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 4 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 4 |
| Checkmarx | 6 |
| Wiz | 7 |
| Semgrep | 34 |
| Snyk | 89 |


- Prompt text: Which security scanning platforms have the best support for SBOM generation workflows for compliance and audit requirements?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: 18
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 18 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 5 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Wiz | 2 |
| Endor Labs | 16 |
| Checkmarx | 19 |
| Jit | 21 |
| Aqua Security | 24 |


- Prompt text: What cloud security posture management tools integrate well with container and orchestration platform security scanning?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity





##### Chatgpt-search





##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Wiz | 8 |
| Checkmarx | 9 |
| Jit | 19 |
| Aqua Security | 49 |


- Prompt text: Which application security tools integrate natively into the pull request workflow so findings can block or warn on merges?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: 1
Perplexity: 4
Chatgpt-search: 13
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: 43



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 1 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 4 |
| Semgrep | 6 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Checkmarx | 2 |
| Snyk | 13 |
| Veracode | 14 |
| Semgrep | 29 |



##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| SonarSource | 7 |
| Endor Labs | 13 |
| Wiz | 31 |
| Veracode | 33 |
| Snyk | 43 |


- Prompt text: Which security vendors update their vulnerability databases fastest after major CVE disclosures like Log4Shell?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: 60



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity





##### Chatgpt-search





##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Wiz | 10 |
| Endor Labs | 21 |
| Checkmarx | 45 |
| Snyk | 60 |


- Prompt text: Which software supply chain security tools detect malicious packages, not just known vulnerable versions?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: 4
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: 6
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: 9



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 1 |
| Socket | 3 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Socket | 1 |
| Snyk | 4 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Socket | 1 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Checkmarx | 1 |
| Snyk | 6 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Checkmarx | 2 |
| Veracode | 5 |
| Snyk | 9 |
| Endor Labs | 11 |
| Socket | 20 |


- Prompt text: What security tooling do teams typically use for managing findings across dozens of repositories from a single security engineer workflow?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: 4
Chatgpt-search: 3
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Wiz | 3 |
| Endor Labs | 4 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 4 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 3 |



##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 3 |
| Wiz | 23 |
| Endor Labs | 39 |


- Prompt text: Which application security platforms are best at communicating vulnerabilities to developers in an actionable way rather than just generating noise?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: 2
Chatgpt-search: 2
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: 35



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 1 |
| Snyk | 2 |



##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 2 |
| Endor Labs | 4 |
| Semgrep | 12 |



##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 2 |
| Wiz | 7 |
| Veracode | 14 |
| Checkmarx | 18 |
| Snyk | 35 |
| Semgrep | 62 |


- Prompt text: What are the best container image scanning tools that catch vulnerabilities before images are pushed to production?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: 3
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Aqua Security | 1 |
| Snyk | 3 |



##### Chatgpt-search





##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Aqua Security | 3 |
| Wiz | 4 |
| Jit | 11 |
| Checkmarx | 12 |


- Prompt text: Which application security platforms go beyond known CVEs to detect logic-level vulnerabilities and misconfigurations?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: 3
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Wiz | 1 |
| Endor Labs | 4 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Checkmarx | 3 |



##### Chatgpt-search





##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 3 |



##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Wiz | 3 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Wiz | 21 |
| Endor Labs | 61 |


- Prompt text: What are the best software supply chain security tools for a polyglot monorepo with Node.js, Python, and Go services?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: 4
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: 39



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 1 |



##### Perplexity

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 4 |



##### Chatgpt-search





##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 6 |
| Wiz | 8 |
| Jit | 14 |
| Snyk | 39 |
| Aqua Security | 67 |


- Prompt text: Which secret scanning tools are best at both detecting credentials in git history and preventing new secrets from being committed?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode





##### Perplexity





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitGuardian | 6 |



##### Google-ai





##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| GitGuardian | 4 |
| Jit | 5 |
| Checkmarx | 20 |


- Prompt text: Which DevSecOps tools integrate best with SIEM platforms for correlating app security findings with infrastructure events?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: 20
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: 57



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Wiz | 1 |
| Veracode | 2 |



##### Perplexity





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Wiz | 2 |
| Snyk | 20 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 5 |



##### Bing-copilot-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Checkmarx | 2 |



##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Checkmarx | 24 |
| Endor Labs | 34 |
| Wiz | 47 |
| Jit | 54 |
| Snyk | 57 |


- Prompt text: Which SAST tools have the lowest real-world false positive rates and the best tooling for managing them at scale?


#### Brand position by platform

Google-ai-mode: Not available
Perplexity: Not available
Chatgpt-search: Not available
Google-ai: Not available
Bing-copilot-search: Not available
Xai-search: Not available



#### Platform rows



##### Google-ai-mode

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 3 |



##### Perplexity





##### Chatgpt-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Semgrep | 3 |
| Veracode | 5 |
| Checkmarx | 7 |



##### Google-ai

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 2 |
| Wiz | 4 |



##### Bing-copilot-search





##### Xai-search

| Display name | Position |
| --- | --- |
| Endor Labs | 1 |
| Checkmarx | 26 |
| SonarSource | 29 |
| Veracode | 36 |
| Semgrep | 47 |





## Top sources

| Url | Title | Domain | Logo url | Source vertical | Content type | Citation count | Last30d count |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| https://snyk.io/product/snyk-code/ | Snyk Code \| SAST Code Scanning Tool \| Code Security Analysis & Fixes \| Snyk | snyk.io | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/b67f9606-50e9-4f35-942d-4f43a200da2c/0dcb0c4b43b435f8d572f1030eeaa0e4888be7d3.png | commercial | product_page | 7 | 7 |
| https://docs.snyk.io/developer-tools/overview | Overview \| Developer tools \| Snyk User Docs | docs.snyk.io | Not available | commercial | documentation | 5 | 5 |
| https://snyk.io/platform/ide-plugins/ | Secure Coding with IDE Plugins \| IDE Security Plugins | snyk.io | https://izgwnlozsmjmqjsnddmg.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/domain-logos/9dbab6f8-54b2-49a0-8181-89a0ed130318/b67f9606-50e9-4f35-942d-4f43a200da2c/0dcb0c4b43b435f8d572f1030eeaa0e4888be7d3.png | commercial | article | 5 | 5 |
| https://docs.snyk.io/scan-fix-and-prevent/scan-with-snyk/snyk-api-web/integrations/issue-tracking/integrate-with-jira-cloud | Integrate with Jira Cloud \| Scan, fix, and prevent | docs.snyk.io | Not available | commercial | documentation | 4 | 4 |
| https://docs.snyk.io/scan-fix-and-prevent/fix/prioritize-issues-for-fixing | Priority Score And Risk... | docs.snyk.io | Not available | commercial | documentation | 4 | 4 |
| https://github.com/snyk/user-docs/blob/main/discover-snyk/implementation-and-setup/enterprise-implementation-guide/create-a-template-organization/connect-your-development-tools.md | user-docs/discover-snyk/implementation-and-setup/enterprise-implementation-guide/create-a-template-organization/connect-your-development-tools.md at main · snyk/user-docs | github.com | Not available | commercial | documentation | 4 | 4 |
| https://docs.snyk.io/ | Homepage | docs.snyk.io | Not available | commercial | documentation | 4 | 4 |
| https://docs.snyk.io/scan-fix-and-prevent/fix/prioritize-issues-for-fixing/malicious-packages | Malicious packages \| Scan, fix, and prevent \| Snyk User Docs | docs.snyk.io | Not available | commercial | documentation | 3 | 3 |



## Response excerpts

| Prompt text | Platform | Excerpt |
| --- | --- | --- |
| I'm rolling out a software composition analysis tool across an engineering org — which platforms have the smoothest onboarding for large teams? | perplexity | Snyk — strongest starting point when developer adoption and low-friction workflows are the priority. |
| Which security scanning platforms handle availability well so a critical fix can still ship even if the scanning service goes down temporarily? | perplexity | [1] Snyk can also be configured so a temporary service outage doesn’t block a critical release, but that’s a pipeline policy—not an automatic availability guarantee. |
| Which SAST tools integrate into an existing CI pipeline without slowing down developer velocity? | perplexity | Snyk Code — Can run in CI through the Snyk CLI and is designed to check code changes for vulnerabilities. |



## Competitor excerpts

| Platform | Competitor name | Excerpt |
| --- | --- | --- |
| google-ai-mode | Endor Labs | 9 Best SAST Tools in 2026: Accuracy, Speed, and Noise Compared \| Blog \| Endor Labs[Noisy security scanners make apps less secure - Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/VibeCodersNest/comments/1rbf05f/noisy_... |
| perplexity | Semgrep | For first-party code, I’d shortlist Semgrep; for dependency vulnerabilities, Snyk. |
| chatgpt-search | Semgrep | ## 1. Semgrep Best for low-noise code scanning Semgrep combines static application security testing (SAST), dependency scanning, and secrets detection. |
| chatgpt-search | Endor Labs | Semgrep website ## 2. Endor Labs Best for dependency alert noise Its standout capability is function-level dependency reachability: determining whether an application can actually execute vulnerable code in a dependency. |
| google-ai | Endor Labs | Endor Labs: Highly effective at cutting dependency noise (by up to 90%+) by mapping deep function-level call graphs. |
| google-ai-mode | Endor Labs | [Kodem Security] * Endor Labs (Package Firewall) — Combines function-level reachability analysis with package security policies and firewall capabilities to screen against suspicious or malicious open-source packages at install time. |
| google-ai-mode | Socket | Socket - Block zero-day supply chain attacksSocket.dev: Detecting Supply Chain Attacks Before They Hit Leading tools specialized in or capable of detecting... |
| perplexity | Socket | Socket — analyzes dependency code and metadata for signs such as unexpected install scripts, network or shell access, obfuscation, and typosquatting. |
| chatgpt-search | Socket | ## Tools worth shortlisting ## 1. Socket Strongest fit for proactive detection Analyzes dependency source code, metadata, and maintainer activity for suspicious behavior, including obfuscated code, unexpected install scripts, network access, typosqu... |
| google-ai | Checkmarx | Checkmarx The primary tools designed to detect malicious packages and suspicious package behavior include: ### 1\. |
| google-ai-mode | Endor Labs | ...](https://www.pixee.ai/blog/best-sast-tools-2026)9 Best SAST Tools in 2026: Accuracy, Speed, and Noise Compared \| Blog \| Endor Labs To achieve low real-world false-positive rates and manage alerts effec... |
| chatgpt-search | Semgrep | ...ities are low false-positive rates, low developer triage burden, and the ability to manage findings across hundreds of repositories, I would shortlist Checkmarx One, Fortify Static Code Analyzer, Veracode Static Analysis, Semgrep Code, and GitHub CodeQL. |



## Trend

Visibility delta: -5.600000000000001
Avg position delta: 6.2918918918918925
Citation count delta: 18